Comprehensive report: engineering controls for post-operatory waste anesthetic gases - baseline data collection.

2013 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. 5661-5672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Duguid ◽  
Robert Butsch ◽  
J. William Carey ◽  
Michael Celia ◽  
Nikita Chugunov ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Narelle Campbell ◽  
Annie Farthing ◽  
Susan Witt ◽  
Jessie Anderson ◽  
Susan Lenthall ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND The successful recruitment and retention of health professionals to rural and remote areas of Australia is a health policy priority. Student undergraduate or graduate entry nursing or allied health learning placements in the Northern Territory of Australia (most of which is considered remote) may influence rural or remote work location decisions. OBJECTIVE The aim of the study is to determine where allied health professionals and nurses who have had a student placement/s in the Northern Territory of Australia end up practising. METHODS This research is an observational cohort study with a baseline data collection and then repeated annual data collection over 10 years (2017/18-2029). The baseline data collection is a demographic profile of allied health and nursing students and their evaluation of their NT placement using a nationally consistent questionnaire. Annual Work Location Surveys will track work location and the influences on work location decisions. RESULTS This study will generate unique data on the remote and rural work locations of nursing and allied health professional students who had a placement in the Northern Territory of Australia. It will be able to determine what are the most important characteristics of those who take up remote and rural employment (even if outside NT), and identify barriers to remote employment. CONCLUSIONS The study will add to the literature on rates of allied health and nursing professionals working in a remote or rural setting following remote or rural learning placements. The results will be of interest to government and remote health workforce planners. CLINICALTRIAL Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number: ACTRN12620000797976


2017 ◽  
pp. 90-116
Author(s):  
Gerry Reddy ◽  
Eddie Smyth ◽  
Michael Steyn

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann Catrine Eldh ◽  
Eva Joelsson-Alm ◽  
Per Wretenberg ◽  
Maria Hälleberg-Nyman

Abstract Background The Onset PrevenTIon of urinary retention in Orthopaedic Nursing and rehabilitation, OPTION, project aims to progress knowledge translation vis-à-vis evidence-based bladder monitoring in orthopaedic care, to decrease the risk of urinary retention, and voiding complications. Urinary retention is common whilst in hospital for hip surgery. If not properly identified and managed, there is a high risk of complications, some lifelong and life threatening. Although evidence-based guidelines are available, the implementation is lagging. Methods Twenty orthopaedic sites are cluster randomised into intervention and control sites, respectively. The intervention sites assemble local facilitator teams among nursing and rehabilitation staff, including first-line managers. The teams receive a 12-month support programme, including face-to-face events and on-demand components to map and bridge barriers to guideline implementation, addressing leadership behaviours and de-implementation of unproductive routines. All sites have access to the guidelines via a public healthcare resource, but the control sites have no implementation support. Baseline data collection includes structured assessments of urinary retention procedures via patient records, comprising incidence and severity of voiding issues and complications, plus interviews with managers and staff, and surveys to all hip surgery patients with interviews across all sites. Further assessments of context include the Alberta Context Tool used with staff, the 4Ps tool for preference-based patient participation used with patients, and data on economic aspects of urinary bladder care. During the implementation intervention, all events are recorded, and the facilitators keep diaries. Post intervention, the equivalent data collections will be repeated twice, and further data will include experiences of the intervention and guideline implementation. Data will be analysed with statistical analyses, including comparisons before and after, and between intervention and control sites. The qualitative data are subjected to content analysis, and mixed methods are applied to inform both clinical outcomes and the process evaluation, corresponding to a hybrid design addressing effectiveness, experiences, and outcomes. Discussion The OPTION trial has a potential to account for barriers and enablers for guideline implementation in the orthopaedic context in general and hip surgery care in particular. Further, it may progress the understanding of implementation leadership by dyads of facilitators and first-line managers. Trial registration The study was registered as NCT04700969 with the U.S. National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry on 8 January 2021, that is, prior to the baseline data collection.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document