scholarly journals A Survey on Hierarchical Planning – One Abstract Idea, Many Concrete Realizations

Author(s):  
Pascal Bercher ◽  
Ron Alford ◽  
Daniel Höller

Hierarchical planning has attracted renewed interest in the last couple of years, which led to numerous novel formalisms, problem classes, and theoretical investigations. Yet it is important to differentiate between the various formalisms and problem classes, since they show -- sometimes fundamental -- differences with regard to their expressivity and computational complexity: Some of them can be regarded equivalent to non-hierarchical formalisms while others are clearly more expressive. We survey the most important hierarchical problem classes and explain their differences and similarities. We furthermore give pointers to some of the best-known planning systems capable of solving the respective problem classes.

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (06) ◽  
pp. 9883-9891 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Höller ◽  
Gregor Behnke ◽  
Pascal Bercher ◽  
Susanne Biundo ◽  
Humbert Fiorino ◽  
...  

The research in hierarchical planning has made considerable progress in the last few years. Many recent systems do not rely on hand-tailored advice anymore to find solutions, but are supposed to be domain-independent systems that come with sophisticated solving techniques. In principle, this development would make the comparison between systems easier (because the domains are not tailored to a single system anymore) and – much more important – also the integration into other systems, because the modeling process is less tedious (due to the lack of advice) and there is no (or less) commitment to a certain planning system the model is created for. However, these advantages are destroyed by the lack of a common input language and feature set supported by the different systems. In this paper, we propose an extension to PDDL, the description language used in non-hierarchical planning, to the needs of hierarchical planning systems.


1984 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. K. Lenstra ◽  
A. H. G. Rinnooy Kan ◽  
L. Stougie

Author(s):  
Felix Lindner ◽  
Robert Mattmüller ◽  
Bernhard Nebel

Research in classical planning so far was mainly concerned with generating a satisficing or an optimal plan. However, if such systems are used to make decisions that are relevant to humans, one should also consider the ethical consequences generated plans can have. We address this challenge by analyzing in how far it is possible to generalize existing approaches of machine ethics to automatic planning systems. Traditionally, ethical principles are formulated in an actionbased manner, allowing to judge the execution of one action. We show how such a judgment can be generalized to plans. Further, we study the computational complexity of making ethical judgment about plans.


2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 413-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip G. Moscoso ◽  
Jan C. Fransoo ◽  
Dieter Fischer

2014 ◽  
Vol 68 ◽  
pp. 49-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kasper Bislev Kallestrup ◽  
Lasse Hadberg Lynge ◽  
Renzo Akkerman ◽  
Thordis Anna Oddsdottir

1981 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 707-716 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. H. Dempster ◽  
M. L. Fisher ◽  
L. Jansen ◽  
B. J. Lageweg ◽  
J. K. Lenstra ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document