A comprehensive review of research conducted with the program evaluation instruments PASS and PASSING

Author(s):  
ROBERT J. FLYNN
Author(s):  
Atie Setiawati ◽  
Uman Suherman A.S ◽  
Nandang Rusmana

Program evaluation in comprehensive guidance and counseling is very important to determine the level of goal achievement. In order for the evaluation results to provide the right information, a valid and reliable instrument is needed. At the higher education level, the comprehensive guidance and counseling program, including the program evaluation component, does not have many references that users can refer to. The available references focus more on primary and secondary education levels. This research is intended to produce the intended evaluation instrument. Descriptive methods and literature review were used in this study. The data were revealed using a Delphi technique questionnaire involving three experts, then analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. In this study, the constructs of evaluation instruments for comprehensive guidance and counseling programs were synthesized and modified from various expert opinions and professional organizations with two patterns of answers: yes and no, translated into 294 statements. The resulting evaluation instrument needs to be empirically tested for its feasibility by involving adequate participants.


2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. S21-S29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas R. Mathews ◽  
Zachary J. Kunicki ◽  
Sarah E. Colby ◽  
Lisa Franzen-Castle ◽  
Kendra K. Kattelmann ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allen Rubin
Keyword(s):  

2002 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 229-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurt A. Heller ◽  
Ralph Reimann

Summary In this paper, conceptual and methodological problems of school program evaluation are discussed. The data were collected in conjunction with a 10 year cross-sectional/longitudinal investigation with partial inclusion of control groups. The experiences and conclusions resulting from this long-term study are revealing not only from the vantage point of the scientific evaluation of new scholastic models, but are also valuable for program evaluation studies in general, particularly in the field of gifted education.


1982 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 878-879
Author(s):  
Lawrence H. Cohen

1983 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-68
Author(s):  
Charles S. Reichardt
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document