Famine Foods:

Famine Foods ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 40-64
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-130
Author(s):  
Kathryn Jean Edgerton-Tarpley

This article examines change and continuity in the selection, conceptualisation and state-sponsorship of 'famine foods' in late Qing, Nationalist and Maoist China. It employs as case studies the following severe famines that struck North China under three markedly different regimes: the North China Famine of 1876-79, the Henan Famine of 1942/43 and the Great Leap Famine of 1958-62. Continuities that cut across the three periods include the particular non-grain foods - beginning with tree bark and wild plants and extending to Bodhisattva earth (Guanyin tu) - consumed at the local level, and a tradition of elite involvement in identifying and endorsing items that could relieve starvation. The terms used to describe survival foods changed significantly, however, as did the rationale for promoting such foods. Moreover, as twentieth-century Chinese modernisers joined their Western counterparts in championing the use of science and technology to address food crises and other disasters, state-run health and scientific agencies played an increasingly active role in testing and promoting recipes for non-grain foods. This trend reached its zenith during the Great Leap Famine, when the government launched a 'food substitute' (daishipin) campaign that aimed to address food shortages without reducing grain quotas by encouraging the mass-production of food substitutes such as chlorella and artificial meat. This campaign can be understood as a sharp departure from Qing China's grain-centred famine relief policies, a radical extension of rhetoric and priorities laid out during the Nationalist period and a case of high modernism gone badly awry.


2015 ◽  
Vol 120 ◽  
pp. 303-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria Reyes-García ◽  
Gorka Menendez-Baceta ◽  
Laura Aceituno-Mata ◽  
Rufino Acosta-Naranjo ◽  
Laura Calvet-Mir ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
PAUL E. MINNIS
Keyword(s):  

2008 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 29-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jocelyn Muller ◽  
Iro Guimbo

During my time as a Peace Corps Volunteer in Niger, my colleagues and I1 were often amused by reporter's descriptions of people "eating leaves off of the trees" as indications of the dire conditions in Niger. This was amusing to us because, as well fed Americans, "leaves off of the trees" was one of our favorite Nigerien dishes and was something routinely eaten, sold and enjoyed in both urban and rural Niger regardless of the state of food security. To imply that eating leaves was a sign of a state of emergency seemed like sensationalism, if not just poor fact checking. A few years later when I began my dissertation on the traditional uses of plants in Niger, I was surprised to find some of the same ideas repeated in scientific literature. When I discussed this with my co-author, Mr. Dan Guimbo, he was surprised that something so important to Nigerien culture and nutrition could be seen as an indicator of bad times. So we began to investigate both the literature on the subject of famine foods and the local perspective of famine foods within the village Boumba, in southwest Niger. While our results of the basic Zarma concept of "famine foods" are reported elsewhere (Muller and Almedom 2008), this article looks at the differences in the types of plants reported in the famine food literature versus by the villagers themselves and the implications this can have for practitioners and aid workers especially in famine relief interventions.


1974 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. M. Bhandari
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Viviany Teixeira do Nascimento ◽  
Letícia Zenóbia de Oliveira Campos

Rural History ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
ROBERT A. DODGSHON

With their climatic variability and low crop yields, the Highlands and Islands formed a risk-laden environment for traditional farming communities. Yet whilst the major or exceptional famines between 1600 and 1800 are well-recorded, there has been less comment about the more frequent low-order crises that afflicted communities on a regular, even routine basis, leaving them without sufficient meal for a month or so before the new harvest was ready. Evidence for the nature and frequency of these low-order crises is discussed. Continually threatened with the problems posed by them, it is argued that the typical farming community would have been skilled in their response. Two forms of response are explored. First, the paper reviews some of the different ways in which Highland and Hebridean husbandry would have been organised so as to minimise risks. Second, it is argued that when these risk aversion strategies failed, communities buffered themselves against shortage by resorting to a range of alternative famine foods, from seaweeds and shell foods to the edible weeds of arable and grassland. We need to see major famines as occurring not just when exceptional or bad conditions prevailed, but also, when both these risk aversion and risk buffering strategies failed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document