scholarly journals Comparison of Proximal Contacts of Class II Resin Composite Restorations In Vitro

2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 688-693 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. A. C. Loomans ◽  
N. J. M. Opdam ◽  
F. J. M. Roeters ◽  
E. M. Bronkhorst ◽  
R. C. W. Burgersdijk

Clinical Relevance When placing a Class II resin composite restoration, the use of sectional matrix systems and separation rings to obtain tight proximal contacts is recommended.

2011 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Laegreid ◽  
NR Gjerdet ◽  
PV von Steyern ◽  
A-K Johansson

Clinical Relevance The presence of enamel at the cervical margin of a class II preparation increases the fracture strength of the composite restoration at the marginal ridge, but fractures are more complicated when they occur.


10.2341/08-91 ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 306-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Sadeghi ◽  
C. D. Lynch

Clinical Relevance The use of a flowable resin composite or compomer may reduce microleakage at the gingival floor of a deep Class II composite restoration that extends apical to the cemento-enamel junction.


10.2341/06-86 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 298-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. El-Mowafy ◽  
W. El-Badrawy ◽  
A. Eltanty ◽  
K. Abbasi ◽  
N. Habib

Clinical Relevance Fiber inserts incorporated at the gingival floor of Class II composite restorations resulted in a significant reduction of microleakage scores as compared to restorations made without inserts. This may lead to a reduced incidence of recurrent caries.


10.2341/06-16 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Idriss ◽  
T. Abduljabbar ◽  
C. Habib ◽  
R. Omar

Clinical Relevance Even though marginal gap size was not shown to be a direct predictor for the extent of microleakage in resin composite restorations, both material and placement technique appear to be important determinants in microleakage and, thus, probably in clinical outcomes.


2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (04) ◽  
pp. 1550057
Author(s):  
WEN-JEN CHANG ◽  
YEN-HSIANG CHANG ◽  
HSUAN WANG ◽  
CHUN-LI LIN

This study used a newly developed proximal contact strength (PCS) device to evaluate the tightness of proximal tooth contact for Class II cavity size restoration with different materials using an auxiliary separation ring system. A measurement device based on the equilibrium of forces acted on the clamp rod converts a pull-out force between interdental spaces on a force sensing resistor to express the PCS. This device was designed using dental floss as the test end and can be moved with constant speed during measurement through a bevel gear that transforms the rotation of motor shaft into linear movement of clamp rod. A manikin model was used with 60 artificial first molars in which an mesial occlusal (MO) preparation was ground. Samples were divided into six groups (each n = 10) for simulating amalgam and resin composite restoration with three different cavity sizes. The different cavities were defined using the ratio of the actual isthmus width to the intercuspal width (W) to 1/3, 2/3 and 1. The PCS value in each sample was measured after restoration. The result showed that the mean PCS value and standard deviation were 2283.1 ± 216.5 gf, 2419.1 ± 375 gf and 1737.6 ± 372.7 g for 1/3 W, 2/3 W and W cavities of the amalgam restoration, respectively. The corresponding PCS values were 1178.0 ± 230.4 gf, 1205.8 ± 249.1 gf and 1247.0 ± 157.5 gf for 1/3 W, 2/3 W and W cavities of the resin composite restoration. PCS values with amalgam restoration were larger than those for resin composite restorations under the same cavity size. Large cavity (W) PCS might be lost with amalgam restoration. No significant difference was found in resin composite restoration PCS among the different cavity sizes.


2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 454-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Kampouropoulos ◽  
C. Paximada ◽  
M. Loukidis ◽  
A. Kakaboura

Clinical Relevance The types of matrices assessed, metal or transparent, circumferential or sectional, straight or pre-contoured, were not able to adequately reconstruct all the characteristics of the proximal contact area of an intact tooth in Class II resin composite restorations.


2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. H. Saber ◽  
A. C. Loomans ◽  
A. El Zohairy ◽  
C. E. Dörfer ◽  
W. El-Badrawy

Clinical Relevance The use of sectional matrix bands combined with a separation ring and wedge is recommended to reconstruct the proximal contact area of Class II resin composite restorations


2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 629-635 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. R. Schmidlin ◽  
T. Huber ◽  
T. N. Göhring ◽  
T. Attin ◽  
A. Bindl

Clinical Relevance Within the limitations of the current study, the use of glass ionomer liners improves the margin quality of Class I resin composite restorations and reduces leakage.


2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Hofmann ◽  
A. Hunecke

Clinical Relevance Selection of photo-curing protocol (high intensity vs soft-start) and matrix type (transparent vs metal) did not influence the margin quality and marginal seal of Class II resin-based composite restorations.


10.2341/07-99 ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Deliperi

Clinical Relevance The proper utilization of fiber-reinforced resin composite restorations in endodontically-treated molars may preclude the use of more extensive restorative treatment, possibly delaying the need for expensive indirect restorations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document