Some Freedom of Locational Choice:

2021 ◽  
pp. 67-76
Keyword(s):  
1989 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 145-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald F. Schaefer

This article examines the economic and noneconomic factors that influenced the migration decisions of antebellum Southern households. It appears that nonslaveowners were neither pushed to inferior locations nor did they move independently of the economic consequences. For slaveowners, the observed links between locational choice and the economic characteristics of locations are weaker. The proportion of whites in a location's population was positively associated with the choice of a location for the nonslaveowners. This association was not found for any other group.


Data in Brief ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 226-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dora L. Costa ◽  
Matthew E. Kahn ◽  
Christopher Roudiez ◽  
Sven Wilson

2004 ◽  
Vol 49 (02) ◽  
pp. 179-193
Author(s):  
KAZUHIRO TETSU

Little attention has been given to the issue of the locational choice for EPZs, from a theoretical point of view, except by Miyagiwa (1993). In this paper, using a three-sector general equilibrium model with unemployment, we will examine theoretically the issue of where to locate EPZs. This model gives policy makers in developing countries four policy options. An interesting result is as follows: it reveals that attracting foreign firms which are more labor-intensive (capital-intensive) than the rural domestic firms into the rural-based EPZ is the best (worst) policy for developing countries.


2005 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudio Piga ◽  
Joanna Poyago-Theotoky
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document