Evaluation of bond strength of dual resin cements to CAD/CAM-created lithium disilicate ceramic

2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Felipe Sczepanski ◽  
Cláudia R. Brunnquell ◽  
Sandrine B. Berger ◽  
Eloisa A. Paloco ◽  
Murilo B. Lopes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Lithium Disilicate ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Cad Cam

scholarly journals Effects of Immediate and Delayed Cementations for CAD/CAM Resin Block after Alumina Air Abrasion on Adhesion to Newly Developed Resin Cement

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (22) ◽  
pp. 7058
Author(s):  
Akane Chin ◽  
Masaomi Ikeda ◽  
Tomohiro Takagaki ◽  
Toru Nikaido ◽  
Alireza Sadr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Water Sorption ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Air Abrasion ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Computer Aided ◽  
Cad Cam ◽  
Curing Methods

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of one week of Computer-aided design/Computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) crown storage on the μTBS between resin cement and CAD/CAM resin composite blocks. The micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) test groups were divided into 4 conditions. There are two types of CAD/CAM resin composite blocks, namely A block and P block (KATANA Avencia Block and KATANA Avencia P Block, Kuraray Noritake Dental, Tokyo, Japan) and two types of resin cements. Additionally, there are two curing methods (light cure and chemical cure) prior to the μTBS test—Immediate: cementation was performed immediately; Delay: cementation was conducted after one week of storage in air under laboratory conditions. The effect of Immediate and Delayed cementations were evaluated by a μTBS test, surface roughness measurements, light intensity measurements, water sorption measurements and Scanning electron microscope/Energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (SEM/EDS) analysis. From the results of the μTBS test, we found that Delayed cementation showed significantly lower bond strength than that of Immediate cementation for both resin cements and both curing methods using A block. There was no significant difference between the two types of resin cements or two curing methods. Furthermore, water sorption of A block was significantly higher than that of P block. Within the limitations of this study, alumina air abrasion of CAD/CAM resin composite restorations should be performed immediately before bonding at the chairside to minimize the effect of humidity on bonding.

scholarly journals Post-etching cleaning influences the resin shear bond strength to CAD/CAM lithium-disilicate ceramics

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Greciana Bruzi ◽  
Adriana Oliveira Carvalho ◽  
Marcelo Giannini ◽  
Hamilton Pires Maia ◽  
Pascal Magne
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Lithium Disilicate ◽  
Cad Cam

scholarly journals Bond strength of modern self-adhesive resin cements to human dentin and different CAD/CAM ceramics

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrzej Małysa ◽  
Joanna Weżgowiec ◽  
Dariusz Danel ◽  
Klauss Boening ◽  
Katarzyna Walczak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Shear Strength Test ◽  
Software Failure ◽  
Human Dentin ◽  
Cad Cam ◽  
Bond Strengths

Purpose: The aim of the study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of CAD/CAM ceramics to dentin after cementation with conventional or self-adhesive resin cements. Methods: Three self-adhesive, self-etching cements (Panavia SA, RelyX U200, Maxcem Elite), and one conventional cement (Panavia V5), were selected to lute three CAD/CAM ceramics (IPS Empress CAD, IPS e.max CAD, IPS e.max ZirCAD) onto the dentin. The bond strength was evaluated using a shear strength test according to the PN-EN ISO 29022:2013-10. Evaluation of the differences was performed using the Statistica software. Failure modes were analyzed using a light microscope. Results: All the studied cements differed (regardless of the ceramic type) in the bond strength. The highest bond strength was observed in Panavia V5, lower – in RelyX U200 and Panavia SA, and the lowest – in Maxcem. For IPS e.max ZirCAD, it was observed that compared to Panavia V5, the other cements were characterized by a significantly higher bond strength. For the IPS Empress CAD and the IPS e.max CAD, Panavia V5 displayed the highest bond strength. For all the studied self-adhesive cements, the failure of adhesion between the cement and dentin was predominant mode. Conclusions: Significant differences were found in the shear bond strengths of the CAD/CAM ceramics luted to dentin using tested self-adhesive and conventional cements. The bond strength depended on the combination of ceramic and cement. The IPS e.max ZirCAD had the highest bond strength to dentin after cementation with RelyX U200, while the IPS Empress CAD and IPS e.max CAD – with Panavia V5.

scholarly journals Microshear Bond Strength of Resin Cements to Lithium Disilicate Substrates as a Function of Surface Preparation

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 524-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
DP Lise ◽  
J Perdigão ◽  
A Van Ende ◽  
O Zidan ◽  
GC Lopes
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Lithium Disilicate ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Relyx Unicem ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Microshear Bond Strength ◽  
Silane Solution

SUMMARY Objectives To investigate the effect of hydrofluoric acid (HF) etching, silane solution, and adhesive system application on the microshear bond strength (μSBS) of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (LD) to three resin cements. Materials and Methods Circular bonding areas were delimited on the lithium disilicate surfaces using a perforated adhesive tape. Specimens were assigned to 18 subgroups (n=12) according to surface treatment: NT = no treatment; HF = 4.8% HF for 20 seconds; silane solution: (1) no silane; (2) Monobond Plus, a silane/10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate solution for 60 seconds; (3) Monobond Plus+ExciTE F DSC, a dual-cure adhesive; and resin cement: (1) Variolink II, a bisphenol A diglycidyl ether dimethacrylate (bis-GMA)–based, hand-mixed, dual-cure resin cement; (2) Multilink Automix, a bis-GMA–based, auto-mixed, dual-cure resin cement; (3) RelyX Unicem 2, a self-adhesive, auto-mixed, dual-cure resin cement. Tygon tubes (Ø=0.8 mm) were used as cylinder matrices for resin cement application. After 24 hours of water storage, the specimens were submitted to the μSBS test. Mode of failure was evaluated under an optical microscope and classified as adhesive, mixed, cohesive in resin cement, or cohesive in ceramic. Data were statistically analyzed with three-way analysis of variance and Dunnett test (p<0.05). Results When means were pooled for the factor surface treatment, HF resulted in a significantly higher μSBS than did NT (p<0.0001). Regarding the use of a silane solution, the mean μSBS values obtained with Monobond Plus and Monobond Plus+ExciTE F DSC were not significantly different but were higher than those obtained with no silane (p<0.001). Considering the factor resin cement, Variolink II resulted in a significantly higher mean μSBS than did RelyX Unicem 2 (p<0.03). The mean μSBS for Multilink Automix was not significantly different from those of Variolink II and RelyX Unicem 2. According to Dunnett post hoc test (p<0.05), there was no significant difference in μSBS between the different resin cements for HF-etched and silanized (with or without adhesive application) LD surfaces. Conclusion LD may benefit from pretreatment of the inner surface with HF and silanization, regardless of the resin cement used.

Surface milled by CAD-CAM system Vs laboratorial methods to simulate the milled surface: Effect on the resin bond strength to lithium disilicate glass-ceramic

2021 ◽  
pp. 103068
Author(s):  
Rafaela Oliveira Pilecco ◽  
Kiara Serafini Dapieve ◽  
Gabriela Carrão Aragonez ◽  
Luís Felipe Guilardi ◽  
Guilherme Schmitt de Andrade ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Glass Ceramic ◽  
Surface Effect ◽  
Lithium Disilicate ◽  
Milled Surface ◽  
Cad Cam

Effect of Different Adhesive Strategies and Time on Microtensile Bond Strength of a CAD/CAM Composite to Dentin

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 262-272
Author(s):  
EM Meda ◽  
RN Rached ◽  
SA Ignácio ◽  
IA Fornazari ◽  
EM Souza
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Computer Aided Design ◽  
Optical Microscope ◽  
Single Bond ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Bonding Agents ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Computer Aided ◽  
Cad Cam

SUMMARY Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of adhesive strategy and time on the microtensile bond strength of a computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) composite to dentin. Methods and Materials: Sixty CAD/CAM composite blocks were bonded to human dentin with simplified bonding agents using etch-and-rinse and self-etching approaches and amine-based and amine-free resin cements, with and without the application of a dual-cure activator (DCA; n=10): SBP-ARC (Adper Single Bond Plus + RelyX ARC), SBP-RXU (Adper Single Bond Plus + RelyX Ultimate), SBP-DCA-RXU (Adper Single Bond Plus + DCA + RelyX Ultimate), SBU-ARC (Scotchbond Universal + RelyX ARC), SBU-RXU (Scotchbond Universal + RelyX Ultimate), and SBU-DCA-ARC (Scotchbond Universal + DCA + RelyX ARC). Each specimen was light cured for 40 seconds under load and stored in distilled water at 37°C for seven days. Stick-shaped specimens (1.0 mm2) were obtained. Half of the specimens underwent microtensile bond strength testing, and the other half were subjected to the same tests after six months of storage. Failure mode was determined using an optical microscope (40×). The data were analyzed by a two-way analysis of variance followed by the Games-Howell test and Student t-test (preset alpha of 0.05). Results: After seven days, SBU-RXU presented the highest mean bond strength, statistically different from only SBU-ARC (p<0.05). Most of the groups exhibited a statistically significant reduction in bond strength after 6 months (p<0.05), except SBP-RXU and SBU-ARC (p>0.05). Conclusion: The adhesive strategy, with different associations between adhesive systems and resin cements, as well as the use of a DCA, affected the bond strength of both amine-free and amine-based resin cements to a CAD/CAM composite.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document