scholarly journals Proportion of Subjects Achieving a Molluscum Lesion Count of 0 or 1 at the Day 84 End of Study Visit in Phase 3 Clinical Trials with VP-102 CAMP-1 and CAMP-2

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. s92
Author(s):  
Lawrence Eichenfeld ◽  
Elaine Siegfried ◽  
Pearl Kwong ◽  
Susan Cutler ◽  
Cynthia Willson ◽  
...  

N/A

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wasim Haidari ◽  
Raquel Bruinsma ◽  
Jesus Alberto Cardenas-de la Garza ◽  
Steven R. Feldman

Objective: Sarecycline is a new oral tetracycline antibiotic recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. The aim of this article was to evaluate the data from published clinical trials of sarecycline in the treatment of acne, review the drug’s pharmacology, and understand how this new medication may apply to clinical practice. Data Sources: A systematic literature review was performed using the terms sarecycline (Seysara), P005672, and WC-3035 in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. ClinicalTrials.gov was searched to identify ongoing or nonpublished studies. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Articles in English between January 2000 and April 2019 relating to clinical trials, pharmacology, safety, and microbiological profile were evaluated. Data Synthesis: In a phase 3 clinical trial (SC1401), absolute change from baseline in facial inflammatory lesion count at week 12 was −15.3 for the sarecycline arm and −10.1 for placebo ( P < 0.01). In another phase 3 clinical trial (SC1402), the absolute change in this category was −15.7 for sarecycline and −10.7 for placebo ( P < 0.01). Mean percentage change in facial inflammatory lesion count was higher in the sarecycline group than in the placebo group in both studies ( P < 0.01). Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: The 1.5-mg/kg sarecycline dose has efficacy in reducing inflammatory lesions, is well tolerated, and has more targeted antimicrobial activity, which may help reduce the risk of developing antibiotic resistance. Conclusions: This novel, once-daily treatment may represent a useful treatment for patients with moderate to severe acne.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. S40
Author(s):  
P Van de Kerkhof ◽  
A Pinter ◽  
M Boehnlein ◽  
S Kavanagh ◽  
J.J. Crowley

Abstract not available.


2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 214-219
Author(s):  
Robyn J. Barst

Drug development is the entire process of introducing a new drug to the market. It involves drug discovery, screening, preclinical testing, an Investigational New Drug (IND) application in the US or a Clinical Trial Application (CTA) in the EU, phase 1–3 clinical trials, a New Drug Application (NDA), Food and Drug Administration (FDA) review and approval, and postapproval studies required for continuing safety evaluation. Preclinical testing assesses safety and biologic activity, phase 1 determines safety and dosage, phase 2 evaluates efficacy and side effects, and phase 3 confirms efficacy and monitors adverse effects in a larger number of patients. Postapproval studies provide additional postmarketing data. On average, it takes 15 years from preclinical studies to regulatory approval by the FDA: about 3.5–6.5 years for preclinical, 1–1.5 years for phase 1, 2 years for phase 2, 3–3.5 years for phase 3, and 1.5–2.5 years for filing the NDA and completing the FDA review process. Of approximately 5000 compounds evaluated in preclinical studies, about 5 compounds enter clinical trials, and 1 compound is approved (Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, 2011). Most drug development programs include approximately 35–40 phase 1 studies, 15 phase 2 studies, and 3–5 pivotal trials with more than 5000 patients enrolled. Thus, to produce safe and effective drugs in a regulated environment is a highly complex process. Against this backdrop, what is the best way to develop drugs for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), an orphan disease often rapidly fatal within several years of diagnosis and in which spontaneous regression does not occur?


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 1194-1200
Author(s):  
Claudio Campa

: This review focuses on 5 new anti-VEGF drugs in the advanced stage of clinical development (i.e., phase 3): conbercept, brolucizumab, port delivery system with ranibizumab, abicipar pegol and faricimab. : Results of clinical trials and the advantages of each drug compared to the available molecules are discussed in detail.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document