scholarly journals Effect of Metformin and Lifestyle Interventions on Mortality in the Diabetes Prevention Program and Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study

Author(s):  
Christine G. Lee ◽  
Brandy Heckman-Stoddard ◽  
Dana Dabelea ◽  
Kishore M. Gadde ◽  
David Ehrmann ◽  
...  

<b>Objective: </b>To determine whether metformin or lifestyle modification can lower rates of all-cause and cause-specific mortality in the Diabetes Prevention Program and Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study. <p><b>Research Design and Methods: </b>From 1996-1999,<b> </b>3234 adults at high risk for type 2 diabetes were randomized to an intensive lifestyle intervention, masked metformin or placebo. Placebo and lifestyle interventions stopped in 2001, and a modified lifestyle program was offered to everyone, but unmasked study metformin continued in those originally randomized.<b> </b>Causes of deaths through December 31, 2018 were adjudicated by blinded reviews. All-cause and cause-specific mortality hazard ratios were estimated from Cox-proportional hazard regression models and Fine-Gray models, respectively.</p> <p><b>Results:</b> Over a median of 21 (IQR 20-21) years, 453 participants died. Cancer was the leading cause of death (n=170), followed by cardiovascular disease (n=131). Compared to placebo, metformin did not influence mortality from all causes (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.79, 1.25), cancer (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.72, 1.52) or cardiovascular disease (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.70, 1.66). Similarly, lifestyle modification did not impact all-cause (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.81, 1.28), cancer (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.74, 1.55) or cardiovascular disease (HR 1.18, 95% CI 0.77, 1.81) mortality. Analyses adjusted for diabetes status and duration, body mass index, cumulative glycemic exposure, and cardiovascular risks yielded similar results for all-cause mortality.</p> <p><b>Conclusions: </b>Cancer was the leading cause of mortality among adults at high risk for type 2 diabetes. Although metformin and lifestyle modification prevented diabetes, neither strategy reduced all-cause, cancer, or cardiovascular mortality rates.</p>

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine G. Lee ◽  
Brandy Heckman-Stoddard ◽  
Dana Dabelea ◽  
Kishore M. Gadde ◽  
David Ehrmann ◽  
...  

<b>Objective: </b>To determine whether metformin or lifestyle modification can lower rates of all-cause and cause-specific mortality in the Diabetes Prevention Program and Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study. <p><b>Research Design and Methods: </b>From 1996-1999,<b> </b>3234 adults at high risk for type 2 diabetes were randomized to an intensive lifestyle intervention, masked metformin or placebo. Placebo and lifestyle interventions stopped in 2001, and a modified lifestyle program was offered to everyone, but unmasked study metformin continued in those originally randomized.<b> </b>Causes of deaths through December 31, 2018 were adjudicated by blinded reviews. All-cause and cause-specific mortality hazard ratios were estimated from Cox-proportional hazard regression models and Fine-Gray models, respectively.</p> <p><b>Results:</b> Over a median of 21 (IQR 20-21) years, 453 participants died. Cancer was the leading cause of death (n=170), followed by cardiovascular disease (n=131). Compared to placebo, metformin did not influence mortality from all causes (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.79, 1.25), cancer (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.72, 1.52) or cardiovascular disease (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.70, 1.66). Similarly, lifestyle modification did not impact all-cause (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.81, 1.28), cancer (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.74, 1.55) or cardiovascular disease (HR 1.18, 95% CI 0.77, 1.81) mortality. Analyses adjusted for diabetes status and duration, body mass index, cumulative glycemic exposure, and cardiovascular risks yielded similar results for all-cause mortality.</p> <p><b>Conclusions: </b>Cancer was the leading cause of mortality among adults at high risk for type 2 diabetes. Although metformin and lifestyle modification prevented diabetes, neither strategy reduced all-cause, cancer, or cardiovascular mortality rates.</p>


Diabetes Care ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. dc211046
Author(s):  
Christine G. Lee ◽  
Brandy Heckman-Stoddard ◽  
Dana Dabelea ◽  
Kishore M. Gadde ◽  
David Ehrmann ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e000619
Author(s):  
Nikki J Garner ◽  
Melanie Pascale ◽  
Kalman France ◽  
Clare Ferns ◽  
Allan Clark ◽  
...  

ObjectiveIntensive lifestyle interventions reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes in populations at highest risk, but staffing levels are usually unable to meet the challenge of delivering effective prevention strategies to a very large at-risk population. Training volunteers with existing type 2 diabetes to support healthcare professionals deliver lifestyle interventions is an attractive option.MethodsWe identified 141 973 people at highest risk of diabetes in the East of England, screened 12 778, and randomized 1764 into a suite of type 2 diabetes prevention and screen detected type 2 diabetes management trials. A key element of the program tested the value of volunteers with type 2 diabetes, trained to act as diabetes prevention mentors (DPM) when added to an intervention arm delivered by healthcare professionals trained to support participant lifestyle change.ResultsWe invited 9951 people with type 2 diabetes to become DPM and 427 responded (4.3%). Of these, 356 (83.3%) were interviewed by phone, and of these 131 (36.8%) were interviewed in person. We then appointed 104 of these 131 interviewed applicants (79%) to the role (mean age 62 years, 55% (n=57) male). All DPMs volunteered for a total of 2895 months, and made 6879 telephone calls to 461 randomized participants. Seventy-six (73%) DPMs volunteered for at least 6 months and 66 (73%) for at least 1 year.DiscussionIndividuals with type 2 diabetes can be recruited, trained and retained as DPM in large numbers to support a group-based diabetes prevention program delivered by healthcare professionals. This volunteer model is low cost, and accesses the large type 2 diabetes population that shares a lifestyle experience with the target population. This is an attractive model for supporting diabetes prevention efforts.


Diabetologia ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 60 (9) ◽  
pp. 1601-1611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanita R. Aroda ◽  
◽  
William C. Knowler ◽  
Jill P. Crandall ◽  
Leigh Perreault ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document