scholarly journals Evaluation of abatacept for GVHD prophylaxis in patients with non-malignant diseases after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 22-29
Author(s):  
S. A. Radygina ◽  
A. P. Vasilieva ◽  
S. N. Kozlovskaya ◽  
I. P. Shipitsyna ◽  
A. M. Livshits ◽  
...  

Graft-versus-host diseases (GVHD) is one of most significant complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells transplantation (HSCT). T-cell activation is a major stage in the GVHD pathogenesis. T-cells require 2 signals for activation: cognate antigen/MHC binding T-cell receptors and positive costimulatory signals from antigen-presenting cells (APC). The predominant positive costimulatory signal to human CD4 T0-cells comes through the CD28 receptor. This signal can be blocked by fusion proteins (such as CTLA4-Ig). Abatacept is a soluble fusion protein, which links the extracellular domain of human CTLA-4 to the modified Fc portion of human IgG1. We present results of single-center prospective randomized study to evaluate the efficacy of adding abatacept to the GVHD prophylaxis protocol after hemopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with non-malignant diseases. Study was approved by Ethics Committee and Scientific Council of the Institute (protocol # 9/2013 from 01.10.2013). During 4 years we included 62 patients, 30 of them received abatacept as additional agent. Cumulative incidence of acute GVHD was significantly lower in this group in compare with control group (p = 0,018). When we stratified patients in dependents of graft processing technology, we did not see any advantages of abatacept in patients after transplantation with TCRαβ+/СD19+ graft depletion. However, after HSCT with non-manipulated graft the abatacept showed significant efficacy in aGVHD prophylaxis compared with control group (p = 0,024). Abatacept can be recommended as effective additional agent for GVHD prophylaxis after allogeneic HSCT in patients with non-malignant diseases.

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4470-4470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideki Sano ◽  
Shogo Kobayashi ◽  
Mitsuko Akaihata ◽  
Masaki Ito ◽  
Atsushi Kikuta

Abstract Abstract 4470 Background: Despite intensive multi-modal therapies, prognosis of refractory or relapsed pediatric solid tumor is dismal because majority of those tumors already get acquired chemo-resistance. Therefore new break through approaches are expected in order to improve their survival. The efficacy of allogeneic hematopoietic stem celltransplantation(SCT) is primarily attributed to a T/NK- cell-mediated response to HLA disparity between donor and tumor cell. Non–T-cell depleted (non TCD) haploidentical hematopoietc stem cell transplantation as immunothrapy is attractive challenge for refractory tumor, however, there are several reports describing graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effects in patients with solid tumors. The major problems of non-TCD haplo-SCT are lethal graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), graft failure (GF) and high-risk of early death. Previously we reported the safety profile from the retrospective study assessing GVHD prophylaxis that was conducted with anti-human thymocyte immunoglobulin (ATG), tacrolimus, methotrexate and prednisolone in non-TCD haplo-SCT (Mochizuki, Kikuta, Clin Transplant,2010 DOI:10.1111/j.1399-0012.2010.01352.x). We started clinical study of non-TCD HLA haploidentical hematopoietc stem cell transplantation for refractory or relapsed pediatric solid tumor as cell-mediated immune therapy since July, 2007. Objectives/Methods: This study presents a series of transplant experiments aiming to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of non-TCD HLA haploidentical hematopoietc stem cell transplantation for refractory or relapsed pediatric solid tumor. Seven cases (3males, 4females) with refractory or relapsed pediatric solid tumor were enrolled on this study between July 2007 to December 2010. One patient had second transplantation due to tumor progression 1year after transplantation. Among 7 patients, there are 3 cases of relapsed neuroblastoma, 1 case of relapsed Mesenchymal Chondrosarcoma, 1 case of relapsed Ewing sarcoma family tumor, 1 case of refractory alveolar soft part sarcoma with multiple lung metastasis, and 1 case of refractory primitive neuroectodermal tumor. Conditioning regimens consisted with fludarabine30mg/m2 at day-9 to -5+Melphalan70mg/m2 at day-4 to-3+rabbit ATG 1. 25mg/kg at day-2 to -1. The GVHD prophylaxis was conducted with tacrolimus (0.03mg/kg/day, start on day-1), methotrexate (10mg/m2, 7mg/m2, 7mg/m2 on day+1, +3, +6) and predonisolone (1mg/kg/day, day 0–29, taper on day30 without GVHD). HLA disparities were 3/8 in 3, 4/8 in 5. Donors included father(1), mothers(5), siblings(1), mother’s younger brother(1). Four pts received peripheral blood stem cells and 4 pts received bone marrow. Result: All of seven patients achieved primary engraftment but secondary graft rejection was observed in one patients. Median follow up period after transplantation were 14 months (range 11–40 months). Incidence of acute GvHD was 3/7 cases (grade±:1, gradeII:1, grade III:1), chronic GvHD was observed in 5(83%) of 6 evaluable patients. Three cases were underwent DLI for tumor progression. Treatment-related mortality(TRM) was not observed and reactivation of VZV, interstitial pneumonia, and HHV6 related limbic system encephalitis were recognized as major complication within 100 days after transplantation. Five cases of patients had tumor progression after transplantation, and two children were dead by tumor progression, other 3 cases had additional treatment. Two cases are alive and well, with no evidence of disease 13 and 14 months after transplantation. Graft versus Tumor effect was clearly observed in three cases. Conclusion: The survival rate of relapsed or refractory pediatric solid tumor is under 20%, however, the two-year probability of overall survival was 71.4% with no TRM in this study. These results indicated the feasibility and the possibility of efficacy of non-TCD HLA haploidentical hematopoietc stem cell transplantation for relapsed or refractory pediatric solid tumor. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 5052-5052
Author(s):  
Robert M. Dean ◽  
Kyle M. Donley ◽  
Juan Gea-Banacloche ◽  
Seth M. Steinberg ◽  
Jeanne Odom ◽  
...  

Abstract Engraftment syndrome (ES), defined as noninfectious fever, rash, and noncardiogenic pulmonary edema occurring at the time of hematopoietic recovery after stem cell transplantation, may cause significant morbidity in the peri-transplant period. However, its association with GVHD is unclear, and it remains controversial whether T-cell alloreactivity, nonspecific neutrophil activation, or other factors contribute to the pathogenesis of this syndrome. To study this question, we retrospectively analyzed patients enrolled in 3 separate protocols of reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (RIST). Group A included patients with relapsed/refractory hematologic malignancies undergoing RIST with T-cell replete allografts and cyclosporine for GVHD prophylaxis (n=49). Group B consisted of patients with hematologic malignancies receiving T-cell replete allografts and cyclosporine/methotrexate for GVHD prophylaxis (n=20). Group C included patients with metastatic breast cancer undergoing RIST with T-cell depleted allografts (1 x 105 CD3+ cells/kg) and cyclosporine for GVHD prophylaxis (n=17). All patients received an identical reduced-intensity conditioning regimen with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide, followed by infusion of filgrastim-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells and post-transplantation filgrastim until neutrophil recovery. The incidences of ES and acute GVHD varied according to treatment group (ES: chi-squared test, p=0.066; acute GVHD: chi-squared test, p=NS): Incidence of Engraftment Syndrome and Acute GVHD by Treatment Group Group Graft Composition GVHD Prophylaxis Engraftment Syndrome Acute GVHD, Grades 2–4 A T-cell replete Cyclosporine 24/49 (49%) 32/49 (65%) B T-cell replete Cyclosporine/Methotrexate 5/20 (25%) 9/20 (45%) C T-cell depleted Cyclosporine 4/17 (24%) 8/17 (47%) Logistic regression analysis identified hypoxemia requiring oxygen (OR 38.46, 95% CI 6.51 to 227.1; p=0.002), fever greater than 37 degrees C (OR 6.97, 95% CI 2.47 to 19.7; p<0.0001), and the maximum neutrophil count after engraftment (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.125; p=0.0093) as factors strongly associated with steroid administration for ES. Subjects with acute GVHD displayed a modest trend toward increased frequency of ES (exact Cochran-Armitage trend test, p=0.103). The association of the intensity of GVHD prophylaxis and the maximum neutrophil count with the incidence of ES implies that both alloreactive T cells and donor granulocytes may play a role in the development of this complication after RIST. These results suggest that additional studies are warranted to explore the contribution of alloreactivity to the pathogenesis, prevention, and treatment of ES.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document