scholarly journals SURGICAL INCISION TECHNIQUE APPROACH ON DISTAL FEMUR FRACTURE A LITERATURE REVIEW

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-39
Author(s):  
Rudiansyah Harahap

Distal Femur fractures are rare, with the literature reporting a prevalence of 0.5% of all fractures1. Incidence rates of distal femur fractures have only been reported in a small number of studies2,3. Fractures of the distal femur is described as a classic fragility fracture, with the mean age of patients reported as 67.3 years and the vast majority of fractures (83%) occurring in women1,4.A study shows an incidence of distal femur fractures is 8.7/100,000/year. After the age of 60 years, a rapid increase in the incidence of distal femoral fractures was observed for both genderswith a considerable female predominance5. Nowdays, the surgical management of distal femur fracture is evolving. This review will discuss about the incision approach on distal femur approaches.           

2021 ◽  
pp. 131-137
Author(s):  
Santanu Kar ◽  
Hemant Bansal ◽  
Vijay Sharma ◽  
Kamran Farooque

Fractures of the supracondylar and intercondylar region of the distal femur usually result from high velocity injury that is uncommonly associated with violation of the integrity of the extensor mechanism. The consequences of missed quadriceps injury associated with a distal femur fracture are devastating. The present case report illustrates the importance of recognizing the rare association of quadriceps tear with distal femoral fractures, an appropriate surgical approach to repair the tear as well as fixation of fracture, and a protocol of postoperative rehabilitation to achieve a successful outcome.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Gemayel ◽  
Matthew J. Yousif ◽  
William Padget ◽  
Joseph Finch

Periprosthetic distal femur fractures can be treated nonoperatively, with open reduction and internal fixation or with more constrained prostheses. Distal femoral replacement is typically a last resort treatment option for comminuted periprosthetic or osteoporotic distal femoral fractures in patients with poor bone stock or resistant nonunions. We report the case of a 54-year-old female with a remote history of bone mulch ACL reconstruction who sustained an intraoperative comminuted bicondylar distal femur fracture during a primary total knee arthroplasty. This patient was treated with a distal femoral replacement and successfully returned to her preoperative function.


Author(s):  
Sridhar Reddy Konuganti ◽  
Sreenath Rao Jakinapally ◽  
Vennamaneni Pratish Rao ◽  
Sivaprasad Rapur

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">Distal femur fractures need to be treated operatively to achieve optimal outcomes. Different types of internal fixation devices have been used but, the number of revisions for non-union, loss of reduction and implant failure has been high.</span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">This prospective study reviewed 20 cases of distal femoral fractures surgically managed with distal femoral locking compression plate between December 2013 and December 2015 at Mediciti Institute of medical sciences, Ghanpur, Medchal, tertiary care referral and trauma centre. Fractures were categorized according to OTA classification by Muller</span>.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">Highest number of patients was in their 3rd decade (25%) 18 out of 20 patients had closed injury. Type A2 Muller’s fracture was the most common fracture type 7 out of 20 patients (35%).The mean follow up period in this study was 8 months. The average range of knee flexion achieved was about 109°. The mean score 81.75 points were rated using Neer’s functional score (Max 100). </span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">The locking compression plate is the treatment of choice in the management of comminuted distal femoral fractures especially Type A fractures where we have found higher Neer scores. It may not completely solve the age-old problems associated with any fracture like non-union and malunion, but is valuable in the management of these fractures.</span></p><p class="Default"> </p>


Author(s):  
Shreekant Meena ◽  
Sanjay Yadav ◽  
M K Yadav ◽  
Suresh Bishnoi

Background: Study of functional outcome of distal femur fractures treated with minimal invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) Methods: Hospital based Prospective intervantional study conducted on 30 Patients in the department of Orthopedics in hospitals attached to S.M.S Medical College and hospital. Results: In our study, 43.33% patients had excellent scoring and 26.67% patients had good results and 30.00% patients had fair result Conclusion: We concluded that three fourth patients functional outcome was excellent/ good. Keywords: Functional outcome, MI-PPO, Femur


Author(s):  
Vishal Singh ◽  
Avinash Gundavarapu ◽  
Tejas Patel ◽  
Alokeshwar Sharma

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background: </strong>Distal femur fractures make up 6 to 7% of all femur fractures. Various plating options for distal femur fracture are conventional buttress plates, fixed-angle devices, and locking plates. This study was planned to evaluate and explore locking compression plate fixation in distal end femur fractures which is expected to provide a stable fixation with minimum exposure, early mobilization, less complications and a better quality of life.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted as prospective clinical study in 20 skeletally mature patients with x-ray evidence of distal femur fracture fulfilling inclusion and exclusion criteria, operated with distal femur LCP plating. Patients were assessed radiologically and classified according to distal femur fracture classification and outcome graded as excellent, good, fair and poor based on Lysholm Knee Score.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 15 excellent outcome cases, 3 cases were type A1 fracture, 1 case had type A3, 2 cases had type B1 and B2 each, 5 cases had type C2 and 2 cases had type C3 fracture. 1 case with good outcome was type C3. 1 case with fair outcome was type B2. While 3 cases with poor outcome were type A1, A2 and C3.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The DF-LCP is an ideal implant to use for fractures of the distal femur. However, accurate positioning and fixation are required to produce satisfactory results. We recommend use of this implant in Type A and C, osteoporotic and periprosthetic fractures.</p>


Author(s):  
Graham J. DeKeyser ◽  
Anne J. Hakim ◽  
Dillon C. O’Neill ◽  
Carsten W. Schlickewei ◽  
Lucas S. Marchand ◽  
...  

Injury ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (8) ◽  
pp. 1732-1736 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gele B. Moloney ◽  
Tiffany Pan ◽  
Carola F. Van Eck ◽  
Devan Patel ◽  
Ivan Tarkin

2011 ◽  
Vol 131 (10) ◽  
pp. 1331-1332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarun Goyal ◽  
Hira L. Nag ◽  
Sujit K. Tripathy

BJS Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
O A Javed ◽  
M J Khan ◽  
Y Abbas ◽  
S Pillai ◽  
K Hristova ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Elderly patients with femoral fractures are often frail and require a multidisciplinary approach to optimise medical care, rehabilitation and prevention of further injury. Previously, neck of femur fracture patients were the focus of such an approach, but NICE and BOAST guidelines emphasise extending this care to other elderly trauma patients. Methods A retrospective analysis of 43 patients over 60 years old at Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust in 2019 with a femoral fracture other than a neck of femur fracture. BOAST guideline standards were surgery within 36 hours, orthogeriatric assessment within 72 hours, a documented ceiling of treatment, falls risk assessment, bone health review, nutritional assessment and physiotherapy review. Results Our study showed worse outcomes in all standards for patients with femoral shaft, distal femur and periprosthetic femur fractures compared to neck of femur fractures: surgery within 36 hours (63.9% vs. 66%); orthogeriatric assessment within 72 hours (32.6% vs. 91.9%); falls risk assessment (76.7% vs. 99.6%); bone health review (41.9% vs. 99.7%); nutritional assessment (55.8% vs. 99.6%); physiotherapy review (97.7% vs. 98.9%). The group also had worse outcomes for average length of stay (19 days vs. 14 days) and 30 day mortality (9.3% vs. 8.6%). Discussion Our study showed a discrepancy in care received by elderly patients with femoral fractures other than neck of femur. We will introduce a proforma for all femoral fractures, present our findings to orthogeriatric, bone health and physiotherapy teams to involve them in the care of such patients and re-audit following these recommendations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document