“INCOMPLETE” COURT PROCEDURES IN MODERN CIVIL PROCEDURE

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 27-49
Author(s):  
T.V. SAKHNOVA
Keyword(s):  
General Pattern ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Early 20Th Century ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Legal Space ◽  
Judicial Procedures ◽  
Litmus Test ◽  
Judicial Protection ◽  
Justice Of The Peace ◽  
General Vector

The development of judicial procedures is an indicator of increasing complexity of civil procedure, a clear manifestation of the general pattern – unification and differentiation of civil procedural form. And one of the main tasks of the legislator is to make sure that the objective complexity of the legal space does not lead to complication of the access to judicial protection for interested persons. This thesis, put forward by the author, acts as one of the key ideas of this study and is disclosed in the article in terms of “incomplete” judicial procedures. The “incomplete” judicial procedures, according to the author’s conception, include simplified proceedings, absentee proceeding, court-ordered proceedings and proceedings on insignificant claims. The latter should be understood as proceedings before a justice of the peace in action cases (see clauses 2–5 part 1 of Article 23 of the Civil Procedure Code of the RF). In conclusion it is concluded that the procedural nature of the Russian process, laid down in the codes of the early 20th century, now acquires conceptual importance, which requires a different methodology to solve current legislative problems. The procedures we have considered is a “litmus test” of the methods of justice, which allows us to comprehend the general vector of the further path of civilizational process reform.

scholarly journals To the admissibility of the civil law exemption of property from arrest, imposed in the criminal proceedings: domestic and foreign experience

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 190-200
Author(s):  
Natalia Kashtanova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Judicial Protection

The subject of paper deals with the legal nature of measures of criminal procedural compulsionin the form of seizure of property.Methodological basis of the article is based on general scientific dialectical methods of cognitionof objective reality of the legal processes and phenomena that allowed us to conduct anobjective assessment of the state of legislation and law enforcement practice in the proceduralaspects of the cancellation of the seizure of property in criminal proceedings of Russia.The results and scope of it’s application. It is submitted that the cancellation of the seizureof the property (or the individual limit) is allowed only on the grounds and in the mannerprescribed by the criminal procedure law of the Russian Federation. However, the studyfound serious contradictions in the application of the relevant law. In particular, cases inwhich the question of exemption of property from arrest (exclusion from the inventory),imposed in the criminal case was resolved in a civil procedure that, in the opinion of theauthor of the publication, is extremely unacceptable.On the stated issues topics analyzes opinions of scientists who say that the dispute aboutthe release of impounded property may be allowed in civil proceedings, including pendingresolution of the criminal case on the merits. The author strongly disagrees with this positionand supports those experts who argue that the filing of a claim for exemption of propertyfrom arrest (exclusion from the inventory) the reviewed judicial act of imposing of arrestwithout recognition per se invalid. In this regard, the author cites the legal position ofthe constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, from which clearly follows that of theright of everyone to judicial protection does not imply the possibility of choice of the citizenat its discretion, techniques and procedures of judicial protection, since the features of suchjudicial protection is defined in specific Federal laws.The author analyzes and appreciates Kazakhstan's experience of legal regulation of the permissibilityof filing a civil claim for exemption of property from seizure imposed in criminalproceedings. The author notes that the new civil procedural legislation of the Republic ofKazakhstan, which came into force from 01 January 2016, clearly captures that considerationin the civil proceedings are not subject to claims for exemption of property from seizureby the criminal prosecution body.Conclusions. Necessity of amendment to article 422 of the Civil Procedure Code of Russia:this article should not apply to cases of application of measures of criminal procedural compulsionin the form of seizure of property. Among other things, the author proposed additionsto part 9 of article 115 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Russia.

ON EVIDENCE AND PROOF IN CIVIL PROCEDURE (IN MEMORY OF PROFESSOR M.K. TREUSHNIKOV)

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 34-48
Author(s):  
T.V. SAKHNOVA
Keyword(s):  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Forensic Evidence ◽  
Basic Principles ◽  
The Core ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Litmus Test ◽  
Evidence And Proof ◽  
The 19Th Century

Proof and evidence reflect the quintessence of civil procedure; this is the “litmus test”, which inevitably and clearly shows the effectiveness (or ineffectiveness) of basic principles, efficiency (or ineffectiveness) of the legislative paradigm of civil procedure, predictive function of science. It is no coincidence that the problems of proof and evidence-including in their traditional hypostasis-have always been the focus of attention of prominent domestic proceduralists, beginning in the 19th century. A pleiad of Russian pre-revolutionary scholars who turned their eyes to forensic evidence – E.V. Vaskovskii, A.Kh. Golmsten, K.I. Malyshev, E.A. Nefediev, B.V. Popov, – which is continued in the 20th century by S.N. Abramov, A.F. Kleinman, S.V. Kurylev, P.P. Gureev, L.P. Smyshliaev, Ia.L. Shtutin, and K.S. Iudelson (we do not aim to name all names) is brilliant. And not coincidentally, we believe, the problems of judicial proof and judicial evidence became the core of scientific research and achievements of Professor M.K. Treushnikov, who continued the best traditions of domestic jurisprudence and formulated the basis of the modern evidential paradigm in civil proceedings, which was legislatively reflected in the 2002 Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation.

BASIC GUARANTEES FOR THE PROTECTION OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS BY MEANS OF CIVIL PROCEEDINGS

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Мадина Алиевна Умарова
Keyword(s):  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Fundamental Rights ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
Civil Cases ◽  
Fundamental Rights And Freedoms ◽  
The Right ◽  
Judicial Protection

Право на судебную защиту закреплено в нормах процессуального законодательства в отношении правосудия по гражданским делам. Судебное разрешение гражданско-правовых споров регулируется нормами Гражданского процессуального кодекса. В данной статье анализируется содержание института защиты основных прав и свобод посредством гражданского судопроизводства. The right to judicial protection is enshrined in the norms of the procedural legislation in relation to justice in civil cases. Judicial resolution of civil disputes is regulated by the norms of the Civil Procedure Code. This article analyzes the content of the Institute for the Protection of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms through civil proceedings.

Commentary to the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (continuation)

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-111
Author(s):  
M.R. Zagidullin ◽  
◽  
I.V. IReshetnikova ◽  
R.B. Sitdikov ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Russian Federation

La ideología tras el proyecto de Código Procesal Civil chileno

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (116) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Claudio Palavecino Cáceres
Keyword(s):  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Epistemic Function

In this essay I argue that the draft of the new Chilean Civil Procedure Code obeys a procedural publicist ideology. In keeping with it, the project assigns an epistemic function to the process; confers autonomous probative power to the judge; and weakens the principle of procedural legality. All of which shows an incongruity with the constitutional values that have prevailed in Chile until now.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document