scholarly journals Glycemic Outcome Associated With Insulin Pump and Glucose Sensor Use in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes. Data From the International Pediatric Registry SWEET

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roque Cardona-Hernandez ◽  
Anke Schwandt ◽  
Hessa Alkandari ◽  
Heiko Bratke ◽  
Agata Chobot ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE <p>This study aims to examine insulin delivery methods, glucose monitoring modalities and related outcomes in a large, international, diverse cohort of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes from the SWEET-Registry<sub></sub></p> <p> </p> <p>RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS</p> <p>Participants with type 1 diabetes of <u>></u>1 year of duration, aged ≤18y and documented pump/sensor usage during the period August 2017-July 2019 were stratified into four categories: injections-no sensor (reference); injections+sensor; pump-no sensor; pump+sensor. HbA<sub>1c</sub> and proportion of patients with DKA or SH were analyzed; linear and logistic regression models adjusted for demographics, region and gross-domestic-product (GDP)-per capita were applied.</p> <p> </p> <p>RESULTS</p> <p>Data of 25,654 subjects were analyzed. Injections-no sensor: 37.44% [adjusted-HbA<sub>1c</sub> 8.72 (95%CI 8.68-8.75)]; injections+sensor: 14.98% [adjusted-HbA<sub>1c</sub> 8.30 (8.25-8.35)]; pump-no sensor: 17.22% [adjusted-HbA<sub>1c</sub> 8.07 (8.03-8.12)]; pump+sensor: 30.35% [adjusted-HbA<sub>1c</sub> 7.81 (7.77-7.84)]. HbA<sub>1c</sub> was lower in all categories of subjects using pump and/or sensor compared to injections-no sensor treatment method (p<0.001, respectively). Proportion of DKA episodes was lower in subjects with pump+sensor [1.98 (1.64-2.48); p<0.001] and pump-no sensor [2.02 (1.64-2.48); p<0.05)] when compared to injections-no sensor [2.91 (2.59-3.31)]. Proportion of SH was lower in pump-no sensor [1.10 (0.85-1.43); p<0.001] but higher in the injections+sensor [4.25 (3.65-4.95); p<0.001] compared to injections-no sensor [2.35 (2.04-2.71)].</p> <p> </p> <p>CONCLUSIONS</p> Lower HbA<sub>1c</sub> and fewer DKA episodes were observed in subjects using either a pump, CGM or both. Pump use was associated with lower rate of SH. Across SWEET centers, use of pumps and CGM is increasing. The concomitant use of pump and CGM was found to be associated with an additive benefit.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roque Cardona-Hernandez ◽  
Anke Schwandt ◽  
Hessa Alkandari ◽  
Heiko Bratke ◽  
Agata Chobot ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE <p>This study aims to examine insulin delivery methods, glucose monitoring modalities and related outcomes in a large, international, diverse cohort of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes from the SWEET-Registry<sub></sub></p> <p> </p> <p>RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS</p> <p>Participants with type 1 diabetes of <u>></u>1 year of duration, aged ≤18y and documented pump/sensor usage during the period August 2017-July 2019 were stratified into four categories: injections-no sensor (reference); injections+sensor; pump-no sensor; pump+sensor. HbA<sub>1c</sub> and proportion of patients with DKA or SH were analyzed; linear and logistic regression models adjusted for demographics, region and gross-domestic-product (GDP)-per capita were applied.</p> <p> </p> <p>RESULTS</p> <p>Data of 25,654 subjects were analyzed. Injections-no sensor: 37.44% [adjusted-HbA<sub>1c</sub> 8.72 (95%CI 8.68-8.75)]; injections+sensor: 14.98% [adjusted-HbA<sub>1c</sub> 8.30 (8.25-8.35)]; pump-no sensor: 17.22% [adjusted-HbA<sub>1c</sub> 8.07 (8.03-8.12)]; pump+sensor: 30.35% [adjusted-HbA<sub>1c</sub> 7.81 (7.77-7.84)]. HbA<sub>1c</sub> was lower in all categories of subjects using pump and/or sensor compared to injections-no sensor treatment method (p<0.001, respectively). Proportion of DKA episodes was lower in subjects with pump+sensor [1.98 (1.64-2.48); p<0.001] and pump-no sensor [2.02 (1.64-2.48); p<0.05)] when compared to injections-no sensor [2.91 (2.59-3.31)]. Proportion of SH was lower in pump-no sensor [1.10 (0.85-1.43); p<0.001] but higher in the injections+sensor [4.25 (3.65-4.95); p<0.001] compared to injections-no sensor [2.35 (2.04-2.71)].</p> <p> </p> <p>CONCLUSIONS</p> Lower HbA<sub>1c</sub> and fewer DKA episodes were observed in subjects using either a pump, CGM or both. Pump use was associated with lower rate of SH. Across SWEET centers, use of pumps and CGM is increasing. The concomitant use of pump and CGM was found to be associated with an additive benefit.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roque Cardona-Hernandez ◽  
Anke Schwandt ◽  
Hessa Alkandari ◽  
Heiko Bratke ◽  
Agata Chobot ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE <p>This study aims to examine insulin delivery methods, glucose monitoring modalities and related outcomes in a large, international, diverse cohort of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes from the SWEET-Registry<sub></sub></p> <p> </p> <p>RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS</p> <p>Participants with type 1 diabetes of <u>></u>1 year of duration, aged ≤18y and documented pump/sensor usage during the period August 2017-July 2019 were stratified into four categories: injections-no sensor (reference); injections+sensor; pump-no sensor; pump+sensor. HbA<sub>1c</sub> and proportion of patients with DKA or SH were analyzed; linear and logistic regression models adjusted for demographics, region and gross-domestic-product (GDP)-per capita were applied.</p> <p> </p> <p>RESULTS</p> <p>Data of 25,654 subjects were analyzed. Injections-no sensor: 37.44% [adjusted-HbA<sub>1c</sub> 8.72 (95%CI 8.68-8.75)]; injections+sensor: 14.98% [adjusted-HbA<sub>1c</sub> 8.30 (8.25-8.35)]; pump-no sensor: 17.22% [adjusted-HbA<sub>1c</sub> 8.07 (8.03-8.12)]; pump+sensor: 30.35% [adjusted-HbA<sub>1c</sub> 7.81 (7.77-7.84)]. HbA<sub>1c</sub> was lower in all categories of subjects using pump and/or sensor compared to injections-no sensor treatment method (p<0.001, respectively). Proportion of DKA episodes was lower in subjects with pump+sensor [1.98 (1.64-2.48); p<0.001] and pump-no sensor [2.02 (1.64-2.48); p<0.05)] when compared to injections-no sensor [2.91 (2.59-3.31)]. Proportion of SH was lower in pump-no sensor [1.10 (0.85-1.43); p<0.001] but higher in the injections+sensor [4.25 (3.65-4.95); p<0.001] compared to injections-no sensor [2.35 (2.04-2.71)].</p> <p> </p> <p>CONCLUSIONS</p> Lower HbA<sub>1c</sub> and fewer DKA episodes were observed in subjects using either a pump, CGM or both. Pump use was associated with lower rate of SH. Across SWEET centers, use of pumps and CGM is increasing. The concomitant use of pump and CGM was found to be associated with an additive benefit.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farid H. Mahmud ◽  
Antoine B.M. Clarke ◽  
Kariym C. Joachim ◽  
Esther Assor ◽  
Charlotte McDonald ◽  
...  

<b>Objective</b>: To describe Celiac Disease (CD) screening rates and glycemic outcomes of a gluten-free diet (GFD) in type 1 diabetes patients asymptomatic for CD. <p><b>Research Design and Methods</b>: Asymptomatic patients (8-45 years) were screened for CD. Biopsy-confirmed CD participants were randomized to GFD or gluten-containing diet (GCD) to assess changes in HbA1c and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) over 12 months. </p> <p><b>Results</b>: Adults had higher CD-seropositivity rates than children (6.8%, 95%CI 4.9% to 8.2%, N=1298 vs. 4.7%; 95%CI 3.4% to 5.9%, N=1089, p=0.035) with lower rates of prior CD-screening (6.9% vs 44.2%, p<0.0001). 51 participants were randomized to a GFD (N=27) or GCD (N=24). No HbA1c differences were seen between groups (+0.14%, 1.5mmol/mol; 95%CI: -0.79 to 1.08; p=0.76) although greater post-prandial glucose increases (4-hr +1.5mmol/L; 95%CI: 0.4 to 2.7; p=0.014) emerged with a GFD.</p> <p><b>Conclusions</b>: CD is frequently observed in asymptomatic patients with type 1 diabetes and clinical vigilance is warranted with initiation of a GFD. </p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document