The use of science in long span bridge engineering

2013 ◽  
Vol 101 (23) ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Robin Sham
2012 ◽  
Vol 178-181 ◽  
pp. 2501-2504
Author(s):  
Chun Lin He ◽  
Cheng Zhong Gong

With the development of long-span bridge engineering and increase of load on construction, the piles which socketed in rock more than 5 diameters have been used in some bridge engineering. Based on the technique of Anchored piles method, the static load tests of large diameter and deep socketed piles had been carried out in Qingdao Gulf Bridge. The bearing characteristics of large diameter pile were analyzed, including the load displacement curves of test pile; the axial force; the relationship between side friction and displacement and the sharing ratio of side resistance and end resistance. Finally, the test results were compared with specifications, The results showed that the bearing characteristic of deep socketed piles was as same as the friction piles in this area; from the results of test the side friction of pile could be estimated lower in strongly weathering breccia area while the friction in strong- weakly weathered breccia was relatively close to the value of exploration reports. At the bottom of the pile, because the relatively displacement of pile-rock was small, the pile side resistance is relatively small. It could be seen that the estimate of bearing capacity was less than the test result, and the pile foundation was safety enough.


PCI Journal ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 86-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Laszlo ◽  
Richard R. Imper

2021 ◽  
Vol 787 (1) ◽  
pp. 012192
Author(s):  
Changqing Wu ◽  
Qiming Yu ◽  
Botao Zhu ◽  
Huangyi Ling ◽  
Jiaqi Zheng ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Giorgio Diana ◽  
Stoyan Stoyanoff ◽  
Andrew Allsop ◽  
Luca Amerio ◽  
Tommaso Argentini ◽  
...  

<p>This paper is part of a series of publications aimed at the divulgation of the results of the 3-step benchmark proposed by the IABSE Task Group 3.1 to define reference results for the validation of the software that simulate the aeroelastic stability and the response to the turbulent wind of super-long span bridges. Step 1 is a numerical comparison of different numerical models both a sectional model (Step 1.1) and a full bridge (Step 1.2) are studied. Step 2 will be the comparison of predicted results and experimental tests in wind tunnel. Step 3 will be a comparison against full scale measurements.</p><p>The results of Step 1.1 related to the response of a sectional model were presented to the last IABSE Symposium in Nantes 2018. In this paper, the results of Step 1.2 related to the response long-span full bridge are presented in this paper both in terms of aeroelastic stability and buffeting response, comparing the results coming from several TG members.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document