Concha bullosa mucocele - endoscopic surgical solution

ORL ro ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-62
Author(s):  
Andreea Nicoleta Costache ◽  
C. Ioniţă ◽  
Alexandra Guligă ◽  
A. Panfiloiu ◽  
Tatiana  Decuseară ◽  
...  

Headache is a borderline pathology, faced by physicians of various specialties, which has to be thoroughly investigated to establish the etiology and appropriate treatment. The authors present a case of concha bullosa mucocele managed by endoscopic sinus surgery. The mucocele was responsible for persistent nonsystemized headache and also for the chronic rhinosinusitis of the maxillary, ethmoidal and frontal sinus because of the blockage of the middle meatus. The drainage of the anterior sinuses and the mucocele of the concha bullosa were successfully managed by endoscopic sinus surgery.   

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-100
Author(s):  
Ryan H. Belcher ◽  
Allison K. Ikeda ◽  
John M. DelGaudio

Background Endoscopic sinus surgery is performed for many reasons, most commonly for chronic rhinosinusitis refractory to medical treatment. A paradoxical middle turbinate is an anatomic variant that can hinder endoscopic access to the sinuses. No publication has addressed how to surgically treat a paradoxical middle turbinate. Method We present a basic endoscopic surgical approach to conservatively resect a paradoxical middle turbinate in order to improve access to the middle meatus and the sinuses while preserving support and function. Conclusion Conservative remodeling of the paradoxical middle turbinate can provide access to the sinuses while maintaining a significant portion of the middle turbinate.


2019 ◽  
Vol 133 (8) ◽  
pp. 678-684 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Tsuzuki ◽  
K Hashimoto ◽  
K Okazaki ◽  
H Nishikawa ◽  
M Sakagami

AbstractObjectiveThis study aimed to determine the predictors of disease progression after functional endoscopic sinus surgery in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.MethodA total of 281 adult chronic rhinosinusitis patients who underwent primary bilateral functional endoscopic sinus surgery between 2007 and 2017 and had at least 12 months of follow-up endoscopic evaluation were examined. Patients were divided into eosinophilic (n= 205) and non-eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis groups (n= 76). In order to determine adverse factors, post-operative endoscopic appearance scores were analysed in relation to the pre- and intra-operative findings using multiple regression analyses.ResultsThe post-operative course of eosinophilic cases deteriorated over time, like the early period for non-eosinophilic cases. Frontal sinus polyps recurred early in eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis. Multivariate analyses indicated young adulthood, asthma, high computed tomography score and frontal sinus polyps as significant adverse predictors.ConclusionEarly, appropriate estimation of sinonasal conditions appears to be crucial for successful surgical management of chronic rhinosinusitis.


2000 ◽  
Vol 114 (3) ◽  
pp. 205-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. J. Woolford ◽  
N. S. Jones

A concha bullosa may require surgical reduction to facilitate access to the middle meatus during endoscopic sinus surgery. Here we describe an original instrument which enables this procedure to be performed simply with minimal mucosal damage.


Author(s):  
Nadim Saydy ◽  
Sami P. Moubayed ◽  
Marie Bussières ◽  
Arif Janjua ◽  
Shaun Kilty ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives Many experts feel that in the absence of well-defined goals for success, they have an easier time identifying failure. As success ought to not be defined only by absence of failure, we aimed to define optimal outcomes for endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) by obtaining expert surgeon perspectives. Methods A total of 12 surgeons participated in this targeted consultation. Face to face semi-structured interviews were performed with expert surgeons in the field of CRS and ESS. General impressions and personal definitions of acceptable operative success and optimal operative outcomes were compiled and summarized. Results According to an expert survey, patients’ main objectives are an improvement in their chief complain, a general improvement in quality of life (QoL), and a better overall symptomatic control. The most important aspects of endoscopy for defining a successful intervention were an adequate mucus circulation, a healthy mucosa, minimal edema, and patency of all explored cavities or ostia. In the assessment of surgical outcomes, it was determined that both objective and patient reported data must be carefully examined, with more attention given to subjective outcomes. Conclusions According to data gathered from a Canadian expert consultation, a definition of success must be based on both subjective data and nasal endoscopy. We propose to define an acceptable outcome as either a subjective improvement of at least the minimal clinically improvement difference of a validated patient reported outcome questionnaire, along with a satisfactory endoscopic result (1) or a complete subjective resolution with a sub-optimal endoscopy (2). Graphical abstract


Author(s):  
Fatemeh Hajimohamadi ◽  
Jawad Hosseini ◽  
Farrokh Heidari ◽  
Sepideh Alvandi ◽  
Shahin Bastaninezhad ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 141 (4) ◽  
pp. 392-396
Author(s):  
Xuemei Qin ◽  
Qing Sun ◽  
Guohui Chen ◽  
Jian Liu ◽  
Tianle Gao ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 139 (6) ◽  
pp. 529-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandar Perić ◽  
Sandra Vezmar Kovačević ◽  
Aleksandra Barać ◽  
Dejan Gaćeša ◽  
Aneta V. Perić ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 121 (12) ◽  
pp. 2684-2701 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Stankiewicz ◽  
Devyani Lal ◽  
Matthew Connor ◽  
Kevin Welch

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document