scholarly journals FreeStyle Navigator Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Use in Children With Type 1 Diabetes Using Glargine-Based Multiple Daily Dose Regimens: Results of a pilot trial Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Study Group

Diabetes Care ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 525-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Weinzimer ◽  
D. Xing ◽  
M. Tansey ◽  
R. Fiallo-Scharer ◽  
N. Mauras ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Monitoring System ◽  
Pilot Trial ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Diabetes Research ◽  
Multiple Daily Dose ◽  
System Use ◽  
Daily Dose

scholarly journals Eight-Point Glucose Testing Versus the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Evaluation of Glycemic Control in Type 1 Diabetes

2005 ◽  
Vol 90 (6) ◽  
pp. 3387-3391 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Monitoring System ◽  
Continuous Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Hemoglobin A1c ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Continuous Glucose Monitoring System ◽  
Diabetes Research ◽  
Glucose Profiles ◽  
Mean Glucose

Context: Advantages/disadvantages of continuous vs. discrete glucose monitoring are not well documented. Objective: Compare glucose profiles from home meters vs. continuous sensors. Design: Randomized clinical trial conducted by the Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) to assess the utility of the GlucoWatch G2 Biographer. Setting: Home glucose measurements. Patients: Two hundred children (age, 7 to < 18 yr) with type 1 diabetes. Intervention: At baseline, subjects were asked to wear the continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) sensor and perform meter tests at eight prespecified times of the day (eight-point testing) each for 3 d (2 d using both, 1 d eight-point testing only, 1 d CGMS only). Hemoglobin A1c was measured in a central laboratory. Main Outcome Measure: Six-month hemoglobin A1c. This analysis looked at baseline glucose profiles/hemoglobin A1c. Results: Only 10% of subjects completed full eight-point testing for 3 d, but median CGMS use was 70 h. Mean glucose was lower when measured by the CGMS compared with eight-point testing (183 ± 37 vs. 188 ± 41 mg/dl; 10.2 ± 2.1 vs.10.4 ± 2.3 mmol/liter; P = 0.009), especially overnight (2400–0400 h; 174 vs. 199 mg/dl; 9.7 vs. 11.1 mmol/liter; P < 0.001). Associations of hemoglobin A1c with mean glucose were similar for eight-point testing [slope 23 mg/dl per 1% (1.3 mmol/liter); correlation 0.40; P < 0.001] and CGMS [slope 19 mg/dl per 1% (1.1 mmol/liter); correlation 0.39; P < 0.001]. Postprandial excursions were lower for eight-point testing vs. CGMS, especially after dinner (mean excursion −17 vs. 63 mg/dl; −1.0 vs. 3.5 mmol/liter; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Both methods gave similar mean glucose profiles and associations with hemoglobin A1c. Advantages of the CGMS were higher density of data and better detection of postprandial peaks. However, the CGMS may overestimate the frequency of low glucose levels, especially overnight.

Parental sleep quality and continuous glucose monitoring system use in children with type 1 diabetes

2013 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 499-503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. Landau ◽  
M. Rachmiel ◽  
O. Pinhas-Hamiel ◽  
M. Boaz ◽  
Y. Bar-Dayan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Sleep Quality ◽  
Monitoring System ◽  
Continuous Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Continuous Glucose Monitoring System ◽  
System Use

Non-adjunctive flash glucose monitoring system use during summer-camp in children with type 1 diabetes: The free-summer study

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 1285-1293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Piona ◽  
Klemen Dovc ◽  
Gül Y. Mutlu ◽  
Klara Grad ◽  
Petra Gregorc ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Monitoring System ◽  
Summer Camp ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Flash Glucose Monitoring ◽  
System Use ◽  
Flash Glucose Monitoring System ◽  
Summer Study

Glycemic Variability and Insulin Needs in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Supplemented with Vitamin D: A Pilot Study Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring System

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 395-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karem Mileo Felício ◽  
Ana Carolina Contente Braga de Souza ◽  
Joao Felicio Abrahao Neto ◽  
Franciane Trindade Cunha de Melo ◽  
Carolina Tavares Carvalho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Vitamin D ◽  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Monitoring System ◽  
Continuous Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Glycemic Variability

scholarly journals Influence of Caffeine on Frequency of Hypoglycemia Detected by Continuous Interstitial Glucose Monitoring System in Patients With Long-Standing Type 1 Diabetes

Diabetes Care ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 1316-1320 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Richardson ◽  
P. Thomas ◽  
J. Ryder ◽  
D. Kerr
Keyword(s):  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Monitoring System ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Interstitial Glucose

scholarly journals Glucose Variations During Driving in People With Type 1 Diabetes Using a Continuous Glucose Monitoring System

Diabetes Care ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (7) ◽  
pp. 1340-1343
Author(s):  
Laurent Silvan Schmied ◽  
Henryk Zulewski
Keyword(s):  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Monitoring System ◽  
Continuous Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Continuous Glucose Monitoring System

WHAT IS HYPOGLYCEMIA IN PATIENTS WITH WELL-CONTROLLED TYPE 1 DIABETES TREATED BY SUBCUTANEOUS INSULIN PUMP WITH USE OF THE CONTINUOUS GLUCOSE MONITORING SYSTEM?

2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 324-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Larsen ◽  
Tim Ford ◽  
Elizabeth Lyden ◽  
Chris Colling ◽  
Lynn Mack-Shipman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Monitoring System ◽  
Continuous Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Insulin Pump ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Continuous Glucose Monitoring System ◽  
Subcutaneous Insulin

FreeStyle Libre flash glucose monitoring system in pregnant woman with type 1 diabetes: a focus on accuracy

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (8) ◽  
pp. 969-970
Author(s):  
Milo Gatti ◽  
Anna Maria Letizia Amato ◽  
Daniela Bruttomesso
Keyword(s):  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Pregnant Woman ◽  
Monitoring System ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Flash Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Freestyle Libre ◽  
Flash Glucose Monitoring System
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document