Corporate Governance and Its Impact on Cost of Capital: Empirical Insights from Indian Listed Firms

GIS Business ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-37
Author(s):  
Showkat Busru Ahmad Busru
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Cost Of Capital ◽  
Empirical Support ◽  
Multiple Regression Model ◽  
Cost Of Debt ◽  
Board Structure ◽  
Governance Mechanism ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Board Characteristics ◽  
Board Monitoring

To perpetuate in stiff competition of corporate race role of corporate governance in creating value for shareholders has got amplified thus has become the subject of intense interest in corporate finance research. The main objective of our study is to examine the effect of corporate governance mechanism on cost of capital in listed Indian firms and to determine vital areas in corporate governance which directly or indirectly contribute towards reducing capital cost of sample Indian listed firms. From sample of 270 NSE listed Indian firms for period of nine years ranging from 2007–08 to 2015–16, using OLS multiple regression model. The empirical support to the understanding that corporate governance reduce firms cost of finance is consistent in Indian weak legal corporate setting also. However, Board characteristics has been found ineffective in causing overall cost of capital and debt and equity as well. Moreover, board characteristics have also failed to significantly affect the cost of debt. Governance effectiveness in reducing cost of capital through board structure, activities and disclosures are supporting the argument that potential investors in equity and debtholders favor monitoring mechanisms that are likely to limit managerial opportunism and consider board monitoring effectiveness as a source of greater assurance and confidence boosting mechanism among suppliers of finance and other stakeholders as well.

Determinants of voluntary formation of risk management committees

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 649-671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nkoko Blessy Sekome ◽  
Tesfaye Taddesse Lemma
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Risk Management ◽  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Emerging Economy ◽  
Board Structure ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Practical Implications

Purpose – The aim of this paper is to examine the nexus between firm-specific attributes and a company’s decision to setup a separate risk management committee (RMC) as a sub-committee of the board within the context of an emerging economy, South Africa. Design/methodology/approach – The authors analyse data extracted from audited annual financial reports of 181 non-financial firms listed on the Johannesburg Securities Exchange (JSE) by using logistic regression technique. Findings – The results show a strong positive relationship between the existence of a separate RMC and board independence, board size, firm size and industry type. However, the authors fail to find support for the hypotheses that independent board chairman, auditor reputation, reporting risk and financial leverage have an influence on a firm’s decision to establish RMC as a separately standing committee in the board structure. The findings signify the role of costs associated with information asymmetry, agency, upkeep of a standalone RMC, damage to the reputation of directors and industry-specific idiosyncrasies on a firm’s decision to form a separate RMC. Research limitations/implications – As in most empirical studies, this study focuses on listed firms. Nonetheless, future studies that focus on non-listed firms could add additional insights to the literature. Investigating the role of firm-specific governance attributes other than those considered in the present study (e.g. gender of directors, ownership structure, etc.) could further enhance the understanding of antecedents of risk-management practices. Practical implications – The findings have practical implications for the investment community in assessing the quality of risk management practices of companies listed on the JSE. Furthermore, the results provide insights that are potentially useful to the King Committee and other corporate governance regulators in South Africa in their effort to improve corporate governance practices. Originality/value – The present study focuses on firms drawn from an emerging economy which has profound economic, institutional, political and cultural differences compared to advanced economies, which have received a disproportionately higher share of attention in prior studies. Thus, the study contributes additional insights to the literature on corporate risk management from the perspective of an emerging economy.

scholarly journals Women Do the Job: The Reasons to Set Quota for Women on Boards

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 167
Author(s):  
Sara De Masi ◽  
Agnieszka Słomka-Gołębiowska ◽  
Andrea Paci
Keyword(s):  
Audit Committee ◽  
Empirical Support ◽  
Board Structure ◽  
Corporate Boards ◽  
Controlling Shareholder ◽  
Female Directors ◽  
Women On Boards ◽  
Board Monitoring ◽  
Women On Corporate Boards ◽  
Family Connection

In 2012 Italy introduced quota to increase the number of women on corporate boards. The aim of our research is to shed more lights on how women on boards, after the enforcement of quota law, improve the board functions and the board structure. Our study focuses on all Italian FTSE MIB companies from 2008 to 2015. Italy is a country where the percentage of female directors was very low before quota. Female directors, when present, were linked through a family connection to the controlling shareholder. Our research demonstrates that a higher percentage of women on boards, after the quota, leads to a higher board members attendance and more board meetings, thus a better board monitoring. We document that, after quota, one more women to the board results in increasing the board involvement in strategy and the independence of audit committee. Our findings provide empirical support on the effectiveness of female directors, suggesting important implications of the quota legislation on the “type” of women elected.

Corporate governance and risk in cross-listed and Canadian only companies

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (10) ◽  
pp. 2740-2757 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atreya Chakraborty ◽  
Lucia Gao ◽  
Shahbaz Sheikh
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Differential Effect ◽  
Composite Index ◽  
Governance Mechanism ◽  
Firm Risk ◽  
Governance Mechanisms ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Corporate Governance Mechanisms ◽  
The Impact

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate if there is a differential effect of corporate governance mechanisms on firm risk in Canadian companies cross-listed on US markets and Canadian companies not cross-listed (Canadian only companies). Design/methodology/approach Using a sample comprised of all Canadian companies included in the S&P/TSX Composite Index for the period 2009–2014, this study applies OLS and fixed effect regressions to investigate the effect of corporate governance mechanisms on firm risk. Interaction variables between governance mechanisms and the cross-listing status are used to examine if this effect is different for cross-listed firms. Findings Results indicate that the effect of board characteristics such as size, independence and proportion of female directors remains the same in both cross-listed and not cross-listed firms. CEO duality and insider equity ownership impact firm risk only in cross-listed companies, while institutional shareholdings, environmental, social and governance disclosure and family control affect firm risk in Canadian only firms. Overall, the empirical results indicate that some governance mechanisms impact firm risk only in firms that cross-list, while others are well-suited for Canadian only firms. Practical implications This study suggests that some of the differences between Canadian companies that cross-list and the Canadian companies that do not cross-list in US stock markets may change the impact of governance mechanisms on firm risk. Therefore, these findings have important implications for the design of governance mechanisms in Canadian firms. Since some of these differences are common to other economies, the conclusions can be extended to companies in other countries with similar governance structures. Originality/value Although previous studies have investigated the effect of governance mechanism on firm risk, this is the first paper that studies the differential effect for companies that cross-list in US markets. Specifically, differences in the ownership structure, firm control and in the regulatory and institutional environment, may explain this differential effect. Unlike most of the previous studies that focus on the effect of individual governance mechanisms, this study uses several mechanisms and their interactions at the same time.

An Overview of Corporate Governance and Innovation in Chinese IT and Manufacturing Listed Firms

2021 ◽  
pp. 338-357
Author(s):  
Xihui Chen
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Institutional Environment ◽  
Research Field ◽  
Manufacturing Industries ◽  
Board Structure ◽  
Current Structure ◽  
Listed Firms

This study introduces the current structure of corporate governance (ownership and board structure) and innovation in Chinese IT and manufacturing listed firms. It highlights the unique features and potential issues of corporate governance and innovation in the Chinese institutional environment. This chapter helps advance the understanding of ownership and board structures, as well as innovation in Chinese IT and manufacturing industries. It is hoped that this study will encourage more research to pursue this interesting research field.

scholarly journals Corporate Governance and Cost of Capital: Evidence from Emerging Market

Risks ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 104
Author(s):  
Muhammad Yar Khan ◽  
Anam Javeed ◽  
Ly Kim Cuong ◽  
Ha Pham
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Lower Cost ◽  
Cost Of Capital ◽  
Emerging Market ◽  
Firm Level ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Corporate Failure ◽  
Governance Index ◽  
Governance Practices ◽  
Code Of Corporate Governance

This study used a researcher self-constructed corporate governance index as a proxy to measure the firm-level corporate governance compliance and disclosure with the 2002 Pakistani Code of Corporate Governance, to examine the relationship between corporate governance and cost of capital. We found a negative and significant association between the Pakistani Corporate Governance Index (PCGI) and block ownership with the firm-level cost of capital. On average, better-governed Pakistani listed firms tend to be associated with a lower cost of capital than their poorly governed counterparts are. As an emerging market, good corporate governance practices are mainly related to minimise corporate failure and assist firms in attracting capital at a lower cost.

Board, ownership and performance of banks with a dual board system: Evidence from Taiwan

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi-Jui Huang
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Empirical Support ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Negative Influence ◽  
Bank Performance ◽  
Board Structure ◽  
Outside Directors ◽  
Industrial Enterprises ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Board System

AbstractThe influence of corporate governance on a firm's performance has recently been studied in industrial enterprises in developed countries, but not in services such as banks with a dual board system in Asia's newly-industrialized economies (NIEs). This research examines the effects of board structure and ownership on a bank's performance using a sample of 41 commercial banks in an Asian NIE (Taiwan). Results showed that board size, numbers of outside directors, and family-owned shares are positively associated with bank performance, whereas the number of supervisory directors has a negative influence on performance. The findings provide empirical support for corporate governance, which improves the performance of banks with a dual board system in Taiwan.

Corporate governance, accruals quality and stock returns: evidence from the UK

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sulaiman Mouselli ◽  
Riad Abdulraouf ◽  
Aziz Jaafar
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Stock Returns ◽  
Information Quality ◽  
Financial Information ◽  
Governance Mechanism ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Accruals Quality ◽  
Market Factor

Purpose – This paper aims to identify the most significant governance provision in enhancing the financial information quality of UK listed firms. In addition, it investigates the influence of this governance provision in explaining stock returns of 20 UK industry portfolios. Design/methodology/approach – To identify the main governance provision in enhancing the accruals quality, the paper runs regressions of accruals quality variable on the total governance variable, on the governance provisions individually, and on the governance provisions taken together with and without integrating control variables. Next, Asset Pricing tests are employed to examine the capacity of the audit provision, as proved the most influential governance provision on accruals quality, to explain stock returns. The quantitative approach used in the paper enables to investigate the relationship between corporate governance, accruals quality, and stock returns. Findings – Results indicate that audit provision is the most important governance mechanism affecting accruals quality. In addition, this mechanism is comparable with the book-to-market factor in explaining the time-series variation in portfolios returns. Furthermore, the introduction of the Audit factor to Fama-French model reduces the significance of the size factor and the book-to-market factor in explaining stock returns. This suggests that size and the book-to-market factors contain information related to the audit provision. Research limitations/implications – The findings of the paper carry implications for investors as they do not need to equally weight all corporate governance provisions in their resource allocation decisions. The significant influence of audit provision on accruals quality needs to be taken into consideration when investment decisions are made. Audit factor is important in predicting future returns. It is also found to be as good as book-to-market factor in explaining portfolios returns. Also, the findings have many implications for regulatory bodies in their efforts to enhance financial information quality. Establishing roles for best governance in reducing information risk should focus, among other things, on the significant elements of corporate governance in improving accruals quality. The main limitation of the study is the restricted variation in the Audit governance factor which comes from the source of corporate governance data, i.e. CGQ. Firms in the sample do not exhibit diversified levels of Audit scores. Accordingly, when constructing audit risk factor it was found that firms could only be split into two portfolios according to their Audit scores instead of five. Originality/value – This study identifies audit provision as the most significant governance mechanism in enhancing the financial information quality of UK listed firms. In addition, a factor representing audit provision is constructed to investigate the influence of this provision on stock returns. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study that examines the capacity of the audit provision to explain stock returns in an asset pricing framework.

scholarly journals Does board structure drive dividends payout? Evidence from the Sultanate of Oman

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 218-230
Author(s):  
Badar Alshabibi ◽  
Shanmuga Pria ◽  
Khaled Hussainey
Keyword(s):  
Institutional Environment ◽  
Gender Diversity ◽  
Board Structure ◽  
Corporate Board ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Board Characteristics ◽  
Oil Crisis ◽  
And Gender ◽  
The Impact ◽  
New Evidence

The study investigates whether corporate board characteristics influence dividends policy in Omani listed firms. It also examines whether this relationship is determined by the recent global oil crisis. Using a sample of 109 listed firms in Muscat Securities Exchange between 2009 and 2019, we find that dividends payout is positively associated with board independence, board activity, and board nationality diversity. Though, no evidence is found that board size and gender diversity have an impact on dividends payout. Interestingly, when controlling for the global oil crisis, none of the corporate board attributes influence dividends payout. This study presents new evidence on the influence of board structure on dividends policy. The findings suggest that the impact of corporate board characteristics on dividends policy is contingent on the surrounding institutional environment (i.e., the recent global oil crisis).

Relationship between Corporate Governance Index and Firm Performance: Indian Evidence

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 675-689 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akshita Arora ◽  
Shernaz Bodhanwala
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Firm Performance ◽  
Performance Metrics ◽  
Market Competition ◽  
Board Structure ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Market For Corporate Control ◽  
Governance Index ◽  
The Relationship

The Indian corporate governance norms have been evolving over a period of time but limited number of studies have been undertaken with reference to corporate governance index (CGI) in the Indian context. The study aims to examine the relationship between CGI and firm performance. We construct CGI using important parameters of governance such as board structure, ownership structure, market for corporate control and market competition. Our panel data set comprises of listed firms and the estimation analysis has been carried out using random effects method. The study reveals significant positive relationship between CGI and firm performance metrics. CGI is an important and causal factor in explaining firm performance. The investors would also have positive perception about business firms maintaining high governance standards, thus reducing possible funding costs.

scholarly journals Impact of corporate governance on financial disclosures: Evidence from India

2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 874-889 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehul Raithatha ◽  
Varadraj Bapat
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Board Independence ◽  
Board Structure ◽  
Board Size ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Disclosure Requirements ◽  
Financial Disclosures

The paper aims at identifying impact of corporate governance variables i.e. board structure (board size, board independence, board activity and board busyness) and ownership structure (foreign promoters holding, institutional shareholding and CEO duality) on financial disclosures made by the Indian firms. Using cross sectional data of 325 listed firms for the financial year 2009-10, we compute financial disclosure score (using 171 checklist points) based on disclosure requirements of accounting standards. We find average disclosure score of 73%, maximum and minimum being 100% and 46% respectively. Our finding support agency theory in terms of monitoring role of board since board size is found to be significant however we do not find any influence of board independence on the disclosures. The study also supports resource dependency theory in terms of outside directorship which might provide exposure to different corporate environment, brings diverse perspectives and knowledge to the directors and this in turn leads to improved disclosures. We also support the notion that having foreign promoter shareholding improves disclosures

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document