scholarly journals Comparison of hook selectivity curve between two different-shaped hooks for red tilefish Branchiostegus japonicus

2010 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
HIDEYUKI YAMASHITA ◽  
YOUSUKE OCHI ◽  
DAISUKE SHIODE ◽  
TADASHI TOKAI
Crustaceana ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 91 (12) ◽  
pp. 1483-1493
Author(s):  
Kunihiko Izawa

Abstract Hatschekia laeopsi sp. nov., H. branchiostegi Yamaguti, 1939 and H. pagrosomi Yamaguti, 1939 are (re-)described based on specimens collected from the branchial lamellae of three Japanese fishes, Laeops kitaharae (Smith & Pope, 1906) (Pleuronectidae), Branchiostegus japonicus (Houttuyn, 1782) (Malacanthidae), and Dentex tumifrons (Temminck & Schlegel, 1843) (Sparidae), respectively. The free-living stages of H. branchiostegi are described for the species for the first time.


2014 ◽  
Vol 94 (7) ◽  
pp. 1539-1544
Author(s):  
Ferhat Kalaycı ◽  
Tuncay Yeşılçıçek

The size selectivity of traditional gillnets for whiting, (Merlangius merlangus euxinus) was investigated in the eastern Black Sea between June 2010 and June 2011. Experimental fishing operations were carried out by using gillnets of 16, 17, 18, 20 and 22 mm mesh size. A total of 2038 specimens belonging to 16 different fish species were caught during the experiment. The Share Each Length's Catch Total method was used to fit gillnet selectivity curves. Gillnet selectivity was best described by a bi-modal selectivity curve. The modal catch sizes were estimated as 14.81, 15.74, 16.66, 18.51 and 20.37 cm for 16, 17, 18, 20 and 22 mm mesh sizes, respectively. Modal lengths and spread values increased with increasing mesh size. The majority of fish (71.8%) caught by 16 mm mesh size were less than the length at first sexual maturity.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (08) ◽  
pp. 401-413
Author(s):  
Guoqiang Xu ◽  
Wenbin Zhu ◽  
Yongdong Zhou ◽  
Liuxiong Xu

Bottom longline fishing of red tilefish (Branchiostegus japonicus) is one of the most important commercial of fishing in the East China Sea. The present study aimed to investigate hook selectivity in B. japonicus and D. tumifrons, by means of experiments using three hook sizes (“J”: #15, #13 and #11) and was conducted in the East China Sea from June to August 2018. Altogether 602 B. japonicus fish and 858 D. tumifrons fish were caught. With respect to the size of the hook used, the total length-frequency varied significantly for both B. japonicus and D. tumifrons that were caught. The total length and four mouth parameters (upper and lower jaw length as well as height and width of mouth opening) of the two species showed a positive linear relationship. A logistic model created using the maximum likelihood method was used for elucidating hook selectivity; the best fit model with the minimum Akaike’s Information Criterion value was selected as the final model. The 50% selection lengths were 224.827 and 233.179 mm for B. japonicus; 201.461 and 202.603 mm for D. tumifrons using “J” #13 and “J” #11 hooks, respectively. To preserve the reproductive potential of younger fish in the stocks, the size of the “J” #13 hook was selected as the minimum hook size that should be used for the sustainable development of bottom longline fishing for B. japonicus and D. tumifrons.


1994 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 774-783 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loren M. Miller ◽  
Anne R. Kapuscinski

We developed a model to predict genetic response to selection imposed by a size-selective fishery. Use of our model provides estimates of selection as a function of heritability and overall selection differential imposed against a size-related trait, length of a scale radius from the focus to a given annulus (radius n). Selection differentials were estimated using data from the walleye (Stizostedion vitreum) fishery in Red Lakes, Minnesota. Overall selection differentials, incorporating selection differentials estimated by age and sex, and weighted by the contribution to spawning, were negative for the 1955 spawning population and positive for that of 1958. Directions of selection differentials, estimated by age and sex, generally corresponded to expected directions of selection based on the shape of the gillnet selectivity curve for walleye, suggesting that scale radii are useful for estimating selection against size traits. Results indicated that selective effects of gear may be surprisingly complex and population characteristics must be well understood before changes in fishery management are considered. We suggest that measurement of overall selection differentials alone may provide a useful management tool for indicating genetic risks of selective fisheries.


1966 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 423-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. A. Regier ◽  
D. S. Robson

This paper re-examines five methods previously described for estimating the selectivity of gill nets as influenced by mesh size, and introduces four more. Those that appeared appropriate for lake whitefish on the basis of preliminary analysis were employed to estimate selectivity using data on whitefish from South Bay, Manitoulin Island, Ontario.The methods considered most reliable yielded estimates of selectivity curves for whitefish resembling the normal probability function with a positive skew. The length at which the mode occurred was a significantly nonlinear function of mesh size, the variance was approximately proportional to the square of the mesh size, and the coefficient of skewness not related to mesh size.An implication of these findings is that, for general sampling purposes, standard gangs in which mesh size increased in a certain geometric progression would be more efficient than those with mesh sizes in the usual arithmetic progression. The series for lake whitefish might be 1.40(1.275)x with x = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.Under the assumption that at peak efficiency all mesh sizes are equally efficient with respect to number of fish, "total efficiency" of a mesh size is defined as the area under the selectivity curve. With respect to number, we estimated that, for whitefish, total efficiency r = 12 + 5.5 (mesh size, stretch measure in inches). Here peak efficiency is taken as 100, with length units as inches. Similarly with respect to weight total efficiency r = 0.80 (mesh size)3.2. Thus with respect to weight, total efficiency increases from about 7.5 for 2-inch mesh to 100 for 4.5-inch mesh to about 200 for 5.5-inch mesh.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document