scholarly journals Study of the Maxillary Sinus Floor and the Mandibular Canal as Seen in Panoramic Radiographs of Edentulous Jaws

1996 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Katsutoshi Hori
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Mandibular Canal ◽  
Panoramic Radiographs ◽  
Maxillary Sinus Floor ◽  
Sinus Floor ◽  
Edentulous Jaws

Radiologic Evaluation of Putty Versus Powder Form of Demineralized Bone Matrix in Sinus Floor Elevation

2012 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 337-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cem Üngör
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Demineralized Bone Matrix ◽  
Bone Matrix ◽  
Powder Form ◽  
Panoramic Radiographs ◽  
Sinus Lifting ◽  
Sinus Floor Augmentation ◽  
Maxillary Sinus Floor ◽  
Sinus Floor ◽  
Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation

The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in ossification of the 2 forms of demineralized bone matrix (DBM)—putty and powder—radiographically, using digital densitometry on panoramic radiographs in maxillary sinus floor augmentation procedures. Twelve subjects needing bilateral maxillary sinus floor augmentation for the placement of osseointegrated implants were included in this study. The left and right maxillary sinuses were augmented in the same session in each patient using the 2 preferred forms of DBM—putty and powder—during the same session. One sinus was augmented with DBM putty form and the other sinus was augmented with DBM powder form randomly. Every patient had a total of 4 panoramic radiographs taken, preoperatively and in the first, third, and sixth month postoperatively. The densitometry measurements were taken from each step of the aluminium step-wedge, from both sinuses from different points a total of 3 times, and the average of these measurements was calculated. The amount of mineralization in each graft material in every radiograph was clarified by the appearance of a difference in the equivalent aluminium thickness, and the obtained results were statistically evaluated. The results showed that there were no significant differences between two graft materials statistically. These two graft materials could be good alternatives in sinus lifting procedures because of less morbidity, lower price, and good ossification. The results indicate that 2 different types of DBM achieved good ossification in the sinus lifting procedure, and there is not a considerable distinction in these 2 forms.

scholarly journals The Effect of Original and Invert Enhanced Panoramic Modality on the Assessment of the Relationship Between the Maxillary Posterior Roots and the Maxillary Sinus Floor

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 38-44
Author(s):  
Onur S¸ahin ◽  
Kemal Özgür Demiralp
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Root Apex ◽  
Preoperative Treatment ◽  
Posterior Teeth ◽  
Panoramic Radiographs ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Panoramic Images ◽  
Maxillary Sinus Floor ◽  
Sinus Floor ◽  
The Relationship

Background: Having knowledge about the anatomical and pathological relationship between the maxillary posterior root tip and the maxillary sinus floor is very significant for preoperative treatment planning. Aims and Objectives: The purpose of the present study was to compare the accuracy of original panoramic radiographs and digital panoramic images over cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images in evaluating the relationship between the maxillary posterior teeth and the maxillary sinus floor, and to verify the accuracy of the signs of the relationship between the roots of the maxillary posterior teeth and maxillary sinus on the panoramic radiographs over CBCT images. Materials and Methods: From 106 subjects (47 males and 59 females; mean age = 39 years; range = 18-67 years) referred to our university, a pair of panoramic and CBCT images was selected for further analysis. The relationship between the maxillary posterior teeth, the maxillary sinus, and panoramic radiography signs (root projection into the sinus, interruption of the maxillary sinus floor cortex, absence of lamina dura, darkening of the root apex, and curvature of the sinus floor on the root apex) associated with the protrusion of root apexes into the sinus was evaluated. Results: The P values of the data obtained from the original and invert enhanced panoramic images were .53 and .52, respectively, and there was no statistically significant difference in the accuracy of the 2 methods ( P > .05). Conclusion: The root projection into the sinus is an indicative sign of root protrusion into the sinus on CBCT.

scholarly journals Late recovery from foreign body sinusitis after maxillary sinus floor augmentation

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 (dec11 1) ◽  
pp. bcr2012007434-bcr2012007434 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Felisati ◽  
A. M. Saibene ◽  
R. Lenzi ◽  
C. Pipolo
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Body ◽  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Sinus Floor Augmentation ◽  
Maxillary Sinus Floor ◽  
Sinus Floor ◽  
Late Recovery ◽  
Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation

scholarly journals PRF-Solution in Large Sinus Membrane Perforation with Simultaneous Implant Placement-Micro CT and Histological Analysis

Membranes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 438
Author(s):  
Horia Mihail Barbu ◽  
Stefania Andrada Iancu ◽  
Violeta Hancu ◽  
Daniel Referendaru ◽  
Joseph Nissan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Micro Ct ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Membrane Perforation ◽  
Sinus Floor Augmentation ◽  
Maxillary Sinus Floor ◽  
Sinus Floor ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation ◽  
Sinus Membrane

Background: The purpose of the study was to analyze the efficacy of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) as a single augmentation material for complicated cases of maxillary sinus floor elevation, resulting from membrane perforation or previous infections. Methods: Implant insertion in the posterior region of the maxilla was simultaneously performed with maxillary sinus floor augmentation. Schneiderian membrane elevation can be accompanied by extremely serious sinus membrane perforation, due to accidental tearing or intended incision for mucocele removal. PRFs were placed in the sinus cavity both for membrane sealing and sinus floor grafting. Radiological, histological and micro-CT analyses were performed. Implant survival was assessed every 6 months for 1 to 4 years, with a mean follow up of 1.8 years, after prosthetic loading. Radiological examinations were performed on CBCT at 9 and 12 and 36 months postoperatively and revealed improved degrees of radiopacity. Results: 19 implants were simultaneously placed in the course of nine maxillary sinus floor augmentation surgeries, with successful outcomes in terms of bone grafting and implant integration. New bone formation was evidenced 12 months postoperatively on radiological examination, micro-CT analysis, and histological analysis of a harvested bone segment from the augmented maxillary sinus. The mean gain in bone height of the sinus floor augmentation was 6.43 mm, with a maximum of 9 mm. The mean amount of vital bone obtained from histologic assessment was 52.30%, while bone volume/tissue volume ratio in micro-CT 3D had a mean of 50.32%. Conclusions: PRF may be considered as an alternative treatment for a single surgery of sinus augmentation with simultaneous implant placement, even in complicated cases with significant sinus membrane tearing.

scholarly journals Intrusion of maxillary molar roots into the maxillary sinus in a sample of the Egyptian population using cone beam computed tomography

2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Esraa Ahmed Eid ◽  
Fatma Mostafa El-Badawy ◽  
Walaa Mohamed Hamed
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Egyptian Population ◽  
Maxillary Molar ◽  
Maxillary Sinus Floor ◽  
Sinus Floor ◽  
The Right

Abstract Background The proximity of the maxillary sinus floor to the maxillary molar roots increases the probability of oroantral communication on conducting any surgical or endodontic procedure in the involved area. The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship between each maxillary molar root and maxillary sinus floor using cone beam computed tomography. Predicting the probability of protrusion of each root into the sinus will consequently predict the probability of occurrence of the oroantral fistula in a sample of the Egyptian population. Results The total number of roots located outside the sinus was 121 (35.3%), while those contacting the sinus floor were 80 (23.3%) and those intruded the sinus were 141 (41.2%). The percentage of root intrusion into the sinus in males (56.9%) was significantly (p = 0.01) higher than females (42.9%). The probability of root intrusion in the left molars (54.2%) was non-significantly (p = 0.067) higher than that of the right side (44.3%). As for the type of tooth, the second molar showed the highest probability of root intrusion into the sinus (55.3%) followed by the third molars (52.6%) then the first molars (40.9). According to the type of root, the mesiobuccal root showed the highest probability of intrusion into the sinus (50.9%) followed by the palatal root (49.1%) then the distobuccal root (47.4%). However, the difference in both type of tooth and type of root was statistically non-significant (p = 0.051 and 0.869 respectively). As for the individual root with the highest probability of intrusion, the mesio-buccal root of the right third molar is the most frequent root to intrude the sinus (71.4%) and the mesio-buccal root of the right first molar is the least frequent (22.7%). Conclusions In a sample of the Egyptian population, males exhibit higher probability of root protrusion into the sinus than females. The side and type of tooth are of higher impact on the probability of its intrusion into the sinus compared to the type of root. Left second molars are at a higher risk of oroantral communications on surgical or endodontic procedures compared to other molars due to its highest probability of intrusion into the sinus.

Modification Of Maxillary Sinus Floor With Orthodontic Treatment and Implant Therapy: A Case Letter

2012 ◽  
pp. 141208072802005
Author(s):  
mehmet saglam ◽  
Serhan Akman ◽  
Sıddık Malkoç ◽  
Sema Sezgin Hakkı
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Maxillary Sinus Floor ◽  
Sinus Floor ◽  
Implant Therapy
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document