Audit of surgical lung biopsies for interstitial lung diseases, with emphasis on 90-day survival data in a tertiary referral thoracic surgery specialist centre

Author(s):  
Aurelie Fabre
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanmay S. Panchabhai ◽  
Andrea Valeria Arrossi ◽  
Kristin B. Highland ◽  
Debabrata Bandyopadhyay ◽  
Daniel A. Culver ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-63
Author(s):  
Koray Aydogdu ◽  
Gokturk Findik ◽  
Sadi Kaya ◽  
Yetkin Agackiran ◽  
Ulku Yazici ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 88 (1) ◽  
pp. 227-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin I. Sigurdsson ◽  
Helgi J. Isaksson ◽  
Gunnar Gudmundsson ◽  
Tomas Gudbjartsson

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Simpson ◽  
Shaney L Barratt ◽  
Paul Beirne ◽  
Nazia Chaudhuri ◽  
Anjali Crawshaw ◽  
...  

AbstractWhile Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) remains the exemplar progressive fibrotic lung disease, there remains a cohort of non-IPF fibrotic lung diseases (fILD) which adopt a similar clinical behaviour to IPF despite therap. This phenotypically related group of conditions, where progression of disease is similar to that seen in IPF, have recently been described as Progressive Fibrotic Interstitial Lung diseases (PF-ILD). Previous estimates suggest that between 18 to 40% of all fILD will develop progressive disease, however, the exact burden remains unknown. This retrospective, observational study therefore aimed to estimate the incidence of PF-ILD across England.All new referrals seen across nine UK centres for their first outpatient clinic appointment between 1st August 2017 and 31st January 2018 were assessed against the diagnostic criteria for PF-ILD laid out in the INBUILD trial. A total of 1749 patients with fILD were assessed. In this cohort of patients at risk of developing PF-ILD the INBUILD criteria were met in 14.5% (253/1749) of all new non-IPF fILD referrals. The average time from referral to specialist centre to diagnosis of progressive phenotype was 311 days. Of the progression events the majority were driven by a measured drop in FVC, with more than half of patients experiencing a drop of 10%. Almost one quarter of patients (24.1%) were diagnosed with progressive disease on the basis of radiological and symptomatic progression alone without a spirometric deterioration.This study represents a fair and balanced approach to assessing the incidence of objectively measurable and treatable PF-ILDs in the UK. A rate of 14.5% of new referrals with non-IPF ILD is less than that reported in previous studies however our methodology is likely to give a more accurate result than estimates based on extrapolation from general disease statistics, from physician-reported estimates prone to significant biases, or insurance claim processes also substantially prone to bias. This information has implication for workforce planning and the funding of anti-fibrotic therapy in the UK and beyond.


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-39
Author(s):  
Nannapat Trisiripanit ◽  
Soraya Suntornsawat ◽  
Worapan Phonkaew

Diffuse interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) include more than hundreds of diseases which have different causes or underlying, target groups, signs and symptoms, clinical courses, radiographic appearances, treatments, and prognosis. Among them, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is the most fatal, with prognosis worse than many cancers. After decades of no specific treatment, new medications that may help slow the progression of the fibrosis have been introduced and approved in some countries.  Similar to corticosteroid, anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive drugs which are used to treat some ILDs; these antifibrotic medications could cause certain side effects. In contrast, the cost of treatment is much higher. To monitor ILDs in terms of incidence, demographic and geographic distributions, and life expectancy;  T.S.T. is developing a national ILD database. To ensure that this data base will provide the most accurate information, diagnosis should be as much precise as possible. However, the diagnoses of most ILDs are multidisciplinary. With the facts that surgical lung biopsies are available in patients fewer than 20% in most countries1, HRCT plays important role in showing disease characters and extension. Certain HRCT patterns are accepted to replace surgical lung biopsies (SLB) in some diseases. Unfortunately typical diagnostic HRCT patterns to replace SLB are not possible in all cases; for example, only about half of usual interstitial pneumonia2. Initially, diagnosis could not be made in some cases whose HRCT patterns are not specific and other clinical information is not sufficient. Longitudinal study by following up HRCTs and adding subsequently exhibited clinical data, or even surgical lung biopsy, could eventually establish the diagnosis.  These patients need a system that provide regular clinical and HRCT follow up, also the multidisciplinary team to evaluate those newly acquired clinical and radiographic information . As an important role in managing patients with ILDs, standard HRCT is required to ensure that the initial examination will provide sufficient radiographic information, both the initial and follow-up examinations could be compared,  the interpretation of all examinations is reproducible, and it could be performed in most institutes. To develop national standard HRCT protocol; current situation of interstitial lung diseases in Thailand,the purpose to develop the protocol, and a probable draft of the standard protocol (made by the committee from RCRT) were presented to a panel consisted of thoracic radiologist experts from all parts of Thailand in a meeting held on 11 January 2019 by Foundation of Orphan and Rare Lung Disease (FORD) and Imaging Academic Outreach Center (iAOC).  Knowledge sharing, benefits and disadvantages of the drafted protocol were discussed. Adjustment was done based on feasibility, coverage of all lung diseases, diagnostic accuracy, and radiation safety. The panel provided a standard protocol describing scan coverage, technique, collimation, rotation time, pitch, radiation dose, and reconstruction images. The standard protocol recommends a mandatory acquisition for the first HRCT and optional or additional ones for the follow-up or particular cases.


Author(s):  
Laszlo Vaszar ◽  
Brandon Larsen ◽  
Jay Ryu ◽  
Lewis Wesselius ◽  
Karen Swanson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document