scholarly journals Important Drop Rate of Acute Diabetes Complications in People With Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes After Initiation of Flash Glucose Monitoring in France: The RELIEF Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronan Roussel ◽  
Jean-Pierre Riveline ◽  
Eric Vicaut ◽  
Gérard de Pouvourville ◽  
Bruno Detournay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Diabetes Complications ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Flash Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Freestyle Libre ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Acute Diabetes

<b>Objective</b> <p>The RELIEF study assessed rates of hospitalization for acute diabetes complications in France, before and after initiating the FreeStyle Libre system. </p> <p><b>Research Design and Methods</b></p> <p>74,011 patients with type 1 diabetes or type 2 diabetes who initiated the FreeStyle Libre system were identified from the French national claim database (SNDS) using ICD-10 codes, from hospitalizations with diabetes as a contributing diagnosis, or the prescription of insulin. Patients were sub-classified based on SMBG strip-acquisition prior to starting FreeStyle Libre. Hospitalizations for DKA, severe hypoglycemia, diabetes-related coma and hyperglycemia were recorded for the 12 months before and after initiation. </p> <p><b>Results</b></p> <p>Hospitalizations for acute diabetes complications fell in type 1 diabetes (-49.0%) and in type 2 diabetes (-39.4%) following FreeStyle Libre initiation. DKA fell in type 1 diabetes (-56.2%,) and in type 2 diabetes (-52.1%), as did diabetes-related comas in type 1 diabetes (-39.6%) and in type 2 diabetes (-31.9%). Hospitalizations for hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia decreased in type 2 diabetes (-10.8% and -26.5%, respectively). Before initiation, hospitalizations were most marked for people non-compliant with SMBG and for those with highest acquisition of SMBG, which fell by -54.0% and 51.2% respectively following FreeStyle Libre initiation. Persistence with FreeStyle Libre at 12 months was 98.1%.</p> <p><b>Conclusions</b></p> <p>This large retrospective study on hospitalizations for acute diabetes complication shows that a significantly lower incidence of admissions for DKA and for diabetes-related coma is associated with use of flash glucose monitoring. This study has significant implications for patient-centered diabetes care and potentially for long-term health economic outcomes.</p> <br> <p> </p>

scholarly journals Important Drop Rate of Acute Diabetes Complications in People With Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes After Initiation of Flash Glucose Monitoring in France: The RELIEF Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronan Roussel ◽  
Jean-Pierre Riveline ◽  
Eric Vicaut ◽  
Gérard de Pouvourville ◽  
Bruno Detournay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Diabetes Complications ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Flash Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Freestyle Libre ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Acute Diabetes

<b>Objective</b> <p>The RELIEF study assessed rates of hospitalization for acute diabetes complications in France, before and after initiating the FreeStyle Libre system. </p> <p><b>Research Design and Methods</b></p> <p>74,011 patients with type 1 diabetes or type 2 diabetes who initiated the FreeStyle Libre system were identified from the French national claim database (SNDS) using ICD-10 codes, from hospitalizations with diabetes as a contributing diagnosis, or the prescription of insulin. Patients were sub-classified based on SMBG strip-acquisition prior to starting FreeStyle Libre. Hospitalizations for DKA, severe hypoglycemia, diabetes-related coma and hyperglycemia were recorded for the 12 months before and after initiation. </p> <p><b>Results</b></p> <p>Hospitalizations for acute diabetes complications fell in type 1 diabetes (-49.0%) and in type 2 diabetes (-39.4%) following FreeStyle Libre initiation. DKA fell in type 1 diabetes (-56.2%,) and in type 2 diabetes (-52.1%), as did diabetes-related comas in type 1 diabetes (-39.6%) and in type 2 diabetes (-31.9%). Hospitalizations for hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia decreased in type 2 diabetes (-10.8% and -26.5%, respectively). Before initiation, hospitalizations were most marked for people non-compliant with SMBG and for those with highest acquisition of SMBG, which fell by -54.0% and 51.2% respectively following FreeStyle Libre initiation. Persistence with FreeStyle Libre at 12 months was 98.1%.</p> <p><b>Conclusions</b></p> <p>This large retrospective study on hospitalizations for acute diabetes complication shows that a significantly lower incidence of admissions for DKA and for diabetes-related coma is associated with use of flash glucose monitoring. This study has significant implications for patient-centered diabetes care and potentially for long-term health economic outcomes.</p> <br> <p> </p>

Important Drop Rate of Acute Diabetes Complications in People With Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes After Initiation of Flash Glucose Monitoring in France: The RELIEF Study

Diabetes Care ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. dc201690
Author(s):  
Ronan Roussel ◽  
Jean-Pierre Riveline ◽  
Eric Vicaut ◽  
Gérard de Pouvourville ◽  
Bruno Detournay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Diabetes Complications ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Flash Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Acute Diabetes ◽  
Drop Rate

68-LB: Acute Diabetes Events and All-Cause Hospitalizations among Continuous Glucose Monitoring Device Recipients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes: A Comparison of FreeStyle Libre and Dexcom

Diabetes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 70 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 68-LB
Author(s):  
IRL B. HIRSCH ◽  
GREGORY J. ROBERTS ◽  
JENNIFER JOSEPH ◽  
YELENA NABUTOVSKY ◽  
NAUNIHAL VIRDI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Continuous Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Monitoring Device ◽  
Freestyle Libre ◽  
Acute Diabetes

scholarly journals Effects of Flash Glucose Monitoring on Dietary Variety, Physical Activity, and Self-Care Behaviors in Patients with Diabetes

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Satoshi Ida ◽  
Ryutaro Kaneko ◽  
Kanako Imataka ◽  
Kaoru Okubo ◽  
Yoshitaka Shirakura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Flash Glucose Monitoring

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of flash glucose monitoring on dietary variety, physical activity, and self-care behavior in patients with diabetes. This study included outpatients with diabetes using insulin who presented at the Department of Diabetes and Metabolism of the Ise Red Cross Hospital. Before initiating flash glucose monitoring and 12 weeks after its initiation, blood glucose-related parameters were assessed and self-administered questionnaires were completed (Dietary Variety Score (DVS), the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities Measure (SDSCA), and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)) and compared between the two time points. We analyzed 42 patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and 48 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, but not type 1 diabetes mellitus, there was an increase in moderate/high category scores for IPAQ (P<0.001) and for treatment satisfaction reported via DTSQ. Furthermore, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, the glycemic excursion index improved significantly and HbA1c decreased significantly (from 7.7 (1.2) to 7.4 (0.8), P=0.025). Results showed that standard deviation and mean amplitude of glycemic excursions significantly decreased in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (from 71.2 (20.4) to 66.2 (17.5), P=0.033 and from 124.6 (31.9) to 108.1 (28.4), P<0.001, respectively). Flash glucose monitoring is a useful tool to improve physical activity in patients with type 2 diabetes.

scholarly journals Practical Considerations for Initiating and Utilizing Flash Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Clinical Practice

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol H Wysham ◽  
Davida F Kruger
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Treatment Adherence ◽  
Continuous Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Freestyle Libre ◽  
The Us

Abstract Use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has been shown to improve clinical outcomes in type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D), including improved glycemic control, better treatment adherence and an increased understanding of their treatment regimens. Retrospective analysis of CGM data allows clinicians and patients to identify glycemic patterns that support and facilitate informed therapy adjustments. There are currently two types of CGM systems: real-time CGM (rtCGM) and flash CGM. The FreeStyle Libre 2 (FLS2) is the newest flash CGM system commercially available. Because the FLS2 system was only recently cleared for use in the US, many endocrinologists and diabetes specialists may be unfamiliar with strengths, limitations and potential of the FSL2 system. This article focuses on practical approaches and strategies for initiating and using flash CGM in endocrinology and diabetes specialty practices.

scholarly journals A review of flash glucose monitoring in type 2 diabetes

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcio Krakauer ◽  
Jose Fernando Botero ◽  
Fernando J. Lavalle-González ◽  
Adrian Proietti ◽  
Douglas Eugenio Barbieri
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Insulin Therapy ◽  
Real World ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Main Body ◽  
Flash Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Glucose Levels ◽  
Freestyle Libre

Abstract Background Continuous glucose monitoring systems are increasingly being adopted as an alternative to self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) by persons with diabetes mellitus receiving insulin therapy. Main body The FreeStyle Libre flash glucose monitoring system (Abbott Diabetes Care, Witney, United Kingdom) consists of a factory-calibrated sensor worn on the back of the arm which measures glucose levels in the interstitial fluid every minute and stores the reading automatically every 15 min. Swiping the reader device over the sensor retrieves stored data and displays current interstitial glucose levels, a glucose trend arrow, and a graph of glucose readings over the preceding 8 h. In patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) receiving insulin therapy, pivotal efficacy data were provided by the 6-month REPLACE randomized controlled trial (RCT) and 6-month extension study. Compared to SMBG, the flash system significantly reduced the time spent in hypoglycemia and frequency of hypoglycemic events, although no significant change was observed in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. Subsequent RCTs and real-world chart review studies have since shown that flash glucose monitoring significantly reduces HbA1c from baseline. Real-world studies in both type 1 diabetes or T2D populations also showed that flash glucose monitoring improved glycemic control. Higher (versus lower) scanning frequency was associated with significantly greater reductions in HbA1c and significant improvements in other measures such as time spent in hypoglycemia, time spent in hyperglycemia, and time in range. Additional benefits associated with flash glucose monitoring versus SMBG include reductions in acute diabetes events, all-cause hospitalizations and hospitalized ketoacidosis episodes; improved well-being and decreased disease burden; and greater treatment satisfaction. Conclusion T2D patients who use flash glucose monitoring might expect to achieve significant improvement in HbA1c and glycemic parameters and several associated benefits.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document