scholarly journals Numerical Study on Trailing-Edge Noise Attenuation using 3D-Printed Porous Insert

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Teruna ◽  
Francesco Avallone ◽  
Daniele Ragni ◽  
Damiano Casalino ◽  
Alejandro Rubio Carpio
Author(s):  
Marco Sansone ◽  
Lap D. Nguyen ◽  
Vladimir V. Golubev ◽  
Reda R. Mankbadi

Author(s):  
Lap D. Nguyen ◽  
Vladimir V. Golubev ◽  
Reda R. Mankbadi ◽  
Marco Sansone

AIAA Journal ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 2206-2216 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Oberai ◽  
F. Roknaldin ◽  
T. J. R. Hughes

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (3-5) ◽  
pp. 191-206
Author(s):  
Trae L Jennette ◽  
Krish K Ahuja

This paper deals with the topic of upper surface blowing noise. Using a model-scale rectangular nozzle of an aspect ratio of 10 and a sharp trailing edge, detailed noise contours were acquired with and without a subsonic jet blowing over a flat surface to determine the noise source location as a function of frequency. Additionally, velocity scaling of the upper surface blowing noise was carried out. It was found that the upper surface blowing increases the noise significantly. This is a result of both the trailing edge noise and turbulence downstream of the trailing edge, referred to as wake noise in the paper. It was found that low-frequency noise with a peak Strouhal number of 0.02 originates from the trailing edge whereas the high-frequency noise with the peak in the vicinity of Strouhal number of 0.2 originates near the nozzle exit. Low frequency (low Strouhal number) follows a velocity scaling corresponding to a dipole source where as the high Strouhal numbers as quadrupole sources. The culmination of these two effects is a cardioid-shaped directivity pattern. On the shielded side, the most dominant noise sources were at the trailing edge and in the near wake. The trailing edge mounting geometry also created anomalous acoustic diffraction indicating that not only is the geometry of the edge itself important, but also all geometry near the trailing edge.


Author(s):  
Dian Li ◽  
Xiaomin Liu ◽  
Lei Wang ◽  
Fujia Hu ◽  
Guang Xi

Previous publications have summarized that three special morphological structures of owl wing could reduce aerodynamic noise under low Reynolds number flows effectively. However, the coupling noise-reduction mechanism of bionic airfoil with trailing-edge serrations is poorly understood. Furthermore, while the bionic airfoil extracted from natural owl wing shows remarkable noise-reduction characteristics, the shape of the owl-based airfoils reconstructed by different researchers has some differences, which leads to diversity in the potential noise-reduction mechanisms. In this article, three kinds of owl-based airfoils with trailing-edge serrations are investigated to reveal the potential noise-reduction mechanisms, and a clean airfoil based on barn owl is utilized as a reference to make a comparison. The instantaneous flow field and sound field around the three-dimensional serrated airfoils are simulated by using incompressible large eddy simulation coupled with the FW-H equation. The results of unsteady flow field show that the flow field of Owl B exhibits stronger and wider-scale turbulent velocity fluctuation than that of other airfoils, which may be the potential reason for the greater noise generation of Owl B. The scale and magnitude of alternating mean convective velocity distribution dominates the noise-reduction effect of trailing-edge serrations. The noise-reduction characteristic of Owl C outperforms that of Barn owl, which suggests that the trailing-edge serrations can suppress vortex shedding noise of flow field effectively. The trailing-edge serrations mainly suppress the low-frequency noise of the airfoil. The trailing-edge serration can suppress turbulent noise by weakening pressure fluctuation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document