scholarly journals Almost complete resolution of a lumbar disc herniation after lateral interbody fusion without posterior open decompression

2018 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver P. Gautschi ◽  
Martin N. Stienen ◽  
Marco V. Corniola ◽  
Granit Molliqaj ◽  
Enrico Tessitore
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Lou ◽  
Shijie Liu ◽  
Weiyang Yu ◽  
Feijun Liu ◽  
Zhenzhong Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: To investigate the preliminary clinical and radiographic outcomes of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) combined with percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) for the degenerative lumbar disease accompanied by prolapsed disc herniation.Methods: From March 2016 to December 2018, 15 patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, lumbar spine instability or lumbar spinal stenosis accompanied by prolapsed disc herniation were underwent OLIF combined with PTED in our spine surgery center, including 6 males and 9 females, the mean age was 61.4±7.1 years. Clinical results, radiological parameters, and related complications were collected and analyzed.Results: All patients firstly received PTED with local anesthesia and then underwent OLIF with general anesthesia. All patients were followed up for an average of 14.6±3.7 months. Mean preoperative visual analog scale scores and Oswestry Disability Index scores were significantly improved postoperatively (P<0.05). The radiographic results include the intervertebral disc height, vertical diameter of intervertebral foramen, spinal canal anteroposterior diameter, segment angle and lumbar lordosis angle were significantly improved postoperatively, respectively (P<0.05). None major implant-related and other severe complications were happened.Conclusions: OLIF combined with PTED can successfully enables direct neural decompression without posterior decompressive procedures and might be an alternative minimally invasive surgical option for properly selected patients.


Author(s):  
Hamza Sucuoğlu ◽  
Abdullah Yüksel Barut

Purpose: To assess radiological changes and clinical outcomes of patients with sequestered lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and evaluate the relationship between them. Methods: Patients diagnosed with sequestered LDH were followed-up in two groups: operated (within the first month after diagnosis) and nonoperated. Visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores at baseline (V1) and 1st (V2), 3rd (V3), 6th (V4) month visits were used for clinical evaluation. Radiological evaluation was performed by measuring the sequestered LDH level and herniation volume using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at V1 and V4. After the second MRI, patients in the nonoperated group were divided into three groups: nonregression (n=6), partial regression (n=22), and complete resolution (n=27); patients were analyzed in four groups including the ones in the operated (n=25) group. Results: Significant improvements were observed in VAS and ODI scores at V2 and V3 in all groups and at V4 in partial regression and complete resolution groups. VAS and ODI score improvements at V2 and V3 were significantly higher in the operated group than in other groups. At V4, no significant difference remained between the operated group and partial regression and complete resolution groups regarding VAS and ODI scores. Conclusions: Spontaneous regression was observed in the 6th month MRI in most of the nonoperated sequestered LDH patients with conservative treatment. Improvements in pain and disability scores were higher among the operated patients at the early stage, whereas they were found to have no difference with spontaneous regression patients at the 6th month.


2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 34-43
Author(s):  
M. N. Kravtsov ◽  
I. A. Kruglov ◽  
S. D. Mirzametov ◽  
A. S. Seleznev ◽  
N. P. Alekseyeva ◽  
...  

Objective. To compare the effectiveness of surgical methods for treating patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation.Material and Methods. The sample consisted of 160 patients operated on in 2014–2019 for recurrent lumbar disc herniation by percutaneous endoscopic discectomy (Group 1), microsurgical discectomy (Group 2), single-level transforaminal interbody fusion (Group 3) and single-level total intervertebral disc replacement (Group 4). The effectiveness of surgical treatment was evaluated using the NRS-11, ODI, and MacNab questionnaires.Results. Assessment of the pain syndrome severity and the vital activity level of patients revealed significant (p < 0.05) differences in favor of total intervertebral disc replacement. Excellent and good outcomes after arthroplasty according to MacNab criteria were noted in all patients in this group. Similar outcomes were reported in 77.5 % (31/40) of patients in the TLIF group, in 75.1 % (24/32) of patients in the percutaneous endoscopic discectomy group and in 72.6 % (45/62) of patients in the microdiscectomy group. The operation time and length of hospital stay were shorter in the endoscopic and microsurgical discectomy groups (p < 0.001). However, the lower incidence of complications and reoperations was observed in groups of posterior interbody fusion and arthroplasty (p > 0.05).Conclusion. Arthroplasty with the M6-L implant expands the possibilities of surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Total intervertebral disc replacement and posterior interbody fusion for recurrent lumbar disc herniation are more effective in comparison with decompressive operations, which is reflected in the improvement of clinical treatment outcomes, reduction of perioperative complications and frequency of repeated interventions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document