Occluded Image Function: A Novel Measure for Evaluating Machine Learning Classifiers for Biometrics

Author(s):  
Adam Morrone ◽  
Wes Anderson ◽  
Steven J. Simske

A novel method is presented for evaluating the efficacy of object recognition algorithms on occluded images, called the occluded image function (OIF). The OIF describes system behavior in occluded environments and thus gives qualitative insight into their mechanisms; derivative metrics from OIF can also be used to quantitatively compare classifiers. To showcase the utility of the OIF, an experiment is performed by obstructing optical gait images from two biped robot models and using four binary machine learning classifiers to distinguish between them. The OIF diagrams are created from each experiment, and the resulting insights about the classifiers are discussed. Using the OIF, it is shown that the primitive classifiers can sometimes perform better under occlusion conditions, possibly due to pre-filtering of gait data by uniform occlusions. This result serves to demonstrate that the OIF is a useful tool for classifier evaluation.

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1433
Author(s):  
Shobitha Shetty ◽  
Prasun Kumar Gupta ◽  
Mariana Belgiu ◽  
S. K. Srivastav

Machine learning classifiers are being increasingly used nowadays for Land Use and Land Cover (LULC) mapping from remote sensing images. However, arriving at the right choice of classifier requires understanding the main factors influencing their performance. The present study investigated firstly the effect of training sampling design on the classification results obtained by Random Forest (RF) classifier and, secondly, it compared its performance with other machine learning classifiers for LULC mapping using multi-temporal satellite remote sensing data and the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform. We evaluated the impact of three sampling methods, namely Stratified Equal Random Sampling (SRS(Eq)), Stratified Proportional Random Sampling (SRS(Prop)), and Stratified Systematic Sampling (SSS) upon the classification results obtained by the RF trained LULC model. Our results showed that the SRS(Prop) method favors major classes while achieving good overall accuracy. The SRS(Eq) method provides good class-level accuracies, even for minority classes, whereas the SSS method performs well for areas with large intra-class variability. Toward evaluating the performance of machine learning classifiers, RF outperformed Classification and Regression Trees (CART), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Relevance Vector Machine (RVM) with a >95% confidence level. The performance of CART and SVM classifiers were found to be similar. RVM achieved good classification results with a limited number of training samples.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document