scholarly journals Response to: Root resorption diagnosed with cone beam computed tomography after 6 months of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliance and the relation to risk factors. By Dimitrios Makedonas, Henrik Lund, Kerstin Grondahl, Ken Hansen. Angle Orthod. 2012;82:196–201

2012 ◽  
Vol 82 (5) ◽  
pp. 952-952 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitrios Makedonas
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Liu ◽  
Juhua Shao ◽  
Shufang Li ◽  
Maher Al-balaa ◽  
Lulu Xia ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Objectives To investigate the prevalence and severity of external apical root resorption (EARR) volumetrically with clear aligner therapy using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) as well as determine the possible risk factors and develop a prediction model for EARR. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, 320 incisors from 40 Class II patients treated with aligners (Invisalign) were included in this study. CBCT images were obtained at pretreatment (T0) and posttreatment (T1). Root volume was calculated by three-dimensional reconstruction of CBCT images, and apical tooth movement was measured from superimposed CBCT images. Changes in root volume were compared using paired t-tests, and the relationship between root volume loss and potential risk factors was analyzed by multiple linear regression. Results All of the measured incisors showed root volume loss, with an average of 11.48 ± 6.70 mm3, and the prevalence of severe resorption was 0.625%. The prediction model for EARR included variables of posttreatment sagittal root position (SRP), extraction, tooth type, and apical intrusion and extrusion displacements, with an R2 of 0.51. Age, sex, duration, pretreatment SRP, attachment, advancement, and retraction movements were excluded from the model. Conclusions Most incisors showed mild to moderate resorption during aligner treatment; only a minimal percentage showed severe resorption. Posttreatment SRP (which showed the highest association with EARR), extraction, tooth type, and apical intrusion and extrusion displacements were risk factors for EARR.


2012 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 389-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitrios Makedonas ◽  
Henrik Lund ◽  
Ken Hansen

ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the prevalence of orthodontically induced root resorption after treatment and the correlation with resorption found after 6 months of treatment. Materials and Methods: One hundred fifty-six patients (11–18 years) treated with fixed appliances and extraction of four premolars were examined with cone beam computed tomography before treatment, after 6 months of treatment (n  =  97), and at the end of active treatment. The Malmgren Index was used to describe the degree of root resorption. Results: Severe root resorption (>2 mm, score 3) was found in 25.6% of the patients at the end of treatment. Extreme root resorption was found in one patient. Root resorption was seen more frequently in the maxillary incisor region. There was no correlation between the severity of root resorption after 6 months and the amount observed at the end of treatment. Furthermore, no correlation was seen between treatment duration and the severity of root resorption. Conclusions: Clinically significant resorption was diagnosed in 25.6% of the patients, but no correlations, either with the resorption seen after 6 months or with the length of treatment, were found. Radiographic examination after 3 to 6 months of orthodontic treatment is too early and will not reduce the number of patients who will have teeth with severe root resorption.


2012 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iury O. Castro ◽  
Ana H. G. Alencar ◽  
José Valladares-Neto ◽  
Carlos Estrela

ABSTRACT Objective: To determine the frequency of apical root resorption (ARR) due to orthodontic treatment using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in a sample of 1256 roots from 30 patients. Materials and Methods: All patients had Class I malocclusion with crowding. Of the 30 patients evaluated, 11 were boys and 19 were girls; their mean age was 13 years (11 to 16 years). Orthodontic treatment followed the nonextraction treatment. CBCT images were obtained before and after orthodontic treatment, and ARR was determined using Axial Guided Navigation of CBCT images. Results: All patients had ARR. No statistically significant association was found between resorption frequency, gender, and age. ARR was detected using CBCT in 46% of all roots that underwent orthodontic treatment. Conclusions: CBCT was effective for detecting in vivo even minimal degrees of ARR due to orthodontic treatment and allowed three-dimensional evaluation of dental roots and visualization of palatine roots of maxillary molars. The highest frequencies and the most significant ARR occurred in incisors and distal roots of first maxillary and mandibular molars.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document