Read distance performance and variation of 5 low-frequency radio frequency identification panel transceiver manufacturers1,2

2010 ◽  
Vol 88 (7) ◽  
pp. 2514-2522 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. E. Ryan ◽  
D. A. Blasi ◽  
C. O. Anglin ◽  
A. M. Bryant ◽  
B. A. Rickard ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 556-562 ◽  
pp. 2895-2898
Author(s):  
Wei Dong Yang ◽  
Li Li ◽  
Kai Peng

In car tires coded identification system, radio frequency technology plays a vital role, the key to radio frequency signals transmitted process is waveform modulation. The key of adjusting the waveform is how to match its resistor and capacitor easily. In the paper their resistance and capacitance values are optimized by using the simulation software (Protues) to simulate the transmitted waveform, and based on matching results the optimized physical models are produced. The actual test results agree well with the simulation results. The method of simulation tests can save the resources effectively, and shorten the development time.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-145
Author(s):  
Jon W. Wallace ◽  
Leah C. Diamantides ◽  
Kwanho Claudia Ki ◽  
Michael W. Butler

2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (17) ◽  
pp. 3619-3624
Author(s):  
APHAIPHAK PRATOOMTHIP ◽  
ANAN KRUESUBTHAWORN ◽  
CHIRANUT SA-NGIAMSAK ◽  
APIRAT SIRITARATIWAT ◽  
PONCHAI PAKPONGSIRI

This article presents the effect of Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) at 125 kHz on GMR recording heads. The study is mainly concerned with the RFID effect on recording heads in terms of the distance (r) between the antenna reader of the RFID and the recording head, the coil radius (a) of the antenna reader, and the angle (θ) between antenna reader and recording head. The maximum error of the writing current is found in this experiment of about 2.5% (where r < a). An increase of angle affects the writing current error when the radius increases. It is found that the writing current error decreases when r > a. SEM result shows that radiated fields of RFID do not visibly degrade the writer part but only disturbance to recording heads in testing is found.


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 579-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. M. Brown-Brandl ◽  
F. Adrion ◽  
J. Maselyne ◽  
A. Kapun ◽  
E. F. Hessel ◽  
...  

Abstract. Animal facilities are increasing in size, while the availability of skilled workers is decreasing, thus, making it difficult for the farm laborers to ensure the health and well-being of all animals under their care. Passive Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) systems have been successfully used in animal facilities and research has identified potential applications in behavior monitoring for automated illness detection. While RFID signals range in frequency from 9 kHz to 5.8 GHz, the three most common frequencies are Low Frequency (LF, 125 kHz or 134.2 kHz), High Frequency (HF, 13.56 MHz), and Ultra-High Frequency (UHF, 865-868 MHz or 902-928 MHz). The objective of this article is to compare and evaluate the application of these three different RFID systems within large research facilities for livestock and poultry in terms of hardware characteristics, system design, and data processing and usage. Differences in tag construction, availability and cost are evident, but also basic differences in reader and antenna function, such as physics of communication, speed of detection, and anti-collision procedures exist. The systems have significant differences in reading ranges and are known to have varying influence of materials, especially water and metal, on the performance of the systems. However, the data streams, as well as methods of data processing and the creation of events (e.g., visits to a feeder), are similar for all systems. The characteristics mentioned do not necessarily identify an ideal RFID technology but reveal positive and negative aspects of each system. The three different RFID systems have been successfully applied in livestock and poultry facilities. Current research is focused on the utilization of the RFID data in prediction and decision models for illness, animal welfare, and management actions. Keywords: Behavior, Cattle, Frequency ranges, Health and welfare, Poultry, Swine, Transponder.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document