scholarly journals KOMPARASI CAPITAL ASSET PRICING MODEL DAN FAMA-FRENCH THREE FACTOR MODEL DALAM MEMPREDIKSI RETURN SAHAM

2018 ◽  
pp. 747
Author(s):  
Ni Putu Desy Ratna Dewi ◽  
I Wayan Suartana
Keyword(s):  
Asset Pricing ◽  
Risk Premium ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Capital Asset Pricing ◽  
Pricing Model ◽  
Capital Asset ◽  
Market Risk Premium ◽  
Asset Pricing Model ◽  
Size Premium ◽  
Market Premium

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk membandingkan kemampuan CAPM dan FF3FM dalam memprediksi return saham di Bursa Efek Indonesia.  Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah perusahaan-perusahaan terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia yang termasuk dalam kelompok saham Indeks Kompas 100 pada periode 2012-2016. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa variabel market risk premium berpengaruh positif terhadap return pada enam portofolio yang dibentuk dalam CAPM dan FF3FM. Variabel size premium berpengaruh positif pada return portofolio S/H, S/M, dan S/L dan berpengaruh negatif pada return portofolio B/H, B/M, dan B/L. Variabel book to market premium berpengaruh positif pada return portofolio B/H, S/H, dan S/M dan berpengaruh negatif pada return portofolio B/L dan S/L. Sedangkan variabel book to market premium tidak berpengaruh pada return portofolio B/M. Nilai adjusted R square CAPM dan FF3FM menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan FF3FM lebih baik dalam menjelaskan return dibandingkan CAPM.

scholarly journals Time-Varying Market Leverage and the Market Risk Premium in New Zealand

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Danyi Bao
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Asset Pricing ◽  
Risk Premium ◽  
Market Risk ◽  
Capital Asset Pricing ◽  
Time Varying ◽  
Pricing Model ◽  
Capital Asset ◽  
Market Risk Premium ◽  
Asset Pricing Model

<p>This paper applies the Ibbotson and Sinquefield (1976) method and the Lally (2002) method to New Zealand data over the period 1960-2005 in order to estimate the market risk premium (MRP) in two versions of the capital asset pricing model (CAPM). With respect to the standard CAPM, the resulting Ibbotson estimate of the MRP for New Zealand was 6.11%. The resulting Lally estimate of the MRP ranged from 5.52% (in 1970) to 18.40% (in 1990), with an average of 7.95%, and was 6.40% for 2005. With respect to the simplified Brennan-Lally CAPM, the resulting Ibbotson estimate of the MRP for New Zealand was 8.49%. The resulting Lally estimate of the MRP ranged from 7.91% (in 1970) to 20.79% (in 1990), with an average of 10.33%, and was 8.78% for 2005. The Lally and the Ibbotson estimates of the MRP are similar in general. However, when market leverage is unusually high or low, they diverge significantly. In future, practitioners may need to choose between the estimates from the two methods when market leverage goes beyond the normal level.</p>

scholarly journals Time-Varying Market Leverage and the Market Risk Premium in New Zealand

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Danyi Bao
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Asset Pricing ◽  
Risk Premium ◽  
Market Risk ◽  
Capital Asset Pricing ◽  
Time Varying ◽  
Pricing Model ◽  
Capital Asset ◽  
Market Risk Premium ◽  
Asset Pricing Model

<p>This paper applies the Ibbotson and Sinquefield (1976) method and the Lally (2002) method to New Zealand data over the period 1960-2005 in order to estimate the market risk premium (MRP) in two versions of the capital asset pricing model (CAPM). With respect to the standard CAPM, the resulting Ibbotson estimate of the MRP for New Zealand was 6.11%. The resulting Lally estimate of the MRP ranged from 5.52% (in 1970) to 18.40% (in 1990), with an average of 7.95%, and was 6.40% for 2005. With respect to the simplified Brennan-Lally CAPM, the resulting Ibbotson estimate of the MRP for New Zealand was 8.49%. The resulting Lally estimate of the MRP ranged from 7.91% (in 1970) to 20.79% (in 1990), with an average of 10.33%, and was 8.78% for 2005. The Lally and the Ibbotson estimates of the MRP are similar in general. However, when market leverage is unusually high or low, they diverge significantly. In future, practitioners may need to choose between the estimates from the two methods when market leverage goes beyond the normal level.</p>

An Empirical Test of Capital Asset-pricing Model and Three-factor Model of Fama in Indian Stock Exchange

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 294-307
Author(s):  
Nenavath Sreenu
Keyword(s):  
Asset Pricing ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Capital Asset Pricing Model ◽  
Capital Asset Pricing ◽  
Pricing Model ◽  
Capital Asset ◽  
Expected Return ◽  
Asset Pricing Model ◽  
Three Factor

This article aims to test the capital asset-pricing model (CAPM) and three-factor model of Fama in Indian Stock Exchange, and it has focused on the recent growth of capital markets in India and the need of practitioners in these markets to determine a stable price for securities, and achieving expected returns has brought into consideration the theories predicting price securities Among different models the CAPM of Sharp. The study uses a sample of daily data and annual average for 54 companies listed on the National Stock Exchange, during the period from 2010 to 2016. The research article’s intention is to find whether the relationship between expected return and risk is linear, if beta is a complete measure of the risk and if a higher risk is compensated by a higher expected return. The results confirm that the intercept is statistically insignificant, upholding theory, for both individual assets and portfolios. The tests do not essentially provide validation against CAPM and Fama; however, other simulations can be built, more close to reality, by improving the model and offering an alternative which also takes into account the specific conditions of the Indian capital market and the global financial crisis consequences.

scholarly journals Downside Risk-Based Six-Factor Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM): A New Paradigm in Asset Pricing

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (17) ◽  
pp. 6756
Author(s):  
Usman Ayub ◽  
Samaila Kausar ◽  
Umara Noreen ◽  
Muhammad Zakaria ◽  
Imran Abbas Jadoon
Keyword(s):  
Asset Pricing ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Downside Risk ◽  
Capital Asset Pricing Model ◽  
Capital Asset Pricing ◽  
Pricing Model ◽  
Capital Asset ◽  
Asset Pricing Model ◽  
Effective Manner

The importance of downside risk cannot be denied. In this study, we have replaced beta in the five-factor model of using downside beta and have added a momentum factor to suggest a new six-factor downside beta capital asset pricing model (CAPM). Two models are tested—a beta- and momentum-based six-factor model and a downside-beta- (proxy of downside risk) and momentum-based six-factor model. Beta and downside beta are highly correlated; therefore, portfolios are double-sorted to disentangle the correlation. Factor loadings, i.e., size, value, momentum, profitability, and investment, are constructed. The standard methodologies are applied. Data for sample stocks from different non-financial sectors listed in the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) are taken from January 2000 to December 2018. The PSX-100 index and three-month T-bills are taken as proxies for market and risk-free returns. The study uses three subsamples for robustness—period of very high volatility, period of stability, and period of stability and growth with volatility. The results show that the value factor is redundant in both models. The momentum factor is rejected in the beta-based six-factor model only. The beta-based six-factor model shows very low R2 in periods of highly volatility. The R2 is high for the other periods. In contrast, the downside beta six-factor model captures the downside trend of the market in an effective manner with a relatively high R2. The risk–return relationship is stronger for the downside beta model. These reasons lead us to believe that, overall, the downside beta six-factor model is a better option for investors as compared to the beta-based six-factor model in the area of asset pricing models.

scholarly journals Analisis Komparasi Capital Asset Pricing Model dan Fama-French Three Factor Model untuk Penentuan Investasi Pada Saham Indeks IDX30 (Periode 2016 – 2018)

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Nadyah Brhigitta Dwiyuningsih Dotulong ◽  
Lanto Miriatin Amali ◽  
Selvi Selvi
Keyword(s):  
Asset Pricing ◽  
Annual Report ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Capital Asset Pricing Model ◽  
Capital Asset Pricing ◽  
Pricing Model ◽  
Capital Asset ◽  
Asset Pricing Model ◽  
Three Factor

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui Metode Capital Asset Pricing Model dan Fama-French Three Factor Model untuk penentuan investasi pada saham Indeks IDX30 periode 2016 – 2018 serta untuk membandingkan antara dua model tersebut model manakah yang memiliki tingkat akurasi yang lebih tinggi untuk mempertimbangkan tingkat return dan risikonya. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah deskriptif komparatif dengan pendekatan kuantitatif. Adapun data yang digunakan adalah data berupa laporan keuangan tahunan (annual report) Indeks IDX30 periode 2016 – 2018. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Metode Capital Asset Pricing Model merupakan model yang lebih akurat dibandingkan Fama-French Three Factor Model. Selain terlihat sederhana, model Capital Asset Pricing Model ini juga lebih akurat dalam menentukan investasi sesuai dengan tingkat pengembalian yang diharapkan dan risiko yang bersedia ditanggung dan model ini dapat memberikan informasi secepat-cepatnya mengenai tingkat pengembalian dan risiko yang akan ditanggung investor. Kata-kata Kunci:Metode Capital Asset Pricing Model, Fama-French Three Factor Model, dan Indeks IDX30. 

scholarly journals A TEST OF THE FAMA-FRENCH FIVE FACTOR MODEL IN COMPARISON TO THE CAPITAL ASSET PRICING MODEL AT THE LUSAKA SECURITIES EXCHANGE

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Nsama Musawa ◽  
Prof. Sumbye Kapena ◽  
Dr . Chanda Shikaputo
Keyword(s):  
Asset Pricing ◽  
Stock Returns ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Capital Asset Pricing Model ◽  
Capital Asset Pricing ◽  
Pricing Model ◽  
Capital Asset ◽  
Asset Pricing Model ◽  
Fama And French

Purpose: The capital asset pricing model (CAPM)  is one of  the basic models in the security price analysis.Many asset pricing models have been developed to improve the CAPM.Among such models is the latest  Fama and French five factor model which is being  empirically tested in various stock markets. This study tested the five factor model in comparison to the capital asset pricing model. Testing the Fama and French Five factor model in comparison to the CAPM was important because the CAPM is widely taken to be the basic model in the security price analysis. Methodology: The Fama and French methodology was used to test  the data from an emerging market, the Lusaka Securities Exchange. A deductive, quantitative research design and secondary data from the Lusaka Securities Exchange was used. Data was analyzed using multiple regression. Results: The results indicate that the Five Factor model is better than the CAPM in capturing variation in the stock returns. The Adjusted R-squared for the five factor model from all individual portfolio sorting was 0.9, while that for the CAPM was 0.13 Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy: This study has contributed to theory in that it has added a voice to the ongoing debt on the suitability of  the new Fama and French Five Factor model which is at the cutting hedge in finance theory.Further the study is from developing capital market. Keywords:, CAPM, Stock returns, Fama and French five factor model

scholarly journals Testing Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) on Dhaka Stock Exchange

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ataur Rahman Chowdhury
Keyword(s):  
Asset Pricing ◽  
Risk Premium ◽  
Stock Prices ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Securities Market ◽  
Capital Asset Pricing Model ◽  
Capital Asset Pricing ◽  
Pricing Model ◽  
Capital Asset ◽  
Asset Pricing Model

Abstract The study focuses on finding the validity of the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) on the Dhaka Stock Exchange (DSE) on both individual securities and portfolio levels. Using 102 securities data with the monthly stock prices for preceding five years, the outcome suggests that CAPM does not hold true for DSE, both on an individual company level and portfolio level. The securities market of Bangladesh (DSE in this case) proved inefficient as unsystematic risk premium become significant and beta cannot measure the risk component of securities investment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document