scholarly journals Reliability Engineering. Suitable Sample Area and Number of Division in Estimation of Maximum Crack Length by Extreme Value Analysis, III. Estimation Accuracy of Maximum Crack Length by Extreme Value Analysis. Factor of Difference in Estimation Accuracy between Theoretical Analysis and Monte Carlo Simulation.

1998 ◽  
Vol 47 (12) ◽  
pp. 1227-1232
Author(s):  
Takashi MATSUMURA ◽  
Masahiro ICHIKAWA
2008 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 96-103
Author(s):  
S. Chandrasekhar

Motor Vehicle Insurance claims form a substantial component of Non life insurance claims and it is also growing with increasing number of vehicles on roads. It is also desirable to have an idea of what will be the likely claim amount for the coming future (Monthly, Quarterly, Yearly) based on past claim data. If one looks at the claim amount one can make out that there will be few large claims compared to large number of average and below average claims. Thus the distributions of claims do not follow a Symmetric pattern which makes it difficult using normal Statistical analysis. The methodology followed to analyze such data is known as Extreme value Analysis. Extreme value analysis is a general name which covers (i) Generalised Extreme Value (GEV) (ii) Generalised Pareto Distribution (GPD). Basically these techniques can deal with non symmetric shape of the distribution which is close to reality. Normally one fits a generalised Extreme Value distribution (GEV)/Generalised Pareto Distribution (GPD) and using parameters of fitted distribution future, forecast of likely losses can be predicted. Second method of analyzing such data is using methodology of simulation. Here we fit a Poisson distribution for arrival of claims and weibull/pareto/Lognormal for claim amount. Using Monte Carlo Simulation one combines both the distributions for future prediction of claim amount. This paper shows a comparison of the above techniques on motor vehicle claims data.


2019 ◽  
Vol 276 ◽  
pp. 04006
Author(s):  
Md Ashraful Alam ◽  
Craig Farnham ◽  
Kazuo Emura

In Bangladesh, major floods are frequent due to its unique geographic location. About one-fourth to one-third of the country is inundated by overflowing rivers during the monsoon season almost every year. Calculating the risk level of river discharge is important for making plans to protect the ecosystem and increasing crop and fish production. In recent years, several Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods have been proposed in extreme value analysis (EVA) for assessing the flood risk in a certain location. The Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) method was employed to obtain the approximations to the posterior marginal distribution of the Generalized Extreme Value (GEV) model by using annual maximum discharges in two major river basins in Bangladesh. The discharge records of the two largest branches of the Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna river system in Bangladesh for the past 42 years were analysed. To estimate flood risk, a return level with 95% confidence intervals (CI) has also been calculated. Results show that, the shape parameter of each station was greater than zero, which shows that heavy-tailed Frechet cases. One station, Bahadurabad, at Brahmaputra river basin estimated 141,387 m3s-1 with a 95% CI range of [112,636, 170,138] for 100-year return level and the 1000-year return level was 195,018 m3s-1 with a 95% CI of [122493, 267544]. The other station, Hardinge Bridge, at Ganges basin estimated 124,134 m3 s-1 with a 95% CI of [108,726, 139,543] for 100-year return level and the 1000-year return level was 170,537 m3s-1 with a 95% CI of [133,784, 207,289]. As Bangladesh is a flood prone country, the approach of Bayesian with HMC in EVA can help policy-makers to plan initiatives that could result in preventing damage to both lives and assets.


2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
pp. 927-929 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lasse Makkonen ◽  
Matti Pajari ◽  
Maria Tikanmäki

Plotting positions are used in the extreme value analysis for many engineering applications. The authors of the discussed paper concluded based on their simulations that distribution dependent plotting position formulae provide a better fit to the underlying cumulative distribution than the distribution free Weibull formula. We show here by Monte Carlo simulations following the theory of probability that the opposite is true, and outline that the criteria used in the comparisons made by the authors of discussed paper are inappropriate. Accordingly, the Weibull formula should be used as the unique plotting position.


2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 2783-2805
Author(s):  
Y. Luo ◽  
D. Sui ◽  
H. Shi ◽  
Z. Zhou ◽  
D. Wang

Abstract. We use a novel statistical approach-MGPD to analyze the joint probability distribution of storm surge events at two sites and present a warning method for storm surges at two adjacent positions in Beibu Gulf, using the sufficiently long field data on surge levels at two sites. The methodology also develops the procedure of application of MGPD, which includes joint threshold and Monte Carlo simulation, to handle multivariate extreme values analysis. By comparing the simulation result with analytic solution, it is shown that the relative error of the Monte Carlo simulation is less than 8.6 %. By running MGPD model based on long data at Beihai and Dongfang, the simulated potential surge results can be employed in storm surge warnings of Beihai and joint extreme water level predictions of two sites.


2014 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 193-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Photiadou ◽  
MR Jones ◽  
D Keellings ◽  
CF Dewes

Extremes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Fee Schneider ◽  
Andrea Krajina ◽  
Tatyana Krivobokova

AbstractThreshold selection plays a key role in various aspects of statistical inference of rare events. In this work, two new threshold selection methods are introduced. The first approach measures the fit of the exponential approximation above a threshold and achieves good performance in small samples. The second method smoothly estimates the asymptotic mean squared error of the Hill estimator and performs consistently well over a wide range of processes. Both methods are analyzed theoretically, compared to existing procedures in an extensive simulation study and applied to a dataset of financial losses, where the underlying extreme value index is assumed to vary over time.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document