Finite-time Controllers for a Class of Planar Nonlinear Systems with Mismatched Disturbances**This work was supported by U.S. National Science Foundation (Grant No. 1826086), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61973178, 61973139, Key Program:u2066203), The Key Project of Philosophy and Social Science Research in Colleges and Universities in Jiangsu Province (Grant No. 2020SJZDA098), Key University Science Research Project of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. 17KJA120003)

Author(s):  
Kecai Cao ◽  
Chunjiang Qian
1998 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 415-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
DESMOND KING

In the twenty years after 1945 both the United States and Britain created public funding regimes for social science, through the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Social Science Research Council (SSRC) respectively. The historical and political contexts in which these institutions were founded differed, but the assumptions about social science concurred. This article uses archival sources to explain this comparative pattern. It is argued that the political context in both countries played a key role in the development of the two research agencies. In each country the need politically to stress the neutrality of social research – though for different reasons in each case – produced a bias towards positivist scientific methodology, untempered by ideology. This propensity created the trajectory upon which each country's public funding regime rests.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document