Articulating a new public sector reform:

2019 ◽  
pp. 147-178
2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 603-618
Author(s):  
Lhawang Ugyel ◽  
Carsten Daugbjerg

The scope and intensity of policy transfer has increased in recent years as developing countries have drawn on public sector reform programmes based on new public management practices originally designed in western democracies. However, there is mounting evidence that to be successful, reform programmes must be adapted to local contexts. This article demonstrates that national government control of policy transfer can enable localisation which in turn enhances the effectiveness of public reforms. Analysis of the Position Classification System ‐ which sought to enhance accountability, efficiency and professionalism in the civil service in Bhutan ‐ highlights two conditions that enable domestic control of the policy transfer process: strong internal motivation for engaging in policy transfer and the establishment or adaptation of institutions to manage processes of policy transfer. We conclude that when these conditions apply, a developing country can engage in successful voluntary policy transfer and retain control of the process.


foresight ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 332-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Sangiorgi

Purpose – The aim of this work is to provide an initial picture of how some design agencies are contributing toward a paradigm shift and how they are developing in the future to better inform design policies and interdisciplinary work. There is a general agreement that the current government and public sector structure and modes of operation need radical transformation. In this scenario, a shift from New Public Management towards New Public Governance paradigm has been auspicated. Design has attracted attention as a potential approach to support this transformation, but research into Service Design, as well as discussions on its future development, for public sector innovation is limited. This paper is an exploratory study into the individual work of seven representative UK design agencies operating for and within the public sector. Design/methodology/approach – The paper reviews literature on public sector reform and innovation to inform comparative studies of contemporary design agencies working for public sector reform. Interviews with seven designers from NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement, Participle, Innovation Unit, Uscreates, Collaborative Change, Futuregov and Snook are conducted to review their perceived role for public sector reform, their design approaches, exemplar projects and main challenges. Findings – Emerging design strategies for Public Sector reform are: a collaborative design approach that considers all stakeholders as equal co-creators of public value; operating at different complementary levels to aim at systemic change; designing from the inside out (innovation culture) and outside in (market change). These different strategies imply the development of possible different business models. Existing creative tensions appear between embedding and outsourcing strategies, acting as facilitators vs designers, developing both designing and service delivery roles. Research limitations/implications – This paper is based on a limited sample of design agencies, and it is not a systematic study into the impact of their design work, which should be the object of a following study. Practical implications – This paper brings Service Design practice into public sector innovation debate to inform future interdisciplinary research and innovation policies. It positions existing design innovation strategies within the wider picture of public sector reform to support a more informed design practice. Originality/value – Few studies have looked at the UK design agencies for public sector innovation and discussed their possible future developments. This paper provides an original and holistic description of design for public sector innovation with considerations on how it should be interpreted when developing supporting innovation and design policies.


2001 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-36
Author(s):  
Jaewan Bahk

This paper reviews the motivations, visions and strategies of the Kim Dae-Jung Administration’s public sector reform initiative, identifies promising features and problems, and brings up future tasks. A framework of analysis is set up based on systems analysis and change management. The initiative’s visions are largely successful in terms of setting up an infrastructure of structural reforms and institutionalizing the initiative as they properly focus on value-for-money and democracy. However, the new initiative pays relatively less attention to procedural democracy, an essential element to remedy the lop-sided operation of the Korean government. In accordance with five checkpoints suggested by the framework of analysis, the new initiative’s strategies are examined. Key features of the strategies are the followings: ( i ) tough leadership backed up by powerful driving agencies; ( ii ) top-down approaches; ( iii ) comprehensive scope with scattered safe harbors; ( iv ) conflicts and distortions from myopic perspectives and political motives; and ( v ) higher intensity and faster pace in compelled uniformity. Corresponding to these features, we suggested several tasks to be addressed. Among other things, a bottom-up approach and a clean up of the political context prior to or at least simultaneously with the new public management drive are indispensable for a successful reform.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document