Concomitant His bundle pacing and atrioventricular junction ablation

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Coluccia ◽  
Michele Accogli ◽  
Alessandro Guido ◽  
Marco Valerio Chiarillo ◽  
Vincenzo Panico ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 242-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
NITIN KULKARNI ◽  
CURTISS MOORE ◽  
AMBARISH PANDEY ◽  
DEMETRIO CASTILLO ◽  
COLBY AYERS ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Parikshit S. Sharma ◽  
Henry D. Huang ◽  
Richard G. Trohman ◽  
Angela Naperkowski ◽  
Kenneth A. Ellenbogen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-133
Author(s):  
James E. Ip ◽  
Steven M. Markowitz

EP Europace ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii3-ii9
Author(s):  
Wei Hua ◽  
Shu Zhang ◽  
Dejia Huang

Author(s):  
Giovanni Coluccia ◽  
Michele Accogli ◽  
Pietro Palmisano
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-234
Author(s):  
C. Chaumont ◽  
N. Auquier ◽  
A. Milhem ◽  
A. Mirolo ◽  
A. Al Arnaout ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Ciesielski ◽  
A Slawuta ◽  
A Zabek ◽  
K Boczar ◽  
B Malecka ◽  
...  

Abstract   A single-chamber ICD is a standard method for primary SCD prophylaxis. In patients with chronic atrial fibrillation it does not contribute to the regularization of heart rate, which is crucial for proper treatment. Moreover, to avoid the deleterious effect of right ventricular pacing only minority of the patients with single chamber ICD get the appropriate, recommended dose of beta-blockers. The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy of direct His-bundle pacing in a population of patients with congestive heart failure and chronic atrial fibrillation using upgrade from single chamber to dual-chamber ICD and atrial channel to perform the His-bundle pacing Methods The study population included 39 patients (37 men, 2 women) aged 67.2±9.3 years, with CHF and chronic AF implanted primarily with single chamber ICD with established pharmacotherapy and stable clinical status. Results The echocardiography measurements at baseline and during follow-up were presented in the table: During short period (3–6 months) of follow-up the mean values of EF and LV dimensions significantly improved. This was also accompanied by functional status improvement. Conclusions His-bundle-based pacing in CHF-chronic AF patients contributes to significant echocardiographic and clinical improvement. Standard single-chamber ICD implantation in CHF-chronic AF patients yields only SCD prevention without influence on remodeling process. The physiological pacing contributes to better pharmacotherapy. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
F Zanon ◽  
L Marcantoni ◽  
G Pastore ◽  
E Baracca ◽  
C Picariello ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction His bundle pacing (HBP) allows physiological ventricular activation and prevents the electrical and mechanical desynchronization generally induced by myocardial stimulation, which can increase the risk of atrial fibrillation and heart failure. On the other hand, reliable HBP capture often requires higher energy than conventional myocardial pacing. This reduces the expected life of the stimulator and might limit the diffusion of HBP in the clinical practice. Purpose Decreasing HBP current drain by careful management of stimulation safety margin and pulse duration. Methods In 28 patients undergoing DDD pacing with HBP, a third lead was implanted in RV apex to provide back-up pacing on demand. HBP and apical leads were connected, respectively, to the V1 and V2 channels of a 3-chamber stimulator. When HBP was effective, apical sensing occurred within the VV delay and prevented V2 stimulation. In contrast, in case of HBP failure, V2 sensing was missing and apical back-up pacing was promptly delivered at the end of the VV delay. The availability of a back-up pulse on demand allowed reducing the HBP safety margin with no risk. Furthermore, the individual HBP strength-duration curve was derived in the aim of optimizing the Hisian pulse parameters, which are the major determinants of the device current drain. Results Correct back-up inhibition by successful HBP and stimulation in the event of capture loss was achieved in all the patients. The latency from Hisian pacing to apical sensing averaged 96±14 ms. According to the pacemaker counters, no back-up pulse was delivered in daily life in 59% of patients. In the remaining, the prevalence of back-up stimulation never exceeded 15% of paced ventricular cycles. The high HBP threshold was essentially due to an increased rheobase (1.2±0.6 V), while the chronaxie ranged from 0.30 to 0.53 ms in 71% of patients (median 0.44 ms), exceeding 0.6 ms only in 29% of the cases. An average current saving of 5.4±3.0 μA was obtained at the expense of a mild reduction in HBP safety margin (from 1.6±0.2 to 1.4±0.1 times). HBP and apical back-up Conclusions Back-up stimulation on demand is a reliable option to decrease HBP current drain and prolong the stimulator service life with full safety. In most of the cases, significant saving can be achieved by pulse shortening, as the chronaxie time is in the same range as with myocardial stimulation and longer pulses are not required. A pulse duration exceeding 0.6 ms is indicated in less than 1/3 of the implants.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document