scholarly journals MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY IN THE COMPLEX TREATMENT OF ACUTE PANCREATITIS

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-52
Author(s):  
E. E. Topuzov ◽  
V. K. Balashov ◽  
E. G. Topuzov ◽  
B. G. Tsatinyan

For the purpose of justification for the use of various minimally invasive interventions in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe acute pancreatitis, the authors retrospectively analyzed the data of medical documentation for the period from 2009 to 2017, shows the results of surgical and medicinal treatment, the structure of mortality and complications depending on the choice of surgical manual for patients with acute pancreatitis. The possibilities of minimally invasive methods of surgical treatment in comparison with traditional operations are presented. It is shown that the use of minimally invasive techniques in the treatment of pancreatic necrosis significantly reduces the level of mortality associated with complications of infected pancreatonecrosis, and also reduces the level of postoperative complications.

Author(s):  
Eldar E. Topuzov ◽  
Bella G. Tsatinyan ◽  
Eskender G. Topuzov ◽  
Vyacheslav K. Balashov ◽  
Esma A. Arshba ◽  
...  

Background. In recent years, the lethality from acute pancreatitis in Russia has not undergone significant changes and according to various data is from 15% to 25%. Purpose. The evaluation of the performing minimally invasive interventions in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe acute pancreatitis. Materials and methods. The authors retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 169 patients, the structure of mortality and complications depending on the choice of surgical intervention for the patients with acute pancreatitis of moderate and severe degree. Results. Lethal outcomes in the group of patients using minimally invasive interventions amounted to 11.5%, in the group of patients using traditional operations 37.5%, p 0.05. Laparoscopic interventions were effective in 88.8% of the cases, and drug therapy had a positive effect in 81.2% of the cases, p 0.05. Conclusion. It is shown that the use of minimally invasive techniques in the treatment of pancreatic necrosis significantly reduces the levels of mortality, postoperative complications, which improves the overall results of acute pancreatitis treatment.


2020 ◽  
pp. 16-18
Author(s):  
A. G. Drozdova

Summary. The aim of the study. To improve the results of surgical treatment of patients with acute pancreatitis using minimal invasive techniques. Matherials and Methods of the study. The results of surgical treatment of 75 patients with different forms of acute pancreatitis were analyzed. All patients were examined and operated on. Results of the study. Minimally invasive interventions were performed in 92 % of the analyzed patients. Intraoperatively acute pancreatic edema was observed in 43 % of patients, hemorrhagic pancreatic necrosis – in 24 %, infected pancreatic necrosis – in 33 %. The postoperative period was complicated by 13.3 %, the mortality rate was 9.3 %. Conclusions. The use of minimally invasive techniques for treating acute pancreatitis can significantly improve the results of surgical treatment of patients with this pathology. The frequency of complications and lethality decreases. Also, it is possible to significantly reduce operational trauma, and hence the number of bed-days of stay in hospital treatment. This contributes to reducing the financial cost of treatment in patients with acute pancreatitis, as well as improving the quality of life of this category of patients.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Güntuğ Batıhan ◽  
Kenan Can Ceylan

Minimally invasive techniques in thoracic surgery have made great progress over the past 20 years and are still evolving. Many surgical procedures performed with large thoracotomy incisions in the past can now be performed with much smaller incisions. With many studies, the advantages of minimally invasive surgery have been clearly seen, and thus its use has become widespread worldwide. Today, minimally invasive surgical methods have become the first choice in the diagnosis and treatment of lung, pleural and mediastinal pathologies. Minimally invasive approaches in thoracic surgery include many different techniques and applications. In this chapter, current minimally invasive techniques in thoracic surgery are discussed and important points are emphasized in the light of the current literature.


2019 ◽  
pp. 63-65
Author(s):  
A. G. Drozdova

Abstract. The aim of the study. To improve the results of surgical treatment of patients with acute pancreatitis using minimal invasive techniques. Matherials and Methods of the study. The results of surgical treatment of 75 patients with different forms of acute pancreatitis were analyzed. All patients were examined and operated on. Results of the study. Minimally invasive interventions were performed in 92% of the analyzed patients. Intraoperatively acute pancreatic edema was observed in 43% of patients, hemorrhagic pancreatic necrosis – in 24%, infected pancreatic necrosis – in 33%. The postoperative period was complicated by 13.3%, the mortality rate was 9.3%. Conclusions. The use of minimally invasive techniques for treating acute pancreatitis can significantly improve the results of surgical treatment of patients with this pathology. The frequency of complications and lethality decreases. Also, it is possible to significantly reduce operational trauma, and hence the number of bed-days of stay in hospital treatment. This contributes to reducing the financial cost of treatment in patients with acute pancreatitis, as well as improving the quality of life of this category of patients.


Pancreas ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 38 (8) ◽  
pp. 867-875 ◽  
Author(s):  
Udayakumar Navaneethan ◽  
Santhi Swaroop Vege ◽  
Suresh T. Chari ◽  
Todd H. Baron

2007 ◽  
Vol 194 (4) ◽  
pp. S24-S27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens Werner ◽  
Werner Hartwig ◽  
Thilo Hackert ◽  
Markus W. Büchler

Open Medicine ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 580-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ignasi Poves ◽  
Fernando Burdío ◽  
Dimitri Dorcaratto ◽  
Luis Grande

AbstractOpen necrosectomy, the standard surgical treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN), presents a high rate of postoperative complications and an associated mortality of 20–60%. In the last decade various minimally invasive approaches (MIA) have been proposed for the treatment of IPN and the results seem to improve on those reported with open necrosectomy. These MIA include: percutaneous, retroperitoneal, endoscopic (endoluminal) and laparoscopic (transperitoneal). The adoption of the step-up approach in the management of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) facilitates the implementation of MIA as the surgical treatment of choice in most cases. Since MIA require the expertise of radiologists, endoscopists and surgeons, patients suffering SAP should be treated by multidisciplinary teams in referral centers. We describe the MIA currently available and discuss their advantages, disadvantages, and results.


2011 ◽  
Vol 68 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. ons208-ons216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard J. Mannion ◽  
Adrian M. Nowitzke ◽  
Johnny Efendy ◽  
Martin J. Wood

Abstract BACKGROUND: Although minimally invasive surgery for intradural tumors offers the potential benefits of less postoperative pain, a quicker recovery, and the avoidance of long-term instability from multilevel laminectomy, there are concerns over whether one can safely and effectively remove intradural extramedullary tumors in a fashion comparable to open techniques and whether the advantages of minimally invasive surgery are clinically significant. OBJECTIVE: To review our early experience with minimally invasive techniques for intradural extramedullary tumors of the spine. METHODS: Thirteen intradural tumors (1 cervical, 6 thoracic, 6 lumbar) in 11 patients were operated on using a muscle-splitting, tube-assisted paramedian oblique approach with hemilaminectomy to access the spinal canal while preserving the spinous process and ligaments. Fluoroscopy and navigation were used to determine the surgical level in all thoracic and lumbar cases. RESULTS: Satisfactory tumor resection using standard microsurgical techniques was achieved in all but 1 case using a minimally invasive approach. Surgical time and intraoperative blood loss were favorable compared with our open technique cases. There was no postoperative morbidity with the minimally invasive approach, although in 2 patients with tumors in the mid- and upper thoracic spine, the surgical incision was inaccurately placed by 1 level. In 1 case, the approach was converted to open when the tumor could not be found, and postoperatively there was a cerebrospinal fluid leak with infection that required readmission. CONCLUSION: Intradural extramedullary tumors can be safely and effectively removed using minimally invasive techniques. The pros and cons of minimally invasive vs open surgery are discussed.


2013 ◽  
Vol 35 (v2supplement) ◽  
pp. Video15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jon Kimball ◽  
Andrew Yew ◽  
Daniel C. Lu

Symptomatic disc herniation is a common indication for spinal operations. The open microscopic discectomy has been the traditional method of addressing this pathology, but minimally invasive techniques are increasingly popular.Potential advantages of the MIS microdiscectomy approach include decreased muscle and soft tissue disruption, shorter length of stay and decreased postoperative pain. Here we demonstrate an MIS microdiscectomy on a 24-year-old female with a left L-4 and L-5 radiculopathy secondary to a large L4–5 disc herniation.The video can be found here: http://youtu.be/aXyZ2FJMh2s.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document