FAMILY HISTORY AND QUALITY OF LIFE CAN BE PREDICTORS FOR MILDER PRIMARY ANTIBODY DEFICIENCY DISEASE (PAD)

Author(s):  
Esther de Vries
2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 844-852 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Titman ◽  
Z. Allwood ◽  
C. Gilmour ◽  
C. Malcolmson ◽  
C. Duran-Persson ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annika Klungland Berg ◽  
Trond H. Diseth ◽  
Tore Gunnar Abrahamsen ◽  
Kathleen Halvorsen ◽  
Trude Reinfjell ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 61 (9) ◽  
pp. 994-1000 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Herriot ◽  
W A C Sewell

Antibody deficiencies may arise as primary disorders or secondary to a variety of diseases, drugs and other environmental/iatrogenic factors. Significant primary antibody deficiencies are relatively rare but, collectively, account for the majority of primary immunodeficiency syndromes encountered in clinical practice. The genetic basis of a number of primary deficiencies has been clarified, although there is considerable genotype/phenotype heterogeneity and the role of gene/environment interactions has yet to be fully elucidated. Primary antibody deficiency can present at any age. The hallmark clinical presentation is recurrent bacterial infection, but these disorders are also associated with a wide variety of other infectious and non-infectious complications and with a high incidence of chronic, structural tissue damage, particularly in the respiratory tract. Clinical recognition of primary antibody deficiency is frequently delayed with consequent increased morbidity, diminished quality of life and early mortality. Clinical laboratories can contribute to improved and timely detection through awareness of routine test results which may be overtly or indirectly suggestive of antibody deficiency. Secondary deficiency is associated with increased awareness, better recognition and earlier diagnosis than in primary disorders. Early liaison and referral of patients with suspected antibody deficiency for specialist opinion and prompt, appropriate therapy is central to the achievement of good clinical outcomes.


2018 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle S. Page ◽  
Bert Hayslip ◽  
Dee Wadsworth ◽  
Philip A. Allen

Persons with and without a family history of dementia report concerns for developing this syndrome; yet, less is known about the specific aspects of dementia that are feared. The Fear of Dementia (FOD) scale was created to assess these concerns. This study examined the psychometric properties of the FOD scale using a sample of middle-aged and older adults ( N = 734). We then explored the factor structure of the scale 2 years later using a smaller sample from the first study ( N = 226). Three factors emerged, highlighting several main areas of concern: Burden and Loss, Quality of Life, and Perceived Social and Cognitive Loss. Preliminary data suggest that the FOD scale is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing the multidimensional nature of the concern about developing dementia. Attention to what specifically is feared may help further our understanding of health behaviors, coping, and targeted supports.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document