An improved apparent polar wander path for southwest Japan: post-Cretaceous multiphase rotations with respect to the Asian continent

To construct the Mesozoic apparent polar wander path (APWP) for the inner arc of the southwestern Japanese islands (referred to as southwest Japan) and compare it to that of East Asia, a 110 Ma paleomagnetic pole for southwest Japan was determined. Mudstone and sandstone samples were collected from 16 sites for paleomagnetic analysis in the Lower Cretaceous Inakura Formation of the Inakura area in the central part of southwest Japan. A high-temperature magnetization component, with unblocking temperatures of 670–695 °C, was isolated from 12 sites of red mudstone. Of these, 11 sites revealed a primary remanent magnetization during the Early Cretaceous. The primary directions combined with the previously reported ones provide a new mean direction (D = 79.7°, I = 47.4°, α95 = 6.5°, N = 17), and a corresponding paleomagnetic pole that is representative of southwest Japan (24.6° N, 203.1° E, A95 = 6.8°). The Early Cretaceous paleomagnetic pole, together with the Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic poles, constitute a new APWP for southwest Japan. The new APWP illustrates a standstill polar position during 110–70 Ma, suggesting tectonic quiescence of this region. This standstill was followed by two large tracks during the Cenozoic. We interpret these tracks as clockwise tectonic rotations of southwest Japan that occurred twice during the Cenozoic. The earlier tectonic rotation occurred for a tectonic unit positioned below northeast China, the Liaodong and Korean Peninsulas, and southwest Japan (East Tan-Lu Block) during the Paleogene. The later rotation took place only under southwest Japan during the Neogene. Cenozoic multiphase rifting activity in the eastern margin of the Asian continent was responsible for the tectonic rotations that are observed from the paleomagnetic studies. Intermittent rifting may constitute a series of phenomena due to asthenospheric convection, induced by the growth of the Eurasian mega-continent in the Mesozoic.

Archean geodynamics: Ephemeral supercontinents or long-lived supercratons

Many Archean cratons exhibit Paleoproterozoic rifted margins, implying they were pieces of some ancestral landmass(es). The idea that such an ancient continental assembly represents an Archean supercontinent has been proposed but remains to be justified. Starkly contrasting geological records between different clans of cratons have inspired an alternative hypothesis where cratons were clustered in multiple, separate “supercratons.” A new ca. 2.62 Ga paleomagnetic pole from the Yilgarn craton of Australia is compatible with either two successive but ephemeral supercontinents or two long-lived supercratons across the Archean-Proterozoic transition. Neither interpretation supports the existence of a single, long-lived supercontinent, suggesting that Archean geodynamics were fundamentally different from subsequent times (Proterozoic to present), which were influenced largely by supercontinent cycles.

Paleomagnetism of the ~860 Ma Manso dyke swarm, West Africa: implications for the assembly of Rodinia

<p>The West African Craton (WAC) is one of the major cratons in the Rodinia jigsaw puzzle (~1000–750 Ma). In the Rodinian models, the position of West Africa is mainly constrained by the assumption that it had been a partner of Amazonia since the Paleoproterozoic. Unfortunately, no paleomagnetic data are available for these cratons when the Rodina supercontinent is considered tectonically stable (~1000-750 Ma). Thus, every new reliable paleomagnetic pole for the West African Craton during the Neoproterozoic times is of paramount importance to constrain its position and testing the Rodinia models. In this study we present a combined paleomagnetic and geochronological investigation for the Manso dyke swarm in the Leo-Man Shield, southern West Africa (Ghana). The ~860 Ma emplacement age for the NNW-trending Manso dykes is thus well-constrained by two new U-Pb apatite ages of 857.2 ± 8.5 Ma and 855 ± 16 Ma, in agreement with baddeleyite data. Remanence of these coarse-to-fine grained dolerite dykes is carried by stable single to pseudo-single domain (SD-PSD) magnetite. A positive baked-contact test, associated to a positive reversal test (Class-C), support the primary remanence obtained for these dykes (13 sites). Moreover, our new paleomagnetic dataset satisfy all the seven R-criteria (R=7). The ~860 Ma Manso pole can thus be considered as the first key Tonian paleomagnetic pole for West Africa. We propose that the West Africa-Baltica-Amazonia-Congo-São Francisco were associated in a long-lived WABAMGO juxtaposition (~1100–800 Ma).</p><p><strong>Keywords:</strong> West Africa, Neoproterozoic, Tonian, Rodinia, paleomagnetism.</p><p> </p>

Congo-São Francisco at 1.11 Ga and the megacontinent Umkondia

<p>Currently three supercontinent cycles have been identified and existed supercontinents named from youngest to oldest: Pangea, Rodinia and Nuna/Columbia. Recently Wang et al. (2020) suggested that supercontinent amalgamation were each preceded by ~200 Myr by the assembly of long-lasting <em>megacontinent</em> aking to Gondwana.</p><p>The Congo-São Francisco (C/SF) craton is a main building block in Gondwana due to its central location, but its participation to Rodinia is controversial. Salminen et al. (2018) presented 1.11 Ga paleomagnetic and geochronological data from a prominent Epembe-Huila swarm of gabbronoritic dykes in the southern part of the Congo craton in Namibia and in Angola. This paleomagnetic pole yields a relatively low paleolatitude for the C/SF craton at ca. 1.11 Ga and permits a direct connection between Congo and Kalahari cratons. This connection supports an earlier qualitative comparison (Ernst et al., 2013), that the mafic Epembe-Huila swarm was an integral component of the Umkondo Large Igneous Province (LIP). The 1.11 Ga Umkondo LIP is widespread across Kalahari craton, and coeval mafic magmatism has been identified in several of the world’s other late Mesoproterozoic cratons: Laurentia, India, Amazonia, and Antarctica (Grunehogna). Were these coeval provinces spatially linked at the time of emplacement during the amalgamation of Rodinia? Robust paleomagnetic and geochronological data from Laurentia and Kalahari have demonstrated substantial separation between those two blocks at 1.11 Ga (Swanson-Hysell et al., 2015). However, based on similar tholeiitic magmatism Choudhary et al. (2019) proposed that Kalahari and C/SF together with Amazonia and northern India constituted “Umkondia” at 1.11 Ga. It has been proposed that Umkondia occupied an intermediary “megacontinental” role in the Nuna-Rodinia transition analogous to Gondwana in Rodinia-Pangea evolution (Wang et al., 2020). Contradicting Gondwana the proposed Umkondia was not long-lasting, since it has been proposed that Kalahari and Congo separated after 1.10 Ga to form a vast ocean (ca. 6000 km) during the formation of Rodinia and widespread juvenile intra-oceanic magmatism along the present-day central Brazil indicates a large ca. 0.94 Ga ocean between C/SF and Amazonia (Cordani et al., 2003).</p><p> </p><p>Choudhary et al. 2019. Precambrian Research 332, 105382.</p><p>Cordani et al. 2003. Gondwana Research 6, 275-283.</p><p>Ernst et al. 2003. Lithos 174 1-14.</p><p>Salminen et al. 2018. Geology 46, 1011-1014.</p><p>Swanson-Hysell et al. 2015. Geophysical Journal International 203, 2237-2247.</p><p>Wang et al. 2020. Geology 49, https://doi.org/10.1130/G47988.1</p><p> </p>

Cretaceous paleomagnetic directions in different volcanics in Chukotka (NE Russia)

<p>The Cretaceous Okhotsk-Chukotka volcanic belt (OChVB) is one of the largest provinces of continental marginal magmatism with length more than 3000 km along the Pacific edge of Asia. In the field studies of 2019 and 2020 we sampled 21 sections in the northern part of the OChVB and 3 sections from basement of OChVB. These sections are represented by basalts and andesites; their tuffs, ignibrites and other volcanic rocks are much less common. The age of these volcanics is estimated based on U-Pb and Ar-Ar published data and our new Ar-Ar dates.</p><p>Based on the obtained data, a new paleomagnetic pole for the Chukotka part of the OChVB was calculated. The latitude of this paleomagnetic pole differs from the expected one when compared with that calculated for Chukotka from published data from Besse and Courtillot, 2003; Torsvik et al., 2012. These results are inconsistent with most of the existing geological data. Only a few works admit younger displacements in the southern part of the Verkhoyansk fold belt or in modern diffuse boundary of the Eurasian and North American plates. Moreover, we compare our OChVB pole with results from basaltic complexes from the basement, which has been likely remagnetized when OChVB was formed.</p><p>Acknowledgements: study of cretaceous volcanics is supported by RSF grant № 19-47-04110 and jurassic by RSF grant №18-77-10073.</p>

Skewness Pole from Magnetic Anomaly C21n Implies Rapid Early Eocene True Polar Wander

<p>Skewness analysis of marine magnetic anomalies is the most misunderstood methodology in paleomagnetism. Such analysis has several advantages. First, marine magnetic anomalies innately average secular variation. Second, paleomagnetic poles determined by analysis of their skewness are not biased by overprints. Third, skewness analysis can determine high precision paleomagnetic poles. Specifically, skewness analysis of magnetic anomalies recording Late Cretaceous and early to mid-Cenozoic seafloor spreading between the Pacific and Farallon plates, because of their geometry with respect to the paleo-spin axis, results in high-precision paleomagnetic poles. These anomalies in many cases span ~140° of effective remanent inclination over a span of ~40° of latitude, reducing uncertainty by a factor of ~0.3 when mapping from direction space to pole space (Zheng et al. 2018).</p><p>Paleomagnetic poles have been previously determined from skewness analysis for six Pacific plate anomalies: C32n (74-71 Ma), C31n-C27r (60-63 Ma), C26r (62-59 Ma), C25r (59-58 Ma), C24r (57-54 Ma), C20r (46-43 Ma), and C12r (33-31 Ma). The younger group, C20r and C12r, together with independent paleo-spin axis estimates from the paleo-distribution of sediment accumulation rates from 12-46 Ma, define an approximately stationary paleo-spin axis location relative to the Pacific hotspots but offset from the current spin axis by 3°. The older group, 74-54 Ma, also shows that the Pacific hotspots remained approximately stationary relative to an additional paleo-spin axis location separated by 8° from the 12-46-Ma paleo-spin axis, implying an episode of reorientation of the entire solid earth – i.e., true polar wander (TPW) – of ~8° over at most 8 Ma between 54 and 46 Ma, or a rate of TPW of ~1°/Ma or more.</p><p>To constrain the timing and rate of reorientation, we analyze anomaly C21n (47-46 Ma), the youngest anomaly inside the 54-46-Ma interval. We incorporate 33 total-intensity ship- and 11 vector aero-magnetic track lines and find a well-constrained paleomagnetic pole near 77N, 23E in the fixed-Pacific plate reference frame.</p><p>Our new paleomagnetic pole is consistent with a prior, more uncertain, 48-Ma paleo-spin axis location from the paleo-distribution of sediment accumulation rates. When reconstructed into the Pacific hotspot reference frame, our new paleomagnetic pole lies close to the younger 46 to 12-Ma TPW stillstand location, indicating that true polar wander was completed by 47 Ma, if not earlier. Thus the ~8° shift occurred in, at most, 6.0 Ma at a rate of at least ~1.3°/Ma, and potentially even faster. The lower bound of ~1.3°/Ma of TPW indicate that Early Eocene TPW is comparable to the rate of present-day TPW (~1.1°/Ma extrapolated from geodetic data (Argus and Gross, 2004)). This new pole bounds the Early Eocene TPW episode between approximately the old and young ends of the Early Eocene Climatic Optimum (EECO; 53.2-49.1 Ma (Westerhold et al. 2018)). Thus, there may be a link between Early Eocene TPW and important climate events, such as the frequency of hyperthermals and the onset of Eocene cooling. In addition, TPW was likely complete before the 47.4-Ma age of the bends in Pacific plate hotspot chains (Gaastra & Gordon, this meeting).</p>