Paleoproterozoic evolution of the arc–back-arc system in the east Sarmatian Orogen (East European Craton): Zircon SHRIMP geochronology and geochemistry of the Losevo volcanic suite

2017 ◽  
Vol 317 (6) ◽  
pp. 707-753 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roman A. Terentiev ◽  
Konstantin A. Savko ◽  
M. Santosh

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michał Wyglądała ◽  
◽  
Andrzej Konon ◽  
Barbara Rybak-Ostrowska ◽  
Anna Haluch


2021 ◽  
Vol 57 ◽  
pp. 239-273
Author(s):  
Allan Ludman ◽  
Christopher McFarlane ◽  
Amber T.H. Whittaker

Volcanic rocks in the Miramichi inlier in Maine occur in two areas separated by the Bottle Lake plutonic complex: the Danforth segment (Stetson Mountain Formation) north of the complex and Greenfield segment to the south (Olamon Stream Formation). Both suites are dominantly pyroclastic, with abundant andesite, dacite, and rhyolite tuffs and subordinate lavas, breccias, and agglomerates. Rare basaltic tuffs and a small area of basaltic tuffs, agglomerates, and lavas are restricted to the Greenfield segment. U–Pb zircon geochronology dates Greenfield segment volcanism at ca. 469 Ma, the Floian–Dapingian boundary between the Lower and Middle Ordovician. Chemical analyses reveal a calc-alkaline suite erupted in a continental volcanic arc, either the Meductic or earliest Balmoral phase of Popelogan arc activity. The Maine Miramichi volcanic rocks are most likely correlative with the Meductic Group volcanic suite in west-central New Brunswick. Orogen-parallel lithologic and chemical variations from New Brunswick to east-central Maine may result from eruptions at different volcanic centers. The bimodal Poplar Mountain volcanic suite at the Maine–New Brunswick border is 10–20 myr younger than the Miramichi volcanic rocks and more likely an early phase of back-arc basin rifting than a late-stage Meductic phase event. Coeval calc-alkaline arc volcanism in the Miramichi, Weeksboro–Lunksoos Lake, and Munsungun Cambrian–Ordovician inliers in Maine is not consistent with tectonic models involving northwestward migration of arc volcanism. This >150 km span cannot be explained by a single east-facing subduction zone, suggesting more than one subduction zone/arc complex in the region.



2016 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. V. Lubnina ◽  
A. M. Pasenko ◽  
M. A. Novikova ◽  
A. Yu. Bubnov


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maiia Anosova ◽  
Anton Latyshev ◽  
Alexey Khotylev

<p>     The research object is magmatic bodies from the southern, central and northern parts of the Bashkirian megazone (the Southern Urals, meridian length of the Bashkirian megazone - 300 km). Most of the study intrusions have the Riphean age. In the Riphean the Bashkirian megazone was part of the East European craton. And in the Late Paleozoic rocks of the Bashkirian megazone were involved in the collision process. The formation of most studies bodies is associated with the Mashak magmatic event (the Riphean), which marks the collapse of the super-continent Nuna.</p><p>     The Middle Paleozoic component was isolated in 28 bodies. Probably it is the secondary component, that is widespread on the Southern Urals and has been repeatedly identified by other researchers. Directions comparison from different districts showed that there was a rotation of the southern, northern and central blocks of Bashkirian megazone relative to each other during the Late Paleozoic collision. At the same time, paleomagnetic directions from the northern regions (which are about 40-50 km apart from each other) statistically coincide or differ not so much. Which means that they were stable or relatively stable.</p><p>     Besides, the Riphean component was isolated and the paleomagnetic pole for the boundary of the Lower and Middle Riphean of the East European Craton (1349+/-11 Ma) is calculated from 8 thin sheet intrusions. Plat=8.4; Plong=162.4; A95=4.1.</p>





2019 ◽  
Vol 331 ◽  
pp. 105352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariusz Paszkowski ◽  
Bartosz Budzyń ◽  
Stanisław Mazur ◽  
Jiří Sláma ◽  
Leonid Shumlyanskyy ◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document