The Role of the Internal Audit Function in the Disclosure of Material Weaknesses

2011 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 287-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shu Lin ◽  
Mina Pizzini ◽  
Mark Vargus ◽  
Indranil R. Bardhan
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Internal Audit ◽  
Section 404 ◽  
Material Weakness ◽  
Internal Auditor ◽  
Internal Audit Function ◽  
Sarbanes Oxley ◽  
Material Weaknesses ◽  
Using Data

ABSTRACT: This study investigates the role that a firm’s internal audit function (IAF) plays in the disclosure of material weaknesses reported under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (U.S. Congress 2002). Using data from 214 firms, we examine the relation between material weakness (MW) disclosures and various IAF attributes and activities. Our results indicate that MW disclosures are negatively associated with the education level of the IAF and the extent to which the IAF incorporates quality assurance techniques into fieldwork, audits activities related to financial reporting, and monitors the remediation of previously identified control problems. The timing of Section 404 work and the nature of follow-up monitoring suggests that these aspects of IAF quality help prevent MWs from occurring. We find that MW disclosures are positively associated with the IAF practice of grading audit engagements and external-internal auditor coordination, suggesting that these activities increase the effectiveness of Section 404 compliance processes.

The Persistence in the Association between Section 404 Material Weaknesses and Financial Reporting Quality

2013 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma-Riikka Myllymäki
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Internal Control ◽  
Reporting Quality ◽  
Financial Reporting Quality ◽  
Control Problems ◽  
Section 404 ◽  
Material Weakness ◽  
Sarbanes Oxley ◽  
Material Weaknesses ◽  
History Of

SUMMARY This study examines whether Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Section 404 material weakness (MW404) disclosures are predictive of future financial reporting quality. I find evidence that for companies with a history of MW404s, the likelihood of misstatements in financial information continues to be significantly higher for two years after the last MW404 report compared to companies without a history of reported MW404s. The magnitude of the effect decreases non-linearly with decreasing speed. The findings further imply that the reason for the misstatement incidences is the unacknowledged pervasiveness of control problems. In particular, it appears that in many cases, the future misstatements are unrelated to the MW types disclosed in the last MW404 report, suggesting that some MW types are unacknowledged and, hence, control problems are even more pervasive than what was identified. Overall, the findings of this study highlight the importance of discovering and disclosing material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting.

The Role of the Internal Audit Function in the Disclosure of Material Weaknesses

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shu Lin ◽  
Mina Pizzini ◽  
Mark E. Vargus ◽  
Indranil Bardhan
Keyword(s):  
Internal Audit ◽  
Internal Audit Function ◽  
Material Weaknesses

The Impact of SOX Section 404 Internal Control Quality Assessment on Audit Delay in the SOX Era

2006 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael L. Ettredge ◽  
Chan Li ◽  
Lili Sun
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Internal Control ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Impact Factors ◽  
Section 404 ◽  
Material Weakness ◽  
Control Quality ◽  
Sarbanes Oxley ◽  
Specific Material ◽  
The Impact

This study analyzes the impact of internal control quality on audit delay following the implementation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (2002) (SOX). Unlike prior studies of audit delay that obtain information about internal control strength via surveys, or use fairly crude proxies for internal control quality, our study employs external auditor assessments of internal control over financial reporting (ICOFR) that are publicly disclosed in SEC 10-K filings under SOX Section 404. Thus, the empirical evidence provided in this study is both timely and reliable (i.e., not subject to small sample bias or weak proxies). Consistent with our expectation, we find that the presence of material weakness in ICOFR is associated with longer delays. The types of material weakness also matter. Compared to specific material weakness, general material weakness is associated with longer delays. Additional analyses indicate that companies with control problems in personnel, process and procedure, segregation of duties, and closing process experience longer delays. After controlling for other impact factors, this study also documents a significant increase in audit delay associated with the fulfillment of the SOX Section 404 ICOFR assessment requirement. This suggests that Section 404 assessments have made it more difficult for firms to comply with the SEC's desire to shorten 10-K filing deadlines. Our finding thus supports and helps explain the SEC's decisions in 2004 and 2005 to defer scheduled reductions in 10-K filing deadlines (from 75 days to 60 days) for large, accelerated filers.

SOX Section 404 Material Weakness Disclosures and Audit Fees

2006 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Raghunandan ◽  
Dasaratha V. Rama
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Internal Control ◽  
Audit Fees ◽  
Internal Controls ◽  
Fiscal Year ◽  
Section 404 ◽  
Control Material ◽  
Material Weakness ◽  
Sarbanes Oxley ◽  
The Mean

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Auditing Standard No. 2 (PCAOB 2004) require management and the auditor to report on internal controls over financial reporting. Section 404 is arguably the most controversial element of SOX, and much of the debate around the costs of implementing section 404 has focused on auditors' fees (Ernst & Young 2005). In this paper, we examine the association between audit fees and internal control disclosures made pursuant to section 404. Our sample includes 660 manufacturing firms that have a December 31, 2004 fiscal year-end and filed the section 404 report by May 15, 2005. We find that the mean (median) audit fees for the firms in our sample for fiscal 2004 is 86 (128) percent higher than the corresponding fees for fiscal 2003. Audit fees for fiscal 2004 are 43 percent higher for clients with a material weakness disclosure compared to clients without such disclosure; however, audit fees for fiscal 2003 are not associated with an internal control material weakness disclosure (in the 10-K filed following fiscal 2004). We also find that the association between audit fees and the presence of a material weakness disclosure does not vary depending on the type of material weakness (systemic or non-systemic).

Control Self-Assessment and Costs of Compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 5-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence J. Abbott ◽  
Susan Parker ◽  
Gary F. Peters ◽  
Theresa J. Presley
Keyword(s):  
Control Systems ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Internal Control ◽  
Audit Fees ◽  
Negative Association ◽  
Management Control ◽  
Section 404 ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Internal Auditor ◽  
Sarbanes Oxley

ABSTRACT Control self-assessment (CSA) represents the practice of making operational-level managers responsible for internal control monitoring. We investigate the association between the use of CSA and certain costs incurred in maintaining internal control systems and complying with regulatory requirements. We find a negative association between CSA and external audit fees paid for the audit of internal control over financial reporting. Moreover, we find an incremental fee reduction resulting from the interaction between CSA and Section 404 assistance provided to the external auditor by the internal auditor. Additionally, we find a negative association between the use of CSA and some costs of the internal audit's own evaluation of operational and financial controls for managerial purposes. In sum, our study suggests that CSA can lessen at least some internal control costs while reducing control risk as proxied by external costs of internal control compliance. We discuss implications for broader management control systems.

Corporate Governance and Internal Control over Financial Reporting: A Comparison of Regulatory Regimes

2009 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 839-867 ◽  
Author(s):  
Udi Hoitash ◽  
Rani Hoitash ◽  
Jean C. Bedard
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Internal Control ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Section 404 ◽  
Sarbanes Oxley ◽  
Material Weaknesses ◽  
Financial Expertise ◽  
Financial Expert ◽  
Section 302

ABSTRACT: This study examines the association between corporate governance and disclosures of material weaknesses (MW) in internal control over financial reporting. We study this association using MW reported under Sarbanes-Oxley Sections 302 and 404, deriving data on audit committee financial expertise from automated parsing of member qualifications from their biographies. We find that a lower likelihood of disclosing Section 404 MW is associated with relatively more audit committee members having accounting and supervisory experience, as well as board strength. Further, the nature of MW varies with the type of experience. However, these associations are not detectable using Section 302 reports. We also find that MW disclosure is associated with designating a financial expert without accounting experience, or designating multiple financial experts. We conclude that board and audit committee characteristics are associated with internal control quality. However, this association is only observable under the more stringent requirements of Section 404.

Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Stock Price Crash Risk

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald Lobo ◽  
Chong Wang ◽  
Xiaoou Yu ◽  
Yuping Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Stock Price ◽  
Positive Association ◽  
Internal Controls ◽  
Crash Risk ◽  
Significant Relation ◽  
Material Weakness ◽  
Sarbanes Oxley ◽  
Material Weaknesses ◽  
Section 302

We investigate the association between material weakness in internal controls (MW) disclosed under Section 302 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) and future stock price crash risk. We argue that relative to firms with effective internal controls, firms with MW have lower financial reporting precision. The lower reporting precision (a) increases divergence of investor opinion with regard to firm valuation and (b) facilitates managers’ withholding of negative information, which increases the information asymmetry between managers and outside investors. We hypothesize that both these effects increase the probability of a future stock price crash. We find empirical evidence consistent with our prediction. In additional analyses, we document that the positive association between MW and crash risk is primarily driven by company level rather than by account-specific weaknesses, increases with the number of material weaknesses, and intensifies during the financial crisis. In addition, we find that both the existence and the disclosure of MW incrementally affect crash risk, and that MW facilitates managers’ withholding of bad news. Finally, we fail to find consistent evidence of a significant relation between MW disclosed under Section 404 of SOX and crash risk.

The Influence of Auditor and Client Section 404 Processes on Remediation of Internal Control Deficiencies at All Levels of Severity

2013 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 45-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynford Graham ◽  
Jean C. Bedard
Keyword(s):  
Internal Control ◽  
Financial Risk ◽  
Balance Sheet ◽  
Section 404 ◽  
Level Control ◽  
Sarbanes Oxley ◽  
Material Weaknesses ◽  
Financial Misstatements ◽  
Internal Control Deficiencies ◽  
Using Data

SUMMARY This paper examines remediation of Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 internal control deficiencies (ICDs) at all levels of severity, before the balance sheet date. While a number of studies investigate remediation of publicly disclosed material weaknesses (MWs), the activity we study takes place out of public view and occurs among companies with both clean and adverse Section 404 opinions. Using data provided by multiple auditing firms, we find that about one-fourth of detected ICDs are remediated before year-end, leaving many uncorrected. We model remediation activity with direct measures of company and auditor Section 404 processes not available to prior research. Model results show that companies' effective information technology integration and early start to control testing are positively associated with remediation. In contrast, remediation is negatively associated with discovery by auditors, discovery by substantive tests, and related financial misstatements. Following prior research on MWs, we also observe that ICD remediation is less likely for smaller companies with greater financial risk, and for certain entity-level control problems.

An Examination of Internal Auditor Objectivity: In-House versus Outsourcing

2004 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunita S. Ahlawat ◽  
D. Jordan Lowe
Keyword(s):  
Exploratory Study ◽  
Internal Audit ◽  
Accounting Firms ◽  
Internal Auditor ◽  
Internal Auditors ◽  
Internal Audit Function ◽  
Big 4 ◽  
Client Advocacy

The internal audit function is evolving from its traditional oversight function to one that includes a wider spectrum of activities that add value to their organizations. In addition, economic pressures have forced many companies to consider outsourcing as an alternative. These ongoing changes have caused some concern regarding the potential lack of objectivity and independence for internal auditors. This exploratory study examines whether outsourcing of the internal audit function is susceptible to client advocacy vis-a`-vis in-house auditing, which itself may be sensitive to an employer advocacy Sixty-six practicing members of the Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) completed a case study involving a corporate acquisition scenario. Of the 66 participants, 35 were from corporations (in-house), while the remaining 31 were from the Big 4 accounting firms (outsource). Advocacy was manipulated by asking participants to assume the role of internal auditor for either the buyer or the seller of a target division. Result s indicate that significant advocacy existed in the judgments of both in-house and outsource internal auditors. However, the extent of advocacy was less severe in the case of outsource auditors.

Unexpected Fees and the Prediction of Material Weaknesses in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 485-505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan M. Albring ◽  
Randal J. Elder ◽  
Xiaolu Xu
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Internal Control ◽  
Audit Fees ◽  
Financial Statement ◽  
Section 404 ◽  
Sarbanes Oxley ◽  
Material Weaknesses ◽  
New Material ◽  
Internal Control Weaknesses ◽  
Section 302

We investigate whether prior year unexpected audit fees help predict new material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting reported under Section 404 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act (SOX). Predicting material weaknesses may be useful to investors and other financial statement users because these disclosures have adverse economic impacts on disclosing firms. Unexpected fees are significantly associated with material weaknesses reported under Section 404, even after controlling for Section 302 disclosures and other factors associated with internal control weaknesses. Unexpected fees are associated with company-level weaknesses but are not significantly associated with account-specific weaknesses, consistent with differences in the nature and severity of the two types of material weaknesses. Our results are consistent with unexpected audit fees containing information on unobserved audit costs and client control risks, which help predict future internal control weaknesses.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document