ORGANISATION AND FUNCTION OF THE PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX IN CHRONIC PAIN: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Author(s):  
Wei-Ju Chang
2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 341-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-Ju Chang ◽  
Neil E. O'Connell ◽  
Paula R. Beckenkamp ◽  
Ghufran Alhassani ◽  
Matthew B. Liston ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (11) ◽  
pp. e008540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-Ju Chang ◽  
Neil E O'Connell ◽  
Emma Burns ◽  
Lucy S Chipchase ◽  
Matthew B Liston ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nahian Chowdhury ◽  
Wei-Ju Chang ◽  
Samantha K Millard ◽  
Patrick Skippen ◽  
Katarzyna Bilska ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: The primary motor cortex (M1) is a key brain region implicated in pain processing. Here, we present a protocol for a review that aims to synthesise and critically appraise the evidence for the effect of experimentalpain on M1 function. Methods/Analysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis will be conducted. Electronic databases will be searched using a predetermined strategy. Studies published before April 2020 that investigate the effects of experimentally induced pain on corticomotor excitability (CME) in healthy individuals will be included if they meet eligibility criteria. Study identification, data extraction andrisk of bias assessment will be conducted by two independent reviewers, with a third reviewer consulted for any disagreements. The primary outcomes will include group level changes in CME and intracortical, transcortical and sensorimotor modulators of CME. A separate analysis using individual data will also be conducted to explore individual differences in CME in response to experimental pain. The meta-analysis will consider the following factors: pain model (transient, tonic, transitional pain), type of painful tissue (cutaneous, musculoskeletal), time points of outcome measures(during or after recovery from pain) and localisation of pain(target area, control area). Discussion: This review will provide a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms within M1 that mediate experimentally induced pain, both on a group and individual level. Registration Number: The systematic review is registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (#CRD42020173172)


Neurology ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
pp. 577-577 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. J. Alappat ◽  
S. Zaghi ◽  
M. C. Lima ◽  
F. Fregni

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 1270-1288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flavia Di Pietro ◽  
James H. McAuley ◽  
Luke Parkitny ◽  
Martin Lotze ◽  
Benedict M. Wand ◽  
...  

Neurology ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 72 (23) ◽  
pp. 2055-2056
Author(s):  
W. M. Landau ◽  
W. T. Thach ◽  
F. Fregni ◽  
M. C. Lima

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Pellegrini ◽  
Maryam Zoghi ◽  
Shapour Jaberzadeh

AbstractNoninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) modifies corticospinal excitability (CSE) historically in a predictable manner dependent on stimulation parameters. Researchers, however, discuss high degrees of variability between individuals, either responding as expected or not responding as expected. The explanation for this interindividual variability remains unknown with suggested interplay between stimulation parameters and variations in biological, anatomical, and physiological factors. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effect of variation in inherent factors within an individual (biological and anatomical factors) on CSE in response to NIBS of the primary motor cortex. Twenty-two studies were included investigating genetic variation (n=7), age variation (n=4), gender variation (n=7), and anatomical variation (n=5). The results indicate that variation in brain-derived neurotrophic factor genotypes may have an effect on CSE after NIBS. Variation between younger and older adults also affects CSE after NIBS. Variation between age-matched males and females does not affect CSE after NIBS, but variation across the menstrual cycle does. Variation between skull thickness and brain tissue morphology influences the electric field magnitude that ultimately reaches the primary motor cortex. These findings indicate that biological and anatomical variations may in part account for interindividual variability in CSE in response to NIBS of the primary motor cortex, categorizing individuals as responding as expected (responders) or not responding as expected (nonresponders).


Pain ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 161 (9) ◽  
pp. 1955-1975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Giannoni-Luza ◽  
Kevin Pacheco-Barrios ◽  
Alejandra Cardenas-Rojas ◽  
Piero F. Mejia-Pando ◽  
Maria A. Luna-Cuadros ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document