Public policy of GST in India: A study on pharmaceutical sector with special reference to Healthcare

India's greatest duty move is now a reality. 1999 was the year when GST was thought of. The amending bill for the full-powered launch of GST was approved by the Rajya Sabha on 8 August 2016, and it was enacted in late August. It is essential to comprehend that GST isn't a duty concession scheme where every good and service has become way cheaper just because the administration has decreased the duty rates. The single Revenue Neutral Rate (RNR) was a difficult system to manage, and thus the Indian govt. I wanted to fix it. Nonetheless, because of practical reasons, "four GST slabs have been set at 5%, 12%, 18%, and 28%. Precious metals have a special rate. The rate of 18% would anyway be relevant for most goods. GST was enacted on 1 July 2017."

Download Full-text

Establishing Public Policy as a Brand with Special Reference to RSBY

MERI-Journal of Management & IT ◽

10.25089//meri/2018/v11/i2/173963 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 11 (2) ◽

pp. 52

Author(s):

Deepshikha Kalra ◽

Vinod Kumar Bishnoi

Keyword(s):

Public Policy ◽

Special Reference

Download Full-text

Telematics, public policy, and economic development with special reference to Brazilian protectionism

The Information Society ◽

10.1080/01972243.1986.9960029 ◽

1986 ◽

Vol 4 (3) ◽

pp. 187-203

Author(s):

Ralph Edfelt

Keyword(s):

Public Policy ◽

Economic Development ◽

Special Reference

Download Full-text

Innovation Incentives in the Pharmaceutical Sector: Re-thinking Competition and Public Policy?

SSRN Electronic Journal ◽

10.2139/ssrn.3845568 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Frank P. Maier-Rigaud ◽

Robert Lauer ◽

Laura Robles

Keyword(s):

Public Policy ◽

Pharmaceutical Sector ◽

Innovation Incentives

Download Full-text

Applied Ethics: What is Applied to What?

Utilitas ◽

10.1017/s0953820800002740 ◽

2000 ◽

Vol 12 (2) ◽

pp. 119-136 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Richard Norman

Keyword(s):

Public Policy ◽

Applied Ethics ◽

Practical Reasons ◽

Top Down ◽

Inside Out

This paper criticizes the conception of applied ethics as the top-down application of a theory to practical issues. It is argued that a theory such as utilitarianism cannot override our intuitive moral perceptions. We cannot be radically mistaken about the kinds of considerations which count as practical reasons, and it is the task of theoretical ethics to articulate the basic kinds of considerations which we appeal to in practical discussions. Dworkin's model of doing ethics ‘from the inside out’ is used to illustrate the appropriate role for theory in a broader sense. In conclusion, some sceptical questions are raised about how far theoretical ethics can contribute to public policy, especially if this requires a consensus.

Download Full-text