scholarly journals Reasons for Appealing an Administrative Act and Enforce an Administrative Obligation in Court According to the Law of the Federal Republic of Germany

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 22-28
Author(s):  
D. Olejnik
Keyword(s):  
Federal Republic ◽  
Federal Republic Of Germany ◽  
Legal Requirements ◽  
Legal Provision ◽  
Administrative Act ◽  
The Law ◽  
Substantive Law

The article considers the reasons for appealing an administrative act and enforce an obligation in court according to the law of the Federal Republic of Germany. In particular, the reasons for appealing of an administrative act is its iIllegality and the resulting violation of the plaintiff's rights. Herewith, an administrative act is legal (not unlawful), if it is based on a legal provision, authorizing administration to act this way, at its issuance the legal requirements of procedural norms (formal legality) and substantive law (material legality) were complied with. The reasons to enforce an administrative obligation are the illegality of the refusal to issue the required administrative act, as a result of which the rights of the plaintiff were violated and the case is prepared for making a decision.

scholarly journals REMUNERATION OF PUBLIC SERVANTS IN THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 228
Author(s):  
Larysa Nalyvaiko ◽  
Galiya Chanysheva ◽  
Serhii Kozin
Keyword(s):  
Federal Republic ◽  
Public Service ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Civil Servants ◽  
Structural Method ◽  
Federal Republic Of Germany ◽  
Public Servants ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Public Servant ◽  
The Law

The aim of the article is to determine the specificities of the remuneration of civil servants in the Federal Republic of Germany. The subject of the study is the remuneration of civil servants in the Federal Republic of Germany. Methodology. The study is based on the use of general scientific and special-scientific methods and techniques of scientific knowledge. The dialectical method enabled to interrogate the development of the institution of the remuneration of civil servants in the Federal Republic of Germany. The comparative legal method enabled to compare doctrinal approaches to this issue. The system-structural method enabled to determine the elements of the remuneration of civil servants of the Federal Republic of Germany. Methods of analysis and synthesis helped study certain parts of this institute to formulate further conclusions about its most optimal functioning. The logicsemantic method was used to determine the content of the principles of “ensuring a decent standard of living for a public servant,” “equality of public service actors” and “allowance/supplies”. The normative-dogmatic method enabled to analyse the content of legal regulations of the domestic legislation and the legislation of the Federal Republic of Germany on the issue. Practical implications. The determination of the specificities of the remuneration of public servants in the Federal Republic of Germany enabled to make recommendations for improving the remuneration system of this category of employees in Ukraine, as well as identify problematic issues that require further consideration and research. Relevance/originality. The author’s definition of the concept of “remuneration of public servants” is proposed and the specific features of this institute, insufficiently studied before, are analysed. The article analyses the specificities of the remuneration of public servants. Their list is determined and the content of each of them is disclosed. The specificities of the remuneration of public servants are substantiated in comparison with other categories of employees. The study of the positive experience of Germany enabled to suggest: to adopt a special legal regulation on the remuneration of public servants in Ukraine, that is, the Law of Ukraine “On Remuneration of Public Servants”; to provide in the norms of the Law of Ukraine “On Public Service” the allowances for the professionalism of a public servant; to provide public servants with the opportunity to carry out another paid activity subject to the special permission of the head of a state body.

The Dispute on Jurisdictional Immunities of the State before the ICJ: Is the Time Ripe for a Change of the Law?

2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 173-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANDREA GATTINI
Keyword(s):  
Federal Republic ◽  
The State ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Federal Republic Of Germany ◽  
Future Developments ◽  
State Practice ◽  
The Icj ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Jus Cogens

AbstractThe pending dispute at the ICJ between the Federal Republic of Germany and the Republic of Italy on jurisdictional immunities of states bears on the hotly debated question of whether a state having committed a violation of jus cogens loses its immunity from civil jurisdiction abroad, as maintained by the Italian Court of Cassation. The article aims to demonstrate the untenability of the position of the Italian Court of Cassation, not only under current international customary law, but also under a prospective de lege ferenda. Nevertheless, different options are open to the ICJ to adjudicate the case, without impinging on possible future developments of state practice. The article closes by pointing at the risks that, in a strict dualist/pluralist perspective, not even an ICJ's decision in favour of Germany would eventually ensure compliance by Italian domestic judges.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document