The Effect of Different Restoration Techniques on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically-treated Molars

2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 526-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. K. Cobankara ◽  
N. Unlu ◽  
A. R. Cetin ◽  
H. B. Ozkan

Clinical Relevance To restore endodontically-treated molars, the use of indirect hybrid inlay restorations may be recommended due to their more favorable fracture failure modes compared with amalgam, resin composite and fiber-reinforced resin composite restoration techniques and their greater fracture resistance compared with amalgam restorations.

10.2341/07-99 ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Deliperi

Clinical Relevance The proper utilization of fiber-reinforced resin composite restorations in endodontically-treated molars may preclude the use of more extensive restorative treatment, possibly delaying the need for expensive indirect restorations.


2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 688-693 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. A. C. Loomans ◽  
N. J. M. Opdam ◽  
F. J. M. Roeters ◽  
E. M. Bronkhorst ◽  
R. C. W. Burgersdijk

Clinical Relevance When placing a Class II resin composite restoration, the use of sectional matrix systems and separation rings to obtain tight proximal contacts is recommended.


2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 655-662 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Özcan ◽  
G. Schoonbeek ◽  
B. Gökçe ◽  
E. Çömlekoglu ◽  
M. Dündar

Clinical Relevance For reliable repair of amalgam restorations, including dentin fractures, the amalgam surface should first be silica coated; dentin/enamel should be etched, washed and rinsed thoroughly. Then, amalgam should be silanized and primer/bonding should be applied onto dentin.


2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 510-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. S. Oskoee ◽  
P. A. Oskoee ◽  
E. J. Navimipour ◽  
S. Shahi

Clinical Relevance Horizontal pins alone, or with flowable composite, have no effect on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated maxillary premolars restored with resin composite.


10.2341/08-5 ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 666-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. A. Imbery ◽  
J. Coudron ◽  
P. C. Moon

Clinical Relevance Amalgam bonding agents provided as much retention and resistance for extensive amalgam restorations as traditional mechanical methods of retention.


Dental Update ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 524-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
F J Trevor Burke ◽  
Louis Mackenzie ◽  
Adrian CC Shortall

The use of resin composite for routine restoration of cavities in posterior teeth is now commonplace, and will increase further following the Minamata Agreement and patient requests for tooth-coloured restorations in their posterior teeth. It is therefore relevant to evaluate the published survival rates of such restorations. A Medline search identified 144 possible studies, this being reduced to 24 when inclusion criteria were introduced. Of these, ten directly compared amalgam and composite, eight were cohort studies, and six were systematic reviews. It was concluded that posterior composites may provide restorations of satisfactory longevity and with survival rates generally similar to those published on amalgam restorations. However, the ability of the operator in placing the restoration may have a profound effect. CPD/Clinical Relevance: With the increasing use of composite for restorations in posterior teeth, it is relevant to note that these may provide good rates for survival.


2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Schmeling ◽  
A. Meyer-Filho ◽  
M. A. C. Andrada ◽  
L. N. Baratieri

Clinical Relevance Value resin composites used to replace enamel can induce a brightness decrease in stratified composite restoration techniques.


10.2341/08-91 ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 306-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Sadeghi ◽  
C. D. Lynch

Clinical Relevance The use of a flowable resin composite or compomer may reduce microleakage at the gingival floor of a deep Class II composite restoration that extends apical to the cemento-enamel junction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document