scholarly journals Drug – Drug Interactions Between Newer Anti- Retroviral Drugs And Anti Epileptics - A Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 2963-2967
Author(s):  
Vaishnavi S ◽  
Balaji S ◽  
Ramesh M ◽  
Mothi S N ◽  
Swamy V H T ◽  
...  

Drug – Drug Interactions (DDIs) are the leading cause of drug toxicity and emergence of drug resistance, ultimately leading to increased burden in People Living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (PLHIV). On an average 55 % of people on Anti Retroviral Therapy (ARVs) are co-administered with Anti Epileptic Drugs (AEDs). The introduction of newer anti-retroviral drugs such as dolutegravir, bictegravir, emtricitabine, doravirine are proven to have less side effects, high tolerability and effective decrease in the viral load, but the risk of DDIs still stands to be high. This review briefly describes about the pharmacokinetic properties of dolutegravir, bictegravir, emtricitabine, doravirine, mechanism of interaction between the above mentioned ARVs and AEDs, effect of DDIs on ARVs, effect of DDIs on interacting AEDs, outcome of DDIs and possible management of DDIs. The pharmacokinetic type of DDIs was observed between the ARVs and AEDs. The majority of DDIs were found affecting the metabolism and the absorption of the drugs. UGT1A1, CYP 3A are the two important classes of metabolic enzymes involved in the DDIs and p- glycoprotein (P-gp) is the transporter involved in the DDIs affecting the absorption. Significant interactions have been found in between the above mentioned newer ARV’s with carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, phenytoin and phenobarbitol.

2017 ◽  
Vol 216 (suppl_9) ◽  
pp. S824-S828 ◽  
Author(s):  
Horacio A Duarte ◽  
Nuttada Panpradist ◽  
Ingrid A Beck ◽  
Barry Lutz ◽  
James Lai ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 216 (suppl_9) ◽  
pp. S816-S819
Author(s):  
Catherine Godfrey ◽  
Marina Bobkova ◽  
Charles Boucher ◽  
Giovanni Ravasi ◽  
Ping Chen ◽  
...  

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 97 (6) ◽  
pp. 886-890
Author(s):  
Mark W. Kline ◽  
Courtney V. Fletcher ◽  
Marianne E. Federici ◽  
Alice T. Harris ◽  
Kim D. Evans ◽  
...  

Objectives. To obtain preliminary information on the pharmacokinetic properties, tolerance, safety, and antiviral activity of combination therapy with stavudine and didanosine in children with advanced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Methods. Eight children (median age, 6.6 years; range, 2.8 to 12 years) with advanced HIV disease (median CD4+ lymphocyte count at baseline, 42 cells/µL; range, 8 to 553 cells/µL) were treated with stavudine (2 mg/kg per day in two divided doses) and didanosine (180 mg/m2 per day in two divided doses) for 24 weeks. Seven children had histories of prior zidovudine therapy. All children had received stavudine alone for 19 to 33 months before the addition of didanosine to the treatment regimen. Children were assessed clinically and with laboratory studies at baseline, weekly through week 4 of combination therapy, and every 4 weeks thereafter. Results. Analysis of stavudine and didanosine plasma half-life values, clearances, and area under the plasma concentration-versus-time curves revealed no obvious clinical pharmacokinetic interaction between the drugs through study week 12. Combination therapy was well tolerated, and there were no drug-associated clinical or laboratory adverse events. Signs and symptoms of peripheral neuropathy were not observed. All three children with baseline CD4+ lymphocyte counts greater than 50 cells/µL had greater than 20% increases in their counts within the first 12 weeks of therapy; CD4+ lymphocyte count increases were not observed in the other children. Plasma HIV RNA concentrations showed median declines of 0.88 log10 (range, -3.41 log10 to 0.31 log10) and 0.30 log10 (range, -0.63 log10 to 0.89 log10) at study weeks 12 and 24, respectively. Conclusions. Combination therapy with stavudine and didanosine was well tolerated and safe in this small group of children with advanced HIV disease. Plasma HIV RNA concentration declines suggest a favorable effect of therapy on virus load. These findings should be confirmed, and the regimen's clinical efficacy should be examined, in controlled studies of HIV-infected children with less-advanced disease.


Author(s):  
Ifeyinwa Chijioke-Nwauche ◽  
Mary C Oguike ◽  
Chijioke A Nwauche ◽  
Khalid B Beshir ◽  
Colin J Sutherland

Abstract Background In Nigeria, indiscriminate use of antimalarial drugs may contribute to the threat of drug resistance, but this has not been evaluated among people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Methods HIV-positive adults attending a university hospital HIV clinic and HIV-negative adult volunteers from the university hospital community with a positive blood film were treated with artemether–lumefantrine. Parasite DNA from before and after treatment was polymerase chain reaction amplified to identify molecular markers of drug susceptibility. Results The pfcrt76T genotype was prevalent among both HIV-positive and HIV-negative participants (78.6% and 68.2%, respectively). Three new mutations in the pfmdr1 gene—F73S, S97L and G165R—and the uncommon pfdhps S436F variant were detected, whereas pfdhps K540E and pfdhfr I164L were absent. The A437G allele of pfdhps predominated (62/66 [94%]). The I431 V mutation was found in 19 of 66 pretreatment pfdhps sequences (28.8%). The pfmdr1 86N allele was significantly more common at day 3 post-treatment than at baseline (odds ratio 8.77 [95% confidence interval 1.21 to 380]). Conclusions We found evidence of continued chloroquine use among HIV-positive individuals. Selection for the pfmdr1 86N after artemether–lumefantrine treatment was observed, indicating a possible threat to antimalarial efficacy in the study area. The complexity of pfdhps haplotypes emphasises the need for careful monitoring of anti-folate susceptibility in Nigeria.


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 253.e1-253.e4 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Stecher ◽  
A. Chaillon ◽  
A.M. Eis-Hübinger ◽  
C. Lehmann ◽  
G. Fätkenheuer ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
pp. 1112-1118 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. K. Sethi ◽  
D. D. Celentano ◽  
S. J. Gange ◽  
R. D. Moore ◽  
J. E. Gallant

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document