scholarly journals KEPLER – NEWTON – LEIBNIZ – HEGEL

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 221-223
Author(s):  
Abdul Malek
Keyword(s):  
Planetary Motion ◽  
Newtonian Physics ◽  
Copernican Revolution ◽  
Modern Natural ◽  
Modern Natural Science ◽  
Kepler's Laws ◽  
Celestial Bodies ◽  
The Absolute ◽  
Positive Knowledge ◽  
Kepler’S Laws

Kepler’s Laws of planetary motion (following the Copernican revolution in cosmology), according to Leibniz and his follower Hegel, for the first-time in history discovered the keys to what Hegel called the absolute mechanics mediated by dialectical laws, which drives the celestial bodies, in opposition to finite mechanics in terrestrial Nature developed by mathematical and empirical sciences, but that are of very limited scope. Newton wrongly extended and imposed finite mechanics on the absolute mechanics of the cosmic bodies in the form of his Law of one-sided Universal Gravitational Attraction, by distorting and misrepresenting Kepler’s profound laws and in opposition to Leibniz’s more appropriate “Radial Planetary Orbital Equation”. The still-prevailing error by Newton (notwithstanding his well known manipulation of science for selfish ends), not only shows the limitation of mathematical idealism and prejudice driven modern cosmology in the form of Einstein’s theories of relativity; but also, have made gaining positive knowledge of the cosmos an impossibility and has impaired social/historical development of humanity by reinforcing decadent ruling ideas. Hegel’s Naturphilosophie is not only a protest against the misrepresentation of Kepler’s Laws in particular; his Enzyklopädie der Philosophischem Wissenschaften is the negation and the direct rebuttal of Newtonian physics and Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica, in general. Modern natural science ignores Leibniz and Hegel at its own peril! Kepler’s phenomenological laws of planetary motion and the dialectical insights of Leibnitz and Hegel opens the way for gaining positive knowledge of the dynamics, structure and the evolution of the cosmic bodies and other cosmic phenomena; without invoking mysteries and dark/black cosmic entities, which has been the pabulum of official astrophysics and cosmology so far.

scholarly journals Kepler, Newton and numerical analysis

Acta Numerica ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 561-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Wanner
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Analysis ◽  
Numerical Methods ◽  
Differential Equations ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Modern Science ◽  
Planetary Motion ◽  
Kepler's Laws ◽  
Mathematical Problems ◽  
Kepler’S Laws

Numerical methods are usually constructed for solving mathematical problems such as differential equations or optimization problems. In this contribution we discuss the fact that numerical methods, applied inversely, were also important inestablishingthese models. We show in detail the discovery of the laws of planetary motion by Kepler and Newton, which stood at the beginning of modern science. The 400th anniversary of the publication of Kepler's laws (1609) is a good occasion for this investigation.

Equations Governing Kepler’s Laws of planetary motion

Resonance ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 1166-1170
Author(s):  
Renuka Ravindran
Keyword(s):  
Planetary Motion ◽  
Kepler's Laws ◽  
Kepler’S Laws

Kepler's Laws of Planetary Motion: 1609–1666

1964 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. L. Russell
Keyword(s):  
Theoretical Basis ◽  
Western Europe ◽  
Strong Support ◽  
Planetary Motion ◽  
Exact Form ◽  
The Third ◽  
Kepler's Laws ◽  
Third Law ◽  
Century Science ◽  
Kepler’S Laws

SynopsisHistorians of seventeenth-century science have frequently asserted that Kepler's laws of planetary motion were largely ignored between the time of their first publication (1609, 1619) and the publication of Newton's Principia (1687). In fact, however, they were more widely known and accepted than has been generally recognized.Kepler's ideas were, indeed, rather slow in establishing themselves, and until about 1630 there are few references to them in the literature of the time. But from then onwards, interest in them increased fairly rapidly. In particular, the principle of elliptical orbits had been accepted by most of the leading astronomers in France before 1645 and in England by about 1655. It also received quite strong support in Holland.The second law had a more chequered history. It was enunciated in its exact form by a few writers and was used in practice by some others without being explicitly formulated, but the majority, especially after 1645, preferred one or another of several variant forms which were easier to use but only approximately correct. The third law attracted less interest than the others, chiefly perhaps because it had no satisfactory theoretical basis, but it was correctly stated by at least six writers during the period under review.Between about 1630 and 1650 Kepler's Epitome Astronomiae Copernicanae (in which all three laws were clearly formulated) was probably the most widely read work on theoretical astronomy in northern and western Europe, while his Rudolphine Tables, which were based upon the first two laws, were regarded by the majority of astronomers as the most accurate planetary tables available.Kepler's work certainly did not receive all the recognition it deserved, but the extent to which it was neglected has been much exaggerated.

scholarly journals General Keplerian Dynamics (GKD): A Testable Grand Unified Theory

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 16-27
Author(s):  
Brent Lee Jarvis
Keyword(s):  
Unified Model ◽  
Planetary Motion ◽  
Unified Theory ◽  
Grand Unified Theory ◽  
Universal Gravitation ◽  
Kepler's Laws ◽  
Kepler’S Laws

Newton Generalized Kepler's Laws of Planetary Motion when he Developed his Laws of Universal Gravitation. Additional Generalizations are Submitted and an Auspicious Unified Model that can Be Tested Experimentally is Disclosed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document