Sovereign Wealth Funds in the Global Capital Markets: Reintermediation and New Collaborative Models

2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 18-26
Author(s):  
Scott E. Kalb
2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 63-86
Author(s):  
Bliss Burdett Pak

This paper examines the new policy issues surrounding the rise of the “sovereign wealth funds” in global capital markets. A profound and newly significant incidence of globalization, the role of foreign governments as capital providers in nominally capitalistic, free-market economies is disrupting basic principals and assumptions regarding the role of private and public markets and their regulators. This paper examines the potential for appropriate regulatory schemes co channel these wealth pools in economically productive and apolitically-motivated directions, with the goal of permitting them to perform the functions for which they were established: the preservation and prudential investment of the vase wealth of nations. This regulatory analysis proceeds along three lines: (i) first, a model for corporate governance of a "typical" sovereign fund is proposed, based on the established models of private sector investment fund schemes; (ii) second, a review of host state models and current proposals for foreign investment regulation is undertaken, focusing on the special scrutiny given or proposed co be made available for investments by state-owned funds; and (iii) finally, an assessment is offered regarding international organizations' potential role as venues for cooperation and coordination of the newest and largest players in global capital markets. Though the sovereign wealth funds have made significant gains in establishing their credibility as welcome and responsible providers of global capital through their voluntary and independent actions, this paper concludes chat both state-level regulatory accommodation and international cooperation through established economic organizations such as the OECD and IMF offer significant potential benefits to both the funds and the national markets (and target companies therein) if appropriately designed. At a minimum, national and international treatment of the special nature of the sovereign wealth funds may enable capital markets to remain relatively open by specifically addressing the sources of market participants’ (and politicians’) fears of abuse, thereby strengthening the structures chat support the global free movement of capital and channel it co its highest and best use.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-76
Author(s):  
Sinsu Anna Mathew ◽  
Abdul Quadir Md

This article describes the “Blockchain” which is an upcoming technology in the current leading world and which serves as a capital market use-cases for many of the global Fintech industries across the world, is a distributed ledger of economic transactions which not only used for recording financial transactions but mostly everything of value in this world. In the current world, mostly all the transactions are done through online which mainly includes the bank as a “middle man,” which could be untrustworthy at times. Blockchain comes into the picture which eliminates the need of a middle man or third party between the users who are involved in the transactions. Represents a financial ledger entry of data structure which consists of record of transactions which is digitally signed and cannot be tampered as authenticity is ensured in which the ledger is considered to be of high integrity. One of the leading and highly valued platform of blockchain is “Hyperledger Fabric” which is meant for securing transactions and serves a powerful container technology for smart contract development in the global capital firms. The potential of Blockchain and DLT in capital markets in this upcoming world could remove many of the inefficiencies and costs inherent in the global capital markets across the world and could be considered as a viable technology which enable to settlement.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Avdjiev ◽  
Wenxin Du ◽  
Cathérine Koch ◽  
Hyun Song Shin

We document a triangular relationship in that a stronger dollar goes hand in hand with larger deviations from covered interest parity (CIP) and contractions of cross-border bank lending in dollars. We argue that underpinning the triangle is the role of the dollar as a key barometer of risk-taking capacity in global capital markets. (JEL F23, F31, G15, G21)


2004 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 349-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew H. Chen ◽  
Thomas F. Siems

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document