scholarly journals Analysis of Propylene Glycol Raw Supplier Selection using the Analytic Hierarchy Process Method

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-73
Author(s):  
Yusuf Budiono ◽  
Dudi Permana
Keyword(s):  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Supplier Selection ◽  
Raw Material ◽  
Ahp Method ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Priority Order ◽  
The Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy Process Method ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Process Method

The purpose of this research is to study the priority order of the criteria and sub-criteria that influence supplier selection and to find out which supplier or supplier of the best raw material, which best meets the criteria for selecting the supplier that should be selected. In this study only limited to 4 criteria, namely price, quality, warranty, and delivery. This research is a qualitative research using the calculation method used is the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. The software used in using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method is version 3.2 super decisions. The findings show that the price criterion is the most important priority for companies to pay attention to, followed by delivery, quality, and warranty criteria.

scholarly journals Assessment of Factors Causing Bias in Marketing- Related Publications

Publications ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 45
Author(s):  
Mangirdas Morkunas ◽  
Elzė Rudienė ◽  
Lukas Giriūnas ◽  
Laura Daučiūnienė
Keyword(s):  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Scientific Publishing ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Expert Survey ◽  
The Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Publishing Community ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy Process Method ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Process Method

The present paper aims at revealing and ranking the factors that most frequently cause bias in marketing-related publications. In order to rank the factors causing bias, the authors employed the Analytic Hierarchy Process method with three different scales representing all scale groups. The data for the study were obtained through expert survey, which involved nine experts both from the academia and scientific publishing community. The findings of the study confirm that factors that most frequently cause bias in marketing related publications are sampling and sample frame errors, failure to specify the inclusion and exclusion criteria for researched subjects and non-responsiveness.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document