scholarly journals CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS, PROTOCOL TO THE CONVENTION AND THE CASE-LAW OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS AS A SOURCES OF SUFFRAGE IN UKRAINE

2020 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Political Development ◽  
Electoral System ◽  
Case Law ◽  
The State ◽  
Free Expression ◽  
European Court ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
Fundamental Freedoms ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights

The article is devoted to the study of such sources of electoral law in Ukraine as the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the first Protocol to the Convention and the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. The legal nature of these international sources of suffrage in Ukraine is considered. Attention is drawn to the peculiarities of the wording of the right to free election in Article 3 the first Protocol to the Convention. The peculiarities of the application of the above article by the European Court of Human Rights are disclosed. The importance the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights as a source of suffrage in Ukraine is emphasized. This assertion is justified by the fact that the rules of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and its Protocols are of a general and abstract nature and are interpreted and filled with real meaning in judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, which are of precedent nature. A number of legal positions of the European Court of Human Rights concerning the obligation of the state to organize and hold democratic elections, enshrined in the specific decisions of this international judicial institution, have been analyzed. In the article were covered such legal positions as: the possibility of limiting the suffrage of citizens, provided that such conditions do not interfere with the free expression of the people's opinion on the election of the legislative body; evaluation of the electoral legislation in the light of the political development of the country, taking into account national characteristics; wide discretion of the state in the choice of the electoral system, which will ensure the free expression of the opinion of the people, etc. There are a number of unresolved issues regarding the application of the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights in judicial and administrative practice in Ukraine, one of which is the possible conflict between the case-law of the Court and the rules of Ukrainian law. It is proposed to resolve this conflict at the legislative level. The conclusions focus on the peculiarities of the legal nature of these sources of suffrage in Ukraine. KEY WORDS: sources of suffrage, Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, case-law of the European Court of Human Rights, right to free elections.

scholarly journals PROTECTION OF PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THE CASE LAW OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (6(75)) ◽  
pp. 52-59
Author(s):  
Taisa Tomlyak
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Case Law ◽  
The State ◽  
European Court ◽  
Fundamental Freedoms ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
Proportional Relationship ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Broad Understanding

The article considers the legal positions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter - Сourt). In particular, the decision of the Сourt in cases of legality of interference with property rights was examined in the light of the provisions of Protocol № 1 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter Protocol №1 to the Convention). Also, the article specifies the principles that, in the opinion of the Сourt, the state must adhere to when interfering in property rights. In addition, it is established that the concept of "property" within the meaning of Part 1 of Art. 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention has an independent meaning. That is, this concept cannot depend on its legal classification in national law and cannot be limited to ownership of things. Also, we considered a broad understanding in the practice of the Сourt "interests of society" in the application of measures of deprivation of property rights and ensuring a proportional relationship between the goal and the means used. In addition, the relationship between Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 and other articles of the Convention is considered, as issues arising in connection with the use of one's "property" may also relate to other articles of the Convention. Some decisions of the Court of Human Rights and its interpretation of the concepts of "property", "property" and "property rights" are analyzed.

scholarly journals Od predmeta Mccann do predmeta F.J.M.

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-132
Author(s):  
Gabrijela Mihelčić ◽  
Maša Marochini Zrinski ◽  
Renata Šantek
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Case Law ◽  
The State ◽  
European Convention ◽  
European Court ◽  
Fundamental Freedoms ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
Proportionality Test ◽  
The Right ◽  
Analyse Case

The authors discuss and analyse case law of the European Court of Human Rights regarding the right to respect for home under Article 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and with respect the issue of proportionality. In the paper, the proportionality category was viewed as a criterion for securing protection and as a material precondition for deciding whether the State party's interference with the right to respect for home was proportionate. The cases in which the applicant's eviction occurred after national proceedings for the enforcement of mortgages were addressed. In this context, the genesis of the proportionality category was analysed, from the cases where the Court found it necessary to examine the proportionality to the cases where the Court did not consider the proportionality test necessary.

Prohibition of discrimination: concepts, features and obligations of the state according to the Convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darina Kosinova ◽  
Arsenii Paliiuk
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
The State ◽  
Equal Treatment ◽  
General Level ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
European Court ◽  
Fundamental Freedoms ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights

Problem setting. Because of the transformational processes in socio-political life, the problems of ensuring equal treatment of equals and different – to persons who have other, characteristic of certain groups of people, characteristics are becoming increasingly important. Analysis of resent researches and publication. Such scholars as O. Vasylchenko, O. Vashanova, D. Hudyma, N. Dryomina-Volok, B. Nedelek, N. Onishchenko, O. Pankevych devoted their works to the issue of the principles of equality and non-discrimination, in particular in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights. Target of research. The purpose of this work is to carry out a comparative legal analysis of the scope of the two concepts, namely the “prohibition of discrimination” provided for in Art. 14 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the “General Prohibition of Discrimination”, which is enshrined in Art. 1 of Protocol № 12 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. An additional purpose of this paper is to present ways to overcome the problem of discrimination in Ukrainian society and the problems of legal regulation of discrimination prevention. Article’s main body. Publication is devoted to the analysis of the prohibition of discrimination under Art. 14 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and Art. 1 of Protocol № 12 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. International legal acts, which enshrine the provisions on the prohibition of discrimination, have been studied. A comparative legal analysis of the “prohibition of discrimination” and the “general prohibition of discrimination” was made. The author also draws attention to the problems of applying the provisions on non-discrimination in practice. The publication provides a thorough analysis of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. The characteristic features inherent in the concept of discrimination are indicated in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights. Positive, negative and procedural responsibilities for prohibiting and combating discrimination are disclosed. In this article investigated the positive duty of the state as ensuring “application of different law in different circumstances”. Regarding negative obligations, the very construction of the prohibition of discrimination implies that states refrain from any unjustified discriminatory treatment in their legislative and law enforcement activities. As for procedural obligations, states should effectively investigate such cases in the event of discrimination. Conclusions and prospects for the development. The construction of the prohibition of discrimination presupposes a certain set of characteristics characteristic only of it. The scope of the general prohibition of discrimination has been significantly increased since Protocol No. 12 was opened for signature by the member states of the Council of Europe. Given that the ECHR is a “living document”, the indicative list of protected features of non-discrimination is being expanded by the case law of the ECtHR. Unfortunately, the general level of tolerance, including that of public authorities, leaves much to be desired.

PROBLEMATIC ASPECTS OF ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN UKRAINE

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariia Shvartseva ◽  
◽  
Anna Plotnikova ◽  
Kateryna Dubyna ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
The State ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Council Of Europe ◽  
European Court ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
Fundamental Freedoms ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
Systemic Problems ◽  
Legislative Changes

The article is devoted to the study of problematic aspects of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter — the ECHR) execution decisions in Ukraine. The work clarifies the causes and systemic problems due to which Ukraine does not comply with the decisions of the ECHR. The relevant provisions of international and national legislation acts have been analyzed: the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as the Convention), Protocols No. 1 and No. 14 to the Convention, the Law of Ukraine (hereinafter referred to as the LU) "On the Execution of Decisions and Application of the European Court Practice of Rights person", Law of Ukraine" On enforcement proceedings "," On state guarantees regarding the execution of court decisions ", Resolutions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 440, No. 703. On the example of the case «Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy», it was shown that the state must comply with the final decisions in which it is a party. This performance should not be limited to compensation for damage caused, but should also include the adoption of general measures and individual nature to correct problems. The work outlined the place of the Committee of Ministers of the Europe Council in the process of execution by states of final decisions regarding them. It was noted that the execution of final decisions is carried out under the control of the Ministers Committee. The resolution “Enforcement of judgments of the European Court of Human Affairs” adopted by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, according to which the violating state can be punished for improper execution of the decisions of the ECHR, in particular with regard to the introduction of legislative changes, was analyzed. The strictest of these penalties is the expulsion of the country from the Council of Europe, which once again underlines the importance of this issue. The article examined the legal nature of "pilot decisions", their difference from ordinary decisions. It was found that the purpose of making “pilot decisions” is to identify systemic problems of the state and help in solving them. The paper provides a list of systemic problems that arose in the practice of the ECHR in cases against Ukraine. On the example of two “pilot decisions”, “Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov v. Ukraine” and “Burmych and others v. Ukraine”, specific systemic problems are considered, the ways in which Ukraine tried to overcome them are analyzed. The work contains the reasons that lead to the Ukraine failure to comply with court decisions. These factors are broken down into 3 groups: legal, financial and institutional. The authors propose ways to solve these problems.

scholarly journals Supervision of the execution of The European Court of Human Rights’ case law

2021 ◽  
pp. 33-36
Author(s):  
Corina Siman ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Fundamental Rights ◽  
The Political ◽  
Council Of Europe ◽  
European Court ◽  
Fundamental Freedoms ◽  
European System ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
Executive Body

The Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms empowers the decision-making and executive body of the Council of Europe, id est the Committee of Ministers, to supervise the execution of the European Court of Human Rights’ case law. The mechanism thus established possesses a certain specificity, which is inherent to the European system of protection of fundamental rights. Therefore, both the political nature of the Committee of Ministers and the elements that form the process of monitoring the implementation of the content of the Strasbourg Court’s judgments and decisions are of interest.

scholarly journals Torture as a ground for inadmissibility of evidence

2021 ◽  
pp. 28-31
Author(s):  
Maryna HRYTSENKO
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
The State ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Legal Systems ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
National Courts ◽  
European Court ◽  
Fundamental Freedoms ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights

The European Court of Human Rights, which focuses on the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, points to the importance of the prohibition of torture. The Court has formed its position based on the importance of Article 3 of the Convention and, consequently, the inadmissibility of the evidence obtained in violation of that article by the prosecution. This paper analyzes the practice of the European Court of Human Rights on the implementation of evidence-based activities in national legal systems, and in particular examines the requirements of the Court on the admissibility of evidence-based exercise and activity obtained in the course of work results. The paper demonstrates the ECHR's practice on the issue of torture in obtaining evidence and the consequences of using such a «method», its significance for the practice of national courts and the modernization of the position of courts in relation to the dynamics of this issue. As a result, problematic areas of Ukrainian legislation and justice were identified. The reasons for the use of torture by the authorities and the safeguards introduced by Ukraine to combat the use of such inhuman treatment by the authorities were identified. Changes in the opinion of the European Court of Human Rights on this issue and its significance for Ukraine are analyzed. The possibilities of application of the ECHR for evaluation of admissibility of evidence in criminal proceedings in Ukraine are examined. The patterns characterizing the legal positions of the ECHR in assessing the admissibility of evidence are discovered and singled out. Ukraine should take into account that the responsibilities of the state, in addition to refraining from the use of torture to obtain evidence, include the protection of people from these encroachments by third parties.

scholarly journals The Reopening of Proceedings After the Judgment of the ECtHR in Cases Against Lithuania

Teisė ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 113 ◽  
pp. 27-49
Author(s):  
Nika Bruskina
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Case Law ◽  
European Court ◽  
Fundamental Freedoms ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
Administrative Courts ◽  
Administrative Proceedings

The author of this article examines the case law of the Lithuanian courts of general jurisdiction and administrative courts related to the reopening of domestic criminal, civil, or administrative proceedings when the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter – the ECtHR or the Court) finds a violation of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and/or Protocols in the cases against Lithuania.

scholarly journals Reflection of Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights on Impartiality and Independence of National Courts in Context of the Right to a Fair Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-90
Author(s):  
Alla Demyda
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Fair Trial ◽  
National Courts ◽  
European Court ◽  
Fundamental Freedoms ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
Principles Of Justice ◽  
The Right

The article focuses on the principle of impartiality and independence of judiciary as a part of the right to a fair trial according to Article 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. In particular, an account will be taken of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights in matters of applications from national judges. The article considers the reflection of the decision of the European Court of Human Rights on the amendment of national legislations and the amendment of the provisions of the national constitutions regarding the principles of justice.

scholarly journals Study of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights in criminal law matters

2007 ◽  
Vol 79 (9) ◽  
pp. 371-395
Author(s):  
Momčilo Grubač
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Inadmissible Evidence ◽  
European Court ◽  
Ne Bis In Idem ◽  
Fundamental Freedoms ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
Case Files ◽  
The Right

This study includes certain number of decisions of the European Court of Human Rights that relate to the criminal procedural matters, primarily those constituting the right to a fair trial provided in Article 6 of the Convention for Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. These decisions were analyzed and interpreted in order to establish the practice of the Court in these procedural matters and to enable us to evaluate whether domestic criminal procedural law and its application are in line with this practice. The author dealt with the issues of prohibition to institute legal action twice for the same cause of action (ne bis in idem), immunities and privileges, right to court access, exclusion of inadmissible evidence from the criminal case files, right to the impartial court and right of defense to call and interrogate witnesses.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document