scholarly journals Tiller recruitment patterns and biennial tiller production in prairie sandreed.

2006 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
J.R. Hendrickson ◽  
L.E. Moser ◽  
P.E. Reece
2000 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 537 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. R. Hendrickson ◽  
L. E. Moser ◽  
P. E. Reece

Brain ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 132 (3) ◽  
pp. 684-694 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Caeyenberghs ◽  
N. Wenderoth ◽  
B. C. M. Smits-Engelsman ◽  
S. Sunaert ◽  
S. P. Swinnen

Science ◽  
1977 ◽  
Vol 196 (4287) ◽  
pp. 324-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Tegner ◽  
P. Dayton

Ecoscience ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin Lönnberg ◽  
Ove Eriksson

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Lewis

One of the standard generalizations about new religions is that people convert to NRMs primarily through preexisting social networks. The present paper examines data on a variety of new religions which demonstrates that social networks are not always the dominant point of contact for new converts. Additionally, recruitment patterns change over time so that different factors become dominant at different points in a movement’s development. Two reasons why this variability has escaped the attention of most researchers is an unconscious tendency to assume that the sociological profiles of members of different NRMs are essentially similar, and the fact that such groups are typically studied synchronically rather than diachronically.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document