The Breeding Range of the Painted Bunting in South Carolina

The Auk ◽  
1935 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas D. Burleigh
Keyword(s):  
South Carolina ◽  
Breeding Range ◽  
Painted Bunting

Eastern Phoebe Breeding-range Expansion into the Pee Dee Region of South Carolina

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 516-528
Author(s):  
Douglas B. McNair
Keyword(s):  
South Carolina ◽  
Range Expansion ◽  
Breeding Range ◽  
Pee Dee ◽  
Eastern Phoebe

First Winter Occurrence of Painted Bunting, Passerina ciris, in South Carolina

The Auk ◽  
1950 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 398-398
Author(s):  
Alexander Sprunt,
Keyword(s):  
South Carolina ◽  
Painted Bunting ◽  
Passerina Ciris

Reddish Egret Extends its Breeding Range along the North American Atlantic Coast into South Carolina

Waterbirds ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 525-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa M. Ferguson ◽  
Patrick G. R. Jodice ◽  
William Post ◽  
Felicia I. Sanders
Keyword(s):  
South Carolina ◽  
North American ◽  
Atlantic Coast ◽  
Breeding Range ◽  
The North

scholarly journals A Migratory Divide in the Painted Bunting (Passerina ciris)

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.J. Battey ◽  
Ethan B. Linck ◽  
Kevin L. Epperly ◽  
Cooper French ◽  
David L. Slager ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mississippi River ◽  
Atlantic Coast ◽  
Morphological Data ◽  
Life History Trait ◽  
Sympatric Populations ◽  
Breeding Range ◽  
Painted Bunting ◽  
Lower Mississippi River ◽  
Passerina Ciris ◽  
Migratory Divide

AbstractDivergence in migratory behavior is a potential mechanism of lineage divergence in sympatric populations and a key life history trait used in the identification of demographically independent units for conservation purposes. In the Painted Bunting (Passerina ciris), a North American songbird, populations on the Atlantic coast and interior southern United States are known to be allopatric during the breeding season, but efforts to map connectivity with wintering ranges in Mexico, Florida, and the Caribbean have been largely inconclusive. Using genomic and morphological data from natural history specimens and banded birds, we found evidence of three genetically differentiated populations with distinct wintering ranges and molt-migration phenologies. In addition to confirming that the Atlantic coast population remains allopatric throughout the annual cycle, we identified an unexpected migratory divide within the interior breeding range. Populations breeding in the Lower Mississippi River Valley winter on the Yucatán Peninsula, and are parapatric with other interior populations that winter in mainland Mexico and Central America. Across the interior breeding range, genetic ancestry is also associated with variation in wing length; suggesting that selective pressures may be promoting morphological divergence in populations with different migration strategies.

An Ultrastructural Comparison of Hepatocytes from ADH+ and ADH−Peromyscus Maniculatus

1996 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 30-31
Author(s):  
J. T. Ellzey ◽  
D. Borunda ◽  
B. P. Stewart
Keyword(s):  
South Carolina ◽  
Adult Male ◽  
Uranyl Acetate ◽  
Model System ◽  
Deer Mice ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Genetic Stock ◽  
Hepes Buffer ◽  
Transmission Electron ◽  
Color Scanner

Genetically alcohol deficient deer mice (ADHN/ADHN) (obtained from the Peromyscus Genetic Stock Center, Univ. of South Carolina) lack hepatic cytosolic alcohol dehydrogenase. In order to determine if these deer mice would provide a model system for an ultrastructural study of the effects of ethanol on hepatocyte organelles, 75 micrographs of ADH+ adult male deer mice (n=5) were compared with 75 micrographs of ADH− adult male deer mice (n=5). A morphometric analysis of mitochondrial and peroxisomal parameters was undertaken.The livers were perfused with 0.1M HEPES buffer followed by 0.25% glutaraldehyde and 2% sucrose in 0.1M HEPES buffer (4C), removed, weighed and fixed by immersion in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1M HEPES buffer, pH 7.4, followed by a 3,3’ diaminobenzidine (DAB) incubation, postfixation with 2% OsO4, en bloc staining with 1% uranyl acetate in 0.025M maleate-NaOH buffer, dehydrated, embedded in Poly/Bed 812-BDMA epon resin, sectioned and poststained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Photographs were taken on a Zeiss EM-10 transmission electron microscope, scanned with a Howtek personal color scanner, analyzed with OPTIMAS 4.02 software on a Gateway2000 4DX2-66V personal computer and stored in Excel 4.0.

South Carolina Must Support Communication of Inmates With Hearing Loss

ASHA Leader ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 12-12
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
South Carolina

Use of the AMA Guides in State Workers' Compensation Systems: 2009 Update

2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 13-16
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Brigham ◽  
Jenny Walker
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
North Carolina ◽  
South Carolina ◽  
South Dakota ◽  
Rhode Island ◽  
Workers Compensation ◽  
Fourth Edition ◽  
Sixth Edition ◽  
Specific Guideline ◽  
Compensation Systems

Abstract The AMAGuides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides) is the most widely used basis for determining impairment and is used in state workers’ compensation systems, federal systems, automobile casualty, and personal injury, as well as by the majority of state workers’ compensation jurisdictions. Two tables summarize the edition of the AMA Guides used and provide information by state. The fifth edition (2000) is the most commonly used edition: California, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Kentucky, New Hampshire, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Nevada, North Dakota, Ohio, Vermont, and Washington. Eleven states use the sixth edition (2007): Alaska, Arizona, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, and Wyoming. Eight states still commonly make use of the fourth edition (1993): Alabama, Arkansas, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, South Dakota, Texas, and West Virginia. Two states use the Third Edition, Revised (1990): Colorado and Oregon. Connecticut does not stipulate which edition of the AMA Guides to use. Six states use their own state specific guidelines (Florida, Illinois, Minnesota, New York, North Carolina, and Wisconsin), and six states do not specify a specific guideline (Michigan, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, South Carolina, and Virginia). Statutes may or may not specify which edition of the AMA Guides to use. Some states use their own guidelines for specific problems and use the Guides for other issues.

Modern Clastic Depositional Environments, South Carolina: Charleston to Columbia, South Carolina, July 20–25, 1989

10.1029/ft371 ◽  
1989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miles O. Hayes ◽  
Walter J. Sexton
Keyword(s):  
South Carolina ◽  
Depositional Environments

South Carolina hosts at-risk youth national forum

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
South Carolina ◽  
At Risk Youth ◽  
National Forum
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document