FUNCTIONS OF MEDIATION IN DISPUTES IN RELATION TO APPEAL DECISION, ACTION OR INACTIVITY AUTHORITY SUBJECTS

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan Yusko ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Appeal Decision

Legal Maxims: Summaries and Extracts from Selected Case Law

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Buono ◽  
Nadia Napoli ◽  
Anna Oriolo ◽  
Caterina Tuosto ◽  
Anna Vigorito
Keyword(s):  
Democratic Republic ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Trial Chamber ◽  
Republic Of The Congo ◽  
Appeal Decision

1.SITUATION IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGOThe Prosecutor v. Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui, Case No. ICC-01/04-02/12-A, Appeals Chamber Judgment on the Prosecutor’s Appeal Decision of Trial Chamber II Entitled “Judgment Pursuant to article 74 of the Statute”, 27 February 2015The Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo...

Fracturing Constitutional Rights: The Prosecution of Alleged Broadcast Infringers in Nigeria

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Bankole Sodipo
Keyword(s):  
Civil Liability ◽  
Copyright Infringement ◽  
Law Reform ◽  
Constitutional Rights ◽  
Appeal Decision ◽  
Written Law ◽  
Court Of Appeal ◽  
Material Form

Abstract Infringement of broadcasts is often treated as a crime. The Nigerian Constitution guarantees that no-one can be prosecuted for any act that is not prescribed in a written law. Section 20 of Nigeria's Copyright Act only criminalizes dealing with infringing copies. A “copy” is defined in terms of material form. An infringing broadcast therefore connotes a recorded broadcast or a copy of a broadcast. This article argues that, statutorily, not every act that gives rise to civil liability for broadcast copyright infringement constitutes a crime. The article reviews the first broadcast copyright prosecution Court of Appeal decision in Eno v Nigerian Copyright Commission. Eno was unlawfully prosecuted, convicted and imprisoned. The article seeks to stem the wave of prosecutions on the type of charges used in Eno. In the absence of law reform, the prosecutions based on the line of charges in Eno constitute a fracturing of constitutional rights.

Causing or inciting sexual activity with persons who have a mental disorder

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (21) ◽  
pp. 1258-1259
Author(s):  
Richard Griffith
Keyword(s):  
Mental Disorder ◽  
Sexual Activity ◽  
Health Law ◽  
Sexual Offences ◽  
Senior Lecturer ◽  
Care Workers ◽  
Appeal Decision ◽  
Sexual Offences Act 2003 ◽  
Court Of Appeal

Richard Griffith, Senior Lecturer in Health Law at Swansea University, discusses the implications of a Court of Appeal decision that considers the scope of the Sexual Offences Act 2003, section 39, in relation to care workers

scholarly journals The Scope of Safety Warrants Under the Children, Young Persons, and Their Families Act 1989

1997 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 301
Author(s):  
P Beverley
Keyword(s):  
Family Unit ◽  
The Family ◽  
Appeal Decision ◽  
Court Of Appeal

The Children, Young Persons, and Their Families Act 1989 ("CYPF Act") recognises that the interests of a child will be generally best served within the family unit. This recognition is subject to the qualification that a child should be removed from that unit whenever there is an unacceptable risk of harm to that child. This analysis will consider one mechanism provided by the Act to facilitate such removal, and the effect of the Court of Appeal decision in R v Kahu.

The Enduring Legacy of ‘Reckless Disregard’

2005 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 316-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
David McArdle
Keyword(s):  
British Columbia ◽  
Common Law ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Personal Injury ◽  
Duty Of Care ◽  
Canadian Province ◽  
England And Wales ◽  
Appeal Decision ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Court Of Appeal

Personal injury at common law has spawned many cases where sports participants have inflicted injury either upon other participants or upon spectators/bystanders. This paper is not an exhaustive analysis of those ‘sports torts' cases but focuses instead upon the impact of Wooldridge v Sumner, a Court of Appeal decision that was legally sound but based upon highly significant errors of fact, and which has subsequently been advanced before the courts in two jurisdictions as authority for untenable propositions that concern both the standard of care and the duty of care owed by sports participants. While a consideration of the authorities prior to Wooldridge illustrates that there was never a basis at common law for the argument that either the standard or the duty of care differed from that pertaining in non-sporting contexts, the case has been appropriated by counsel in order to argue along those lines even though Wooldridge is not authority for either proposition. On some occasions those arguments have actually received the support of the courts of England and Wales and of the Canadian Province of British Columbia. Despite the existence in both jurisdictions of more recent authorities that ought to have heralded the demise of both concepts, they have proved remarkably tenacious.

Probability reasoning in judicial fact-finding

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-94
Author(s):  
Ian Hunt ◽  
Justice Mostyn
Keyword(s):  
Bayesian Approach ◽  
Probabilistic Reasoning ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Binary Method ◽  
Appeal Decision ◽  
Fact Finding

We argue that the laws of probability promote coherent fact-finding and avoid potentially unjust logical contradictions. But we do not argue that a probabilistic Bayesian approach is sufficient or even necessary for good fact-finding. First, we explain the use of probability reasoning in Re D (A Child) [2014] EWHC 121 (Fam) and Re L (A Child) [2017] EWHC 3707 (Fam). Then we criticise the attack on this probabilistic reasoning found in Re A (Children) [2018] EWCA Civ 1718, which is the appeal decision on Re L. We conclude that the attack is unjustified and that the probability statements in the two cases were both valid and useful. We also use probabilistic reasoning to enlighten legal principles related to inherent probability, the Binary Method and the blue bus paradox.

scholarly journals Queering Judgment

2017 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. 417-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Sharpe
Keyword(s):  
Gender Identity ◽  
Sexual Offence ◽  
Identity Fraud ◽  
Appeal Decision ◽  
English Law ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Court Of Appeal

This article is a response to a series of recent successful sexual offence prosecutions brought against transgender and other gender non-conforming people for gender identity fraud, and specifically to Leveson LJ’s judgment in the Court of Appeal decision of R v McNally. The decision is now the leading authority on sexual fraud generally, and gender identity fraud specifically, under English law. The response will take the form of an academic judgment, in this instance a dissenting or counter-judgment. The article will (i) present the facts of the case, (ii) provide some detail regarding the developing jurisprudence of the courts regarding sexual fraud, (iii) preface the counter-judgment with an explanation of why an exercise in academic judgement-writing is valuable, (iv) consider a queer approach to law, and detail some queer principles around which the counter-judgment will be organised and (v) present the counter-judgment, highlighting not only that McNally could have been decided differently, but that it ought to have been decided differently.

The Licensee's Period of Grace: Bellotti Reconsidered

1996 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 229-240
Author(s):  
Tamara Kerbel
Keyword(s):  
Privy Council ◽  
Railway Company ◽  
Short Notice ◽  
Appeal Decision ◽  
The Law ◽  
Canadian Pacific Railway ◽  
Court Of Appeal

At present the law fails to provide an adequate balance between the interests of licensor and licensee when a licensor revokes a licence but gives an unreasonably short notice. The prevailing orthodoxy has followed the Court of Appeal decision in Minister of Health v. Bellotti. This article will argue that the consequences of this decision have proved disastrous for both licensors and licensees. In direct conflict with Bellotti is the Privy Council authority of Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. The King.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document