scholarly journals PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE PARTICIPATION FOR UNIVERSAL COVERAGE IN THE NATIONAL HEALTH INSURANCE ERA IN DENPASAR, BALI

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luh Putu Sinthya Ulandari ◽  
◽  
Putu Ayu Indrayathi ◽  
Ida Ayu Gede Prabawanti ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Insurance ◽  
National Health Insurance ◽  
National Health ◽  
Private Health Insurance ◽  
Universal Coverage

How Single-payer Stacks Up: Evaluating Different Models of Universal Health Coverage on Cost, Access, and Quality

2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 568-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley Fox ◽  
Roland Poirier
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Health Insurance ◽  
National Health Insurance ◽  
National Health ◽  
Universal Coverage ◽  
The United States ◽  
Health Coverage ◽  
Single Payer ◽  
Access And Quality ◽  
Universal Health

Described as “universal prepayment,” the national health insurance (or single-payer) model of universal health coverage is increasingly promoted by international actors as a means of raising revenue for health care and improving social risk protection in low- and middle-income countries. Likewise, in the United States, the recent failed efforts to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act have renewed debate about where to go next with health reform and arguably opened the door for a single-payer, Medicare-for-All plan, an alternative once considered politically infeasible. Policy debates about single-payer or national health insurance in the United States and abroad have relied heavily on Canada’s system as an ideal-typical single-payer system but have not systematically examined health system performance indicators across different universal coverage models. Using available cross-national data, we categorize countries with universal coverage into those best exemplifying national health insurance (single-payer), national health service, and social health insurance models and compare them to the United States in terms of cost, access, and quality. Through this comparison, we find that many critiques of single-payer are based on misconceptions or are factually incorrect, but also that single-payer is not the only option for achieving universal coverage in the United States and internationally.

scholarly journals Private Health Insurance and Hospitalization Under Japanese National Health Insurance

2009 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-70
Author(s):  
Tetsuji Yamada ◽  
Chia-Ching Chen ◽  
Tadashi Yamada ◽  
Haruko Noguchi ◽  
Matthew Miller
Keyword(s):  
Health Insurance ◽  
National Health Insurance ◽  
National Health ◽  
Private Health Insurance

scholarly journals Factors Of National Health Insurance, Factors Of Health Service And Factors Of Social Security Administrator Influence On The Satisfaction Of Independent BPJS Class One At Kertha Usada General Hospital

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 508-515
Author(s):  
Aditha Angga Pratama
Keyword(s):  
Health Insurance ◽  
Health Service ◽  
National Health Insurance ◽  
National Health ◽  
Universal Coverage ◽  
Simple Random Sampling ◽  
Dominant Factor ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Cross Sectional

Since 2004 Indonesia has campaigned for universal coverage as one of the improvements in health status. But until now there are still many Health insurance organizer (BPJS) participants who feel unsatisfied with the services they get, especially when Health insurance organizer participants are self-employed in class I inpatient services. The goal of this study is to identify the most dominant factor that can affect the satisfaction of Health insurance organizer participants' services in Kertha Usadha. The cross sectional survey research was conducted on 104 class 1 independent Health insurance organizer participants by simple random sampling. The selected Health insurance organizer participants were interviewed while in a state of hospitalization that was adjusted to the inclusion criteria of this study. The instrument used a structured questionnaire, with several related variables: characteristics, National Health Insurance factors, Health insurance organizer and health services. Variables were analyzed using Chi Square and then Logistic Regression with software. The results of this study found that 54.8% of B Health insurance organizer participants were satisfied with the services provided. While the results of multivariate analysis found that the factors influencing the satisfaction of Health insurance organizer participants were the National Health Insurance Factors that were good to moderate services (AOR: 1.2, 95% CI 0.8-1.43), good to less services (AOR: 3.4, 95% CI 1.5-7.53) and health service factors (AOR: 9.6, 95% CI 2.37-39.3). Health insurance organizer participant satisfaction is still low so it needs improvement in everything. So that later with increased satisfaction can improve the degree of public health

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document