scholarly journals Dual-Cured Etch-and-Rinse Adhesive Systems Increase the Bond Durability of Direct Coronal Dentin Restorations

2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 512-518 ◽  
Author(s):  
BCD Borges ◽  
ARRC Vilela ◽  
CA da Silva-Junior ◽  
EJ Souza-Junior ◽  
MAC Sinhoreti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscopy Data ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Microscopy Data ◽  
Bond Durability

SUMMARY This study aimed to evaluate the bond durability of dentin restorations bonded with light- or dual-cured etch-and-rinse adhesive systems. A three-step adhesive system (Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus), an acetone-based two-step adhesive system (Prime & Bond 2.1), and an ethanol-based two-step adhesive system (Excite) were tested. Both the light- and the dual-cured versions were evaluated. High C-factor dentin cavities were prepared on 120 bovine incisors, which were then restored with resin composite (n=10). The samples were stored in water for 24 hours, and half of them were subjected to additional degradation with 10% NaOCl for five hours. The push-out bond strength test was performed in a universal testing machine until failure. Failure modes were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. Data were analyzed by three-way analysis of variance and Tukey tests (p<0.05). The dual-cured adhesive system presented a higher immediate bond strength and durability than those that were light cured. The three-step adhesive system produced the highest values, whereas the acetone-based adhesive system produced the lowest result. Therefore, the use of dual-cured etch-and-rinse adhesive systems can induce increased bond durability to direct coronal dentin restorations.

scholarly journals Effect Of Chitosan Treatment On Shear Bond Strength Of Composite To Deep Dentin Using Self-Etch And Total-Etch Adhesive Systems

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fateme Vasei ◽  
Farahnaz Sharafeddin
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Single Bond ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Self Etch

Objective: To assess the shear bond strength (SBS) of resin composite to deep dentin, using 1 and 2.5% chitosan pretreatment as well as different adhesive systems. Material and Methods: 80 human maxillary molars were randomly divided to eight groups according to the type of adhesive system and dentin pretreatment (n = 10): I) two-step self-etch system (Clearfil SE bond); II) two-step etch-andrinse system (Adper single bond 2); III) 2.5% chitosan + Clearfil SE bond; IV) 2.5% chitosan +etch + Adper single bond 2; V) etch + 2.5% chitosan + Adper single bond 2; VI) 1% chitosan + Clearfil SE bond; VII) 1% chitosan + etch + Adper single bond 2; VIII) etch + 1% chitosan + Adper single bond 2 (chitosan solution (w/v): 2.5 g and 1 g of chitosan (Sigma Aldrich, USA) was dissolved in 100 ml of 1% acetic acid). Plastic molds were positioned on dentin and filled with composite (Z350, 3M ESPE, USA). SBS (MPa) was tested using a universal testing machine. ANOVA tests, Tukey’s test, and independent t test were used to analyze data (p < 0.05). Results: The highest SBS value among self-etch groups was observed with 1% chitosan (p = 0.001). In the etch-and-rinse group, the SBS of 1% chitosan was significantly lower than the other groups. Chitosan treatment following acid etching led to higher SBS in comparison to when chitosan was applied before etching, with the significant difference in 1% concentration (p = 0.030). A predominance of mix fractures was observed in dentin. Conclusion: Improved dentin bond strength can be achieved through immediate dentin pretreatment with 1% chitosan in self-etch adhesive systems. Chitosan Pretreatment may not be advantageous for etch-and-rinse adhesive systems. Keywords Adhesive system; Chitosan; Deep dentin; Shear strength.

scholarly journals Shear Bond Strength of Brackets Rebonded with a Fluoride-Releasing and -Recharging Adhesive System

2009 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 564-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiya Endo ◽  
Rieko Ozoe ◽  
Koichi Shinkai ◽  
Makiko Aoyagi ◽  
Hiroomi Kurokawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Bond Failure ◽  
Minimum Requirement ◽  
Adhesive Remnant Index ◽  
Bond Strengths

Abstract Objective: To ascertain the effects of repeated bonding on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a fluoride-releasing and -recharging adhesive system with a self-etching primer in comparison with two other types of adhesive system. Materials and Methods: A total of 48 premolars were collected and divided equally into three groups of 16. Each group was assigned one of three adhesive systems: Transbond XT, Transbond Plus, or a fluoride-releasing and -recharging adhesive system, Beauty Ortho Bond. Shear bond strength was measured 24 hours after bracket bonding, with the bonding/debonding procedures repeated twice after the first debonding. A universal testing machine was used to determine shear bond strengths, and bracket/adhesive failure modes were evaluated with the adhesive remnant index after each debonding. Results: At every debonding sequence, all of these three adhesive systems had a shear bond strength of 6 MPa, which is a minimum requirement for clinical use. Transbond XT and Transbond Plus had significantly higher mean shear bond strengths than did Beauty Ortho Bond at each debonding. No significant differences in mean bond strength were observed between the three debondings in each adhesive system. Bond failure at the enamel/adhesive interface occurred more frequently in Beauty Ortho Bond than in Transbond XT or Transbond Plus. Conclusions: The fluoride-releasing and -recharging adhesive system with the self-etching primer (Beauty Ortho Bond) had clinically sufficient shear bond strength in repeated bracket bonding; this finding can help orthodontists to decrease the risk of damage to enamel at debonding.

scholarly journals Aplikasi klorheksidin glukonat 2%pada dentin tidak mempengaruhi kuat rekat geserkomposit resinyangmenggunakansistem adesif self etch (2% Chlorhexidine gluconate application on dentine does not affect bond strength of resin composite using self etch adhesive system)

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
Dewi Puspitasari ◽  
Andi Soufyan ◽  
Ellyza Herda
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Chlorhexidine Gluconate ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Group I ◽  
Self Etch

Composite resin is a widely used aesthetic restoration. The restoration can fail due to secondary caries. Chlorhexidinegluconate 2% is used as a cavity disinfectant to eliminate microorganisms on the prepared cavity and to prevent thesecondary caries. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of chlorhexidine gluconate 2% to the bondstrength of composite resin with self etch system adhesive on dentine. Sixteen specimens of buccal dentine of premolarscrown are divided into 2 different groups. Group I: Clearfil SE Bond self-etch primer was applied for 20 seconds,Clearfil SE Bond bonding was applied for 5 seconds and polymerized for 10 seconds. Composite resin was constructedincrementally and polymerized for 20 seconds. Group II: prior to self etch primer application as in group I,chlorhexidine gluconate 2% was applied for 15 seconds. Shear bond strength was tested using Testing machine andanalyzed with unpaired T test. The highest shear bond strength was obtained by applying chlorhexidine gluconate 2%.The study concludes that chlorhexidine gluconate 2% application to dentine did not affect significantly to the bondstrength composite resin using self etch adhesive systems.

scholarly journals Chitosan in different concentrations added to a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system: influence on bond strength to dentin

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 55
Author(s):  
Rafael Avellar de Carvalho Nunes ◽  
Flávia Lucisano Botelho do Amaral ◽  
Fabiana Mantovani Gomes França ◽  
Cecilia Pedroso Turssi ◽  
Roberta Tarkany Basting
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Failure Mode ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Fracture Pattern ◽  
Test Machine ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Strength Tests

<p class="Corpo"><strong>Objective</strong>: the aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of adding different concentrations of chitosan to an experimental two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system on the bond strength and failure mode to dentin. <strong>Material</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Methods</strong>: thirty-two flat dentin surfaces were obtained from extracted human third molars and divided into four groups  (n=8) for application of the adhesive systems: AD - conventional two-step adhesive system (Adper Single Bond 2); EXP – experimental two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system; Chi0.2% - EXP with addition of 0.2% Chitosan; Chi0.5% - EXP with addition of 0.5% Chitosan. Resin composite build-ups were made and the composite/dentin specimens were sectioned to obtain rectangular beams with a bond area of approximately 1mm<sup>2</sup>. After 24 hours, the sticks were submitted to microtensile bond strength tests in a universal test machine. The fracture pattern was evaluated under a stereoscopic loupe at 40X magnification. <strong>Results</strong>: one-way analysis of variance showed that the type of adhesive system had no significant effect on the bond strength values (p = 0.142), showing the mean bond strength values (standard deviation), in MPa, for the groups as follows: AD=20.1 (5.4); EXP=16.6 (2.3); Chi0.2%=16.1 (2.8); Chi0.5%=16.9 (2.3). In all the groups there was predominance of cohesive fractures in dentin, representing 68 to 82% of the failure modes. <strong>Conclusion</strong>: the addition of 0.2 or 0.5% of chitosan had no influence on the bond strength and failure mode of an experimental two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system to dentin.</p><p class="Corpo"><strong>Keywords</strong></p><p class="Corpo">Chitosan; Dental Adhesives; Failure Mode; Microtensile Bond Strength.</p>

scholarly journals Effect of Different Adhesion Protocols on the Shear Bond Strength of Universal Adhesive Systems to Sound and Artificial Caries-Affected Dentin

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omnia M. Sami ◽  
Essam A. Naguib ◽  
Rasha H. Afifi ◽  
Shaymaa M. Nagi
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Single Bond ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Universal Adhesive ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Self Etch

Abstract Objective Bonding to different dentin substrates influences resin composite restoration outcomes. This study investigated the influence of different adhesion protocols on the shear bond strength of universal adhesive systems to sound and artificial caries-affected dentin (CAD). Materials and Methods Occlusal enamel of 80 premolars were wet grinded to obtain flat midcoronal dentin. Specimens were equally divided according to the substrate condition: sound and CAD by subjecting to pH-cycling for 14 days. Each dentin substrate was bonded with the adhesive systems used in this study: Single Bond universal adhesive or Prime&Bond universal (applied either in etch-and-rinse or self-etch adhesion protocol). Adhesive systems were utilized according to manufacturers’ instructions, then resin composite was built up. Specimens were tested for shear bond strength. The data were analyzed by three-way analysis of variance, and failure modes were determined using stereomicroscope. Results There was no statistically significant difference between the two tested adhesive systems on artificially created CAD with different adhesion protocols. On sound dentin, Single Bond universal, either in the etch-and-rinse or self-etch adhesion protocols, revealed higher statistically significant shear bond strength mean values compared with CAD. Conclusion Single Bond universal adhesive in an etch-and-rinse adhesion protocol improved only bonding to sound dentin, while no added positive effect for the etching step with Prime&Bond universal adhesive was found when bonded to both sound and CAD substrates. The influence of CAD on the performance of the universal adhesives was material-dependent.

scholarly journals Effect of Fluoride and Simplified Adhesive Systems on the Bond Strength of Primary Molars and Incisors

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 368-373
Author(s):  
Leily Macedo Firoozmand ◽  
Lawanne Ellen Carvalho Noleto ◽  
Isabella Azevedo Gomes ◽  
José Roberto de Oliveira Bauer ◽  
Meire Coelho Ferreira
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Group Analysis ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Primary Molars ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Prior Application

<p>The aim of this study was evaluate in vitro the influence of simplified adhesive systems (etch-and-rinse and self-etching) and 1.23% acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF) on the microshear bond strength (μ-SBS) of composite resins on primary molars and incisors. Forty primary molars and forty incisors vestibular enamel was treated with either the self-etching Clearfil SE Bond (CSE, Kuraray) or etch-and-rinse Adper Single Bond 2 (SB2, 3M/ESPE) adhesive system. Each group was subdivided based on the prior treatment of the enamel with or without the topical application of 1.23% APF. Thereafter, matrices were positioned and filled with composite resin and light cured. After storage in distilled water at 37±1°C for 24 h, the specimens were submitted to μ-SBS in a universal testing machine. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests (p<0.05) showed that the prior application of 1.23% APF led to a significant reduction in bond strength. The type of adhesive exerted no significant influence bond strength. In the inter-group analysis, however, significantly bond strength reduction was found for the incisors when CSE was employed with APF. Adhesive failure was the most common type of fracture. The bond strength was affected by the prior application of 1.23% APF and type of tooth.</p>

scholarly journals Adhesive systems effect over bond strength of resin-infiltrated and de/remineralized enamel

F1000Research ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 1743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Buhler Borges ◽  
Amjad Abu Hasna ◽  
Amanda Guedes Nogueira Matuda ◽  
Stephanie Ribeiro Lopes ◽  
Ana Paula Valente Pinho Mafetano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Artificial Saliva ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Bonding Agents ◽  
Thermomechanical Cycling ◽  
Resin Infiltration ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Demineralized Enamel

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different bonding agents on bond-strength to demineralized enamel after remineralizing treatments and resin infiltration. Methods: Buccal enamel of 120 bovine incisors was polished and then were divided into five experimental groups: SE (sound enamel); DE (demineralized enamel); AS (demineralized enamel immersed in artificial saliva for eight weeks); NaF (demineralized enamel treated with 0.05% sodium fluoride solution (one minute) for eight weeks); Ic (demineralized enamel infiltrated with a low-viscosity resin (Icon-DGM). These groups were subdivided according to adhesive system used: self-etching adhesive Adper Easy One (3M/ESPE) and etch-and-rinse adhesive Single Bond (3M/ESPE). The composite resin blocks were fabricated using a Teflon matrix. A thermomechanical cycling machine was used to carry out the artificial aging of the specimens and thus were sectioned into sticks. The microtensile tests were performed using a universal testing machine at a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min. Data (in MPa) were subjected to two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s tests (5%). Results: Significant differences were found for both factors tested and interactions (p<0.05). Tukey’s test results of µTBS (mean ± SD) were: etch-and-rinse SE (28.79±3.93); DE (30.41±7.22); AS (29.03±3.33); NaF (29.81±4.06)a; Ic (29.47±5.5);  and self-etching SE (30.37±6.96); DE (14.62±4.47); AS (9.79±2.32); NaF (9.36±2.31); Ic (30.78±8.68).   Conclusions: Resin infiltration did not affect the bond strength of demineralized enamel for both adhesive systems tested. For etch-and-rinse adhesive, no differences were observed for the tested groups. For self-etching adhesive, only the resin-infiltrated group showed similar bond strength to sound enamel. Both etch-and-rinse and self-etching adhesive systems can be used in resin-infiltrated enamel, if a composite restoration needs to be further performed. In enamel that has undergone the de/remineralization process, the use of a total-etch adhesive might be preferable for the restorative procedure.

scholarly journals Bond strength of a pit-and-fissure sealant associated to etch-and-rinse and self-etching adhesive systems to saliva-contaminated enamel: individual vs. simultaneous light curing

2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 341-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaciara Miranda Gomes-Silva ◽  
Carolina Paes Torres ◽  
Marta Maria Martins Giamatei Contente ◽  
Maria Angélica Hueb de Menezes Oliveira ◽  
Regina Guenka Palma-Dibb ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Bonding Agent ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Fissure Sealant ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Light Curing ◽  
Pit And Fissure Sealant

This study evaluated in vitro the shear bond strength (SBS) of a resin-based pit-and-fissure sealant [Fluroshield (F), Dentsply/Caulk] associated with either an etch-and-rinse [Adper Single Bond 2 (SB), 3M/ESPE] or a self-etching adhesive system [Clearfil S3 Bond (S3), Kuraray Co., Ltd.] to saliva-contaminated enamel, comparing two curing protocols: individual light curing of the adhesive system and the sealant or simultaneous curing of both materials. Mesial and distal enamel surfaces from 45 sound third molars were randomly assigned to 6 groups (n=15), according to the bonding technique: I - F was applied to 37% phosphoric acid etched enamel. The other groups were contaminated with fresh human saliva (0.01 mL; 10 s) after acid etching: II - SB and F were light cured separately; III - SB and F were light cured together; IV - S3 and F were light cured separately; V - S3 and F were light cured simultaneously; VI - F was applied to saliva-contaminated, acid-etched enamel without an intermediate bonding agent layer. SBS was tested to failure in a universal testing machine at 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Fisher's test (α=0.05).The debonded specimens were examined with a stereomicroscope to assess the failure modes. Three representative specimens from each group were observed under scanning electron microscopy for a qualitative analysis. Mean SBS in MPa were: I-12.28 (±4.29); II-8.57 (±3.19); III-7.97 (±2.16); IV-12.56 (±3.11); V-11.45 (±3.77); and VI-7.47 (±1.99). In conclusion, individual or simultaneous curing of the intermediate bonding agent layer and the resin sealant did not seem to affect bond strength to saliva-contaminated enamel. S3/F presented significantly higher SBS than the that of the groups treated with SB etch-and-rinse adhesive system and similar SBS to that of the control group, in which the sealant was applied under ideal dry, noncontaminated conditions.

scholarly journals Bond Durability of Adhesives Containing Modified-monomer With/Without-fluoride After Aging in Artificial Saliva and Under Intrapulpal Pressure Simulation

2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
HA El-Deeb ◽  
HH Al Sherbiney ◽  
EH Mobarak
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Artificial Saliva ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Single Step ◽  
The Other ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Self Etch ◽  
Bond Durability

SUMMARY Objective: To evaluate the dentin bond strength durability of adhesives containing modified-monomer with/without-fluoride after storage in artificial saliva and under intrapulpal pressure simulation (IPPS). Materials and Methods: The occlusal enamel of 48 freshly extracted teeth was trimmed to expose midcoronal dentin. Roots were sectioned to expose the pulp chamber and to connect the specimens to the pulpal-pressure assembly. Specimens were assigned into four groups (n=12) according to adhesive system utilized: a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system (SB, Adper Single Bond 2, 3M ESPE), a two-step self-etch adhesive system (CSE, Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray Medical Inc), and two single-step self-etch adhesives with the same modified monomer (bis-acrylamide)—one with fluoride (AOF, AdheSE One F, Ivoclar-Vivadent) and the other without (AO, AdheSE One, Ivoclar-Vivadent). Bonding was carried out while the specimens were subjected to 15-mm Hg IPPS. Resin composite (Valux Plus, 3M ESPE) buildups were made. After curing, specimens were aged in artificial saliva and under 20-mm Hg IPPS at 37°C in a specially constructed incubator either for 24 hours or six months prior to testing. Bonded specimens (n=6/group) were sectioned into sticks (n=24/group) with a cross section of 0.9 ± 0.01 mm2 and subjected to microtensile bond strength (μTBS) testing using a universal testing machine. Data were statistically analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures, one-way ANOVA tests, and a t-test (p&lt;0.05). Failure modes were determined using a scanning electron microscope. Results: The μTBS values of SB and CSE fell significantly after six-month storage in artificial saliva and under IPPS, yet these values remained significantly higher than those for the other two adhesives with modified monomers. There was no significant difference in the bond strength values between fluoride-containing and fluoride-free self-etch adhesive systems (AOF and AO) after 24 hours or six months. Modes of failure were mainly adhesive and mixed. Conclusions: Based on the results of this study, 1) Fluoride addition did not affect dentin bond durability; and 2) despite the fact that the single-step adhesive system with modified monomer showed stability, bond strengths associated with these systems remained lower than those of multistep adhesive systems.

scholarly journals Impact of radiotherapy on the bond strength of different adhesive systems to human dentin

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. e191638
Author(s):  
Renally Bezerra Wanderley Lima ◽  
Maria Luiza Pontual ◽  
Venâncio Fernandes Dantas ◽  
Sônia Saeger Meireles ◽  
Ana Karina Maciel Andrade ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Posterior Teeth ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Human Dentin

Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of radiotherapy on the bond strength of resin-based composite restorations to dentin, performed either 24 h or 1 year before or after radiation. Methods: Ninety-six posterior teeth were randomly distributed into the following groups: IB (n = 16), irradiated teeth were restored 1 year after x-ray application; NB (n = 16), not irradiated teeth were stored for 1 year and then restored. IA (n = 32), teeth were restored and irradiated at 24 h or 1 year after the restoration. NA (n = 32), teeth were restored, not irradiated, and tested as IA. Eight samples from each group were randomly assigned to either the three-step or two-step etch-and rinse adhesive system procedure. The irradiated specimens were subjected to 60 Gy of x-ray radiation fractionally. The restored teeth were vertically sectioned, and 1-mm2 resin–dentin sticks were obtained and submitted to the microtensile bond strength test. The bond strength data were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). Failure modes were examined by optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Results: The IB group showed lower bond strength values compared to the NB group. The bond strength values between the adhesive systems were not statistically different. Conclusion: The application of radiation dose decreased the bond strength of the adhesive restorations to dentin when the bonding procedure was conducted 1 year after in vitro radiotherapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document